Sample pics with my new Rebel XSi (450D)
#46
#47
I've found yet another reason why you should upgrade your web browser to Opera...
Right clicking on any image will give you all the EXIF data for that image. Right clicking on Snareman's G35 picture gives you the following info. You can see aperture, shutter speed, ISO, etc.. oh, and camera brand.![Big Grin](https://www.myg37.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![](http://i284.photobucket.com/albums/ll1/finagle69/Capture.jpg)
Right clicking on any image will give you all the EXIF data for that image. Right clicking on Snareman's G35 picture gives you the following info. You can see aperture, shutter speed, ISO, etc.. oh, and camera brand.
![Big Grin](https://www.myg37.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![](http://i284.photobucket.com/albums/ll1/finagle69/Capture.jpg)
Nice Camera and nice photos. I have Xti (400D) and I satisfied with it. I think about upgrading to 40D or a 1d Mk2 or 5D. depending on my bucket.
try to upgrade your lens kit and you will love your camera more. the true performance of it will come with the better quality lenses.
#48
I like this feature in opera. I think I will upgrade now to it. Maybe it will be better than Firefox.
Nice Camera and nice photos. I have Xti (400D) and I satisfied with it. I think about upgrading to 40D or a 1d Mk2 or 5D. depending on my bucket.
try to upgrade your lens kit and you will love your camera more. the true performance of it will come with the better quality lenses.
Nice Camera and nice photos. I have Xti (400D) and I satisfied with it. I think about upgrading to 40D or a 1d Mk2 or 5D. depending on my bucket.
try to upgrade your lens kit and you will love your camera more. the true performance of it will come with the better quality lenses.
#49
^
^
Yeah
I have 24-70 sigma as walkaround lens and 70-200 sigma. they were a great combination, I just aim for 12-24 tokina or 10-17 tokina for now. The quality of photos were better than my previous lens. Which made me still on my 400D for more than a year.
Also your photos are great and your ride is nice.
^
Yeah
I have 24-70 sigma as walkaround lens and 70-200 sigma. they were a great combination, I just aim for 12-24 tokina or 10-17 tokina for now. The quality of photos were better than my previous lens. Which made me still on my 400D for more than a year.
Also your photos are great and your ride is nice.
#50
I have the Canon 10-22 and its a fun lens that you can get some great perspectives with. It creates a bit of a fisheye effect, although not nearly as much as the 14mm fisheye. Or is it 12mm fisheye. There is the one lens that has such a wide angle that when you're pointing straight in front of you, you have to be careful your feet aren't in the pic!
![Icon09](https://www.myg37.com/forums/images/smilies/icon09.gif)
#53
Post Whore
The 40D is outdated compared to the XSi in terms of technology, even though it is considered more of a "pro" body camera. If you're deciding between those two, I'd get the XSi body only then put that $200-300 you saved into getting a decent lens.
#54
I have the Canon 10-22 and its a fun lens that you can get some great perspectives with. It creates a bit of a fisheye effect, although not nearly as much as the 14mm fisheye. Or is it 12mm fisheye. There is the one lens that has such a wide angle that when you're pointing straight in front of you, you have to be careful your feet aren't in the pic! ![Icon09](https://www.myg37.com/forums/images/smilies/icon09.gif)
![Icon09](https://www.myg37.com/forums/images/smilies/icon09.gif)
XSi easy to use and have a great technology. 40D more pro and a fast burst shooting. If you will go to shoot for sports u will need 40D, unless XSi will be more than enough.
I prefer to see your bucket and go for body camera and take a good lens with it as psyh said. or take the kit it will not be that bad, especially with the 18-55 IS lens, It have better performance than the old version of it.
#58
I have the 50 1.4, but I agree - the 1.8 is a great lens for the price! None of the 50's (the 1.2L, 1.4 or 1.8) are very sharp wide open, but around 2.2 on the 1.8 or mayn 1.8-2 on the 1.4 it starts getting decently sharp. You just have to be careful if you're up close because the depth of field is so shallow you're likely to get someone's nose in focus and not the rest of their face. Aim for their eyes.
#60
I'd love to get the 400 or 500, except they start getting pretty expensive in that range.
![Doh](https://www.myg37.com/forums/images/smilies/doh.gif)