High End G37 Twin Turbo...
07-24-2008, 08:47 PM
#32
Registered User
I have a lot of thoughts and comments about the exterior and interior of that vehicle, but if it's as fast as I assume it to be with that engine build, all I'll say is, "cool, show me some time slips".
That said, I think the smooth update rate of an analog tach is one million times better than something digital anyday, fast car or not.
Okay, I can't hold my tongue...I wouldn't be caught dead driving that. The exterior is forgivable all things considered, but the interior is an abomination and whomever designed it should be kicked out of the gene pool.
Yup...definitely couldn't hold my tongue. I still appreciate the speed of the build though - anyone know how fast it really is?
That said, I think the smooth update rate of an analog tach is one million times better than something digital anyday, fast car or not.
Okay, I can't hold my tongue...I wouldn't be caught dead driving that. The exterior is forgivable all things considered, but the interior is an abomination and whomever designed it should be kicked out of the gene pool.
Yup...definitely couldn't hold my tongue. I still appreciate the speed of the build though - anyone know how fast it really is?
07-24-2008, 08:49 PM
#33
I have a lot of thoughts and comments about the exterior and interior of that vehicle, but if it's as fast as I assume it to be with that engine build, all I'll say is, "cool, show me some time slips".
That said, I think the smooth update rate of an analog tach is one million times better than something digital anyday, fast car or not.
Okay, I can't hold my tongue...I wouldn't be caught dead driving that. The exterior is forgivable all things considered, but the interior is an abomination and whomever designed it should be kicked out of the gene pool.
Yup...definitely couldn't hold my tongue.
That said, I think the smooth update rate of an analog tach is one million times better than something digital anyday, fast car or not.
Okay, I can't hold my tongue...I wouldn't be caught dead driving that. The exterior is forgivable all things considered, but the interior is an abomination and whomever designed it should be kicked out of the gene pool.
Yup...definitely couldn't hold my tongue.
I do hate that though, spending all that money on performance and power, and not even using it lol.
07-24-2008, 10:05 PM
#34
that car looks and sounds like it should be in the scrap yard. sorry if I offend anyone, but why would anyone want to ruin a really nice car like that??? it certainly can't qualify as a sleeper, or low profile, and I would doubt it is fast enough to warrant all that junk hanging on it. High end???***** please!
07-25-2008, 12:59 AM
#37
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Camarillo
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
that car looks and sounds like it should be in the scrap yard. sorry if I offend anyone, but why would anyone want to ruin a really nice car like that??? it certainly can't qualify as a sleeper, or low profile, and I would doubt it is fast enough to warrant all that junk hanging on it. High end???***** please!
Last edited by PhukenA; 07-25-2008 at 01:07 AM.
07-25-2008, 01:43 AM
#39
Are you guys to ignorant to figure out this is a Show car? Its made to be eye catching... make magazines... and gain attention. The TT build is insanely BEAUTIFUL... Its the Best yet... The outside is not suppose to be made to eveyones tastes... its suppose to be off the wall and over the top... This car will keep winning awards for a while...
Please releaze before you start ******* the car... realize what it is....
Please releaze before you start ******* the car... realize what it is....
07-25-2008, 02:42 AM
#40
Sorry to say but the word "show" doesn't excuse what they did with this car. I just can't get the word "why' outta my head. Why would they do this? Show or no show, they hacked and tore up a beautiful machine, and all they do is take it around and let people look at it!! This is insane. I would defend this car if it wasn't a show car, if some kid put the money and effort into making this thing, and it was his style and he loved it, that would be great. But some company just took a g!ant **** on themselve with some of the choices they made for this ride, and the fact that they can't even enjoy it, that it was all done for "show" makes me ill. There's no point to that IMO.
07-25-2008, 03:06 AM
#41
No point? They got exposure for themselves by landing the cover of Super Street and winning awards at two major shows they were in. What other G37s have gotten this kind of coverage in a nationally published mag? Like Max said, it was built to be one of a kind, outrageous, and get people's attention. Obviously, it's doing just that.
http://gangsta-original.com/blog/?p=546
http://gangsta-original.com/blog/?p=546
Last edited by Buddy Revell; 07-25-2008 at 03:16 AM.
07-25-2008, 03:13 AM
#42
WOW REALLY??? I could put my company on the map by painting a G37 with human **** but I wouldn't cause it's gross- A and B theres no point. Just because something gets attention doesn't make it cool or smart. They have no parts out, no kits, no nothing, and they can't even drive the thing. Is it even street legal? It's all smoke and mirrors man. I can take a G and fabricate it to fit 28's and paint it sparkly pink orange and purple and it will probably get on the cover of DUB or something, but that doesn't make it cool. It would be butt ugly and serve no purpose, just like this car.
07-25-2008, 03:21 AM
#43
WOW REALLY??? I could put my company on the map by painting a G37 with human **** but I wouldn't cause it's gross- A and B theres no point. Just because something gets attention doesn't make it cool or smart. They have no parts out, no kits, no nothing, and they can't even drive the thing. Is it even street legal? It's all smoke and mirrors man. I can take a G and fabricate it to fit 28's and paint it sparkly pink orange and purple and it will probably get on the cover of DUB or something, but that doesn't make it cool. It would be butt ugly and serve no purpose, just like this car.
