The OFFICIAL "I have a wheel offset / tire fitment question!" thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-25-2016 | 01:01 AM
  #1531  
blnewt's Avatar
blnewt
Movin On!
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,877
Likes: 4,944
Originally Posted by DennisG37
Haha thanks blnewt, just trying to learn something. It's always harder to figure out a setup when you can't physically test it yourself on the car. I was hoping to get the 245/285 setup because if the rolling variance is so miniscule. Plus, if I'm buying new wheels, might as well take this opportunity to upgrade my tires sizes, too.
Yeah, getting the proper offsets so you can run that much tire would be a good plan, and the 245/285 stagger looks
Old 06-25-2016 | 02:10 AM
  #1532  
DennisG37's Avatar
DennisG37
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 118
Likes: 3
From: Massachusetts
Haha yeah, I love the look of meaty tires. I'm only asking about these offsets cause they are being offered at a really good deal.

Originally Posted by blnewt
Yeah, getting the proper offsets
so you can run that much tire would be a good plan, and the 245/285 stagger looks
Old 06-25-2016 | 04:17 PM
  #1533  
evil-G-nius's Avatar
evil-G-nius
Registered Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,266
Likes: 396
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Hey, when measuring the variance...how do you properly calculate the numbers between front and back seeing as they are different sizes? Do you take whatever number for both and divide by 2 to get the average? Just curious of the best way to do it...the most accurate
Old 06-25-2016 | 05:28 PM
  #1534  
blnewt's Avatar
blnewt
Movin On!
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,877
Likes: 4,944
Originally Posted by evil-G-nius
Hey, when measuring the variance...how do you properly calculate the numbers between front and back seeing as they are different sizes? Do you take whatever number for both and divide by 2 to get the average? Just curious of the best way to do it...the most accurate
I'll get back to you tonight, stay tuned
Old 06-26-2016 | 01:00 AM
  #1535  
blnewt's Avatar
blnewt
Movin On!
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,877
Likes: 4,944
Originally Posted by evil-G-nius
Hey, when measuring the variance...how do you properly calculate the numbers between front and back seeing as they are different sizes? Do you take whatever number for both and divide by 2 to get the average? Just curious of the best way to do it...the most accurate
Use this calculator
https://www.myg37.com/forums/tire_rim_calculator.php
Plug in the front tire on top and the rear tire on the bottom. If you have a negative % the tire on the bottom is smaller, if the % is positive the top tire is smaller diameter.

Ideally you want a slightly larger diameter in back since the rears wear faster, this will bring the variance closer to zero over time. If you start w/ a smaller diameter in back the variance will get worse over time.

And once you get tires w/ a good variance you can go to the tire brands' website and look up the exact diameter for that tire model & size, then just divide one diameter by the other to get the true variance of that brand tire at those sizes.

FWIW here's a list of some of the more common sizes in combos that will work w/ AWD staggered setups~
18s
235/45 & 265/40 (0.07%)
245/45 & 275/40 -0.07%
255/45 & 285/40 -0.22%

19s
235/40 & 265/35 -0.37%
235/40 & 275/35 0.67%
245/40 & 275/35 -0.52%
245/40 & 28535 0.51%

20s
235/35 & 275/30 0.07%
245/35 & 285/30 -0.07%
The following users liked this post:
the93owner (06-26-2016)
Old 06-26-2016 | 03:43 PM
  #1536  
evil-G-nius's Avatar
evil-G-nius
Registered Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,266
Likes: 396
From: Santa Rosa, CA
This method wont work for a square setups. Well i'll have to right down the differences and then do the math.

So for mine the fronts end up .06" (.22%) and the rear is .31" (1.17%)
So if I divide the rear by the front it ends up being 5.32%. Is that right? That seems awfully high and problematic apparently.
Old 06-26-2016 | 08:21 PM
  #1537  
blnewt's Avatar
blnewt
Movin On!
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,877
Likes: 4,944
Originally Posted by evil-G-nius
This method wont work for a square setups. Well i'll have to right down the differences and then do the math.

So for mine the fronts end up .06" (.22%) and the rear is .31" (1.17%)
So if I divide the rear by the front it ends up being 5.32%. Is that right? That seems awfully high and problematic apparently.
Not really sure what you're wanting. If it's a square setup you just use your OEM tire size on the top line and your new tire size on the bottom. With AWD you want front to back to be under 1%, if you just want to run a different square setup then you can be up to 3% difference.
What tire size are you wanting to run?
Old 06-26-2016 | 08:28 PM
  #1538  
the93owner's Avatar
the93owner
Registered Member
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 335
From: Maryland
I'm also confused. If you run a square setup, that means front & rear tire size will be the same so there's zero difference.
Old 06-26-2016 | 09:33 PM
  #1539  
evil-G-nius's Avatar
evil-G-nius
Registered Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,266
Likes: 396
From: Santa Rosa, CA
^^^Exactly. I will be running 255/40 19 square. If I do the math according to the calculator, both wheels, compared to stock size, are close as you see from my previous post. But when you do the average as you said the overall % difference is like 5%. That seems high.
Old 06-26-2016 | 09:53 PM
  #1540  
blnewt's Avatar
blnewt
Movin On!
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,877
Likes: 4,944
Originally Posted by evil-G-nius
^^^Exactly. I will be running 255/40 19 square. If I do the math according to the calculator, both wheels, compared to stock size, are close as you see from my previous post. But when you do the average as you said the overall % difference is like 5%. That seems high.
On a RWD S coupe the speed sensor is set up for a 245/40/19 tire, so going to a 255/40 will result in a 1.17% larger diameter which is just fine for a square setup. If your coupe is a base w/ 225/50/18s they would be only 0.64% larger.
The following users liked this post:
evil-G-nius (06-27-2016)
Old 06-27-2016 | 12:04 AM
  #1541  
evil-G-nius's Avatar
evil-G-nius
Registered Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,266
Likes: 396
From: Santa Rosa, CA
ok goo. So the rear is all I really needed to worry about! Thats all I needed to know
Old 06-27-2016 | 02:05 AM
  #1542  
etphonehome22's Avatar
etphonehome22
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 27
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by blnewt
I assume w/ your bagged setup that you want to run a pretty aggressive set.
I'd post over in the hellaflush thread just to get some guidelines.
https://www.myg37.com/forums/wheels-...sh-thread.html


For a lowered G (on coilovers) to zero gap running 8.5 front you could go w/ a +20 offset on 245/40 and 10.5 +35 on 295/35 in back.
Thanks I'll see what input they'll have for me
Old 07-10-2016 | 07:04 PM
  #1543  
machomike8's Avatar
machomike8
Registered Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 52
Likes: 13
From: Edgewood, KY
Help!

Help! I have a 2013 G37x Sedan. After reading up on wheels for quite awhile and after talking with Discount Tire I purchased a set of Konig Oversteers in 19x8.5 +30 square with 255/40/19. I liked the meatier/wide tire for a little extra curb protection. Unfortunately at stock height I have almost 10mm of poke outside the fenders. My question is #1, can this size/setup work on sedans (under compression will this hit my fenders) and #2 could it be fixed if I dropped it about an inch or run some negative camber? How much would a mild drop effect the poke i have? What are my other options for making these wheels work ie. springs, camber adjustment, etc? Thanks in advance. blnewt take the wheel!
Attached Thumbnails The OFFICIAL "I have a wheel offset / tire fitment question!" thread-capture1.jpg   The OFFICIAL "I have a wheel offset / tire fitment question!" thread-capture2.jpg  

Last edited by machomike8; 07-10-2016 at 07:15 PM.
Old 07-10-2016 | 08:25 PM
  #1544  
blnewt's Avatar
blnewt
Movin On!
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,877
Likes: 4,944
That's easy Mike, those will tuck just fine under compression. The look right now is a bit poked but nothing crazy. A milder Eibach or Swift drop will have you looking proper, and even as it sits (with the exception of the tire/fender gap) it's not bad at all.
IIRC the tires will tuck about 1/3" for every 1" drop, so a 1.25" drop will get you just about the 10mm you're extending from the fenders.
Old 07-11-2016 | 07:41 AM
  #1545  
Project-vipg's Avatar
Project-vipg
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 85
Likes: 12
From: PNW
Been researching seen 20x10.5 et 38 or so is pretty common but I am bagged so when I air out I gain a lot of camber wondering if anyone has done 20x10.5 +10 square on a sedan looking for lip to fender fitment



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:27 AM.