MREV v2 on RevUp motor dyno
05-11-2006, 12:38 PM
#16
Originally Posted by ratm68
I think MREV is merely the 03-04 lower plenum with spacer. MREV+ has the machining done to the front two port. MREV++ has additional machining. I might be wrong, but that's my impression. It might be cheaper for you since you can exchange your current 03-04 plenum for the machined plenum.
~Khoa
~Khoa
mrev+ simply switches out the lower plenum with one from the 03/04 engines. No special machining (afaik)
05-11-2006, 12:43 PM
#17
Originally Posted by Virge
mrev+ simply switches out the lower plenum with one from the 03/04 engines. No special machining (afaik)
~Khoa
05-11-2006, 01:23 PM
#18
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
this is the MACHINED MREV: it got mined down a little bit for both anterior inlets
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b1...k/DSC00666.jpg
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b1...k/DSC00665.jpg
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b1...k/DSC00623.jpg
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b1...k/DSC00666.jpg
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b1...k/DSC00665.jpg
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b1...k/DSC00623.jpg
05-11-2006, 01:32 PM
#20
Premier Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NoVA
Posts: 5,923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Apparently from what devon has shown is that if you add the rest of the mods that let it breathe, you are in good shape. I like the way his curve looks. its not that different than stock on the top end (shape wise)
So, lesson learned is that if you want to make up for the loss up top, you need to work the back end of the car i.e exhaust, high flow cats.
So, lesson learned is that if you want to make up for the loss up top, you need to work the back end of the car i.e exhaust, high flow cats.
05-11-2006, 01:34 PM
#21
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by clokwork
you are in good shape. I like the way his curve looks.
So, lesson learned is that if you want to make up for the loss up top, you need to work the back end
So, lesson learned is that if you want to make up for the loss up top, you need to work the back end
05-11-2006, 01:38 PM
#22
Premier Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NoVA
Posts: 5,923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
actually, looking at the two dynos side by side, there is a huge difference in power at rpm intervals it could be due to the dyno machine type (pack vs jet), but for instance, at 4k rpms, the original dyno at the top of the thread showed right under 200 hp. Devons dyno shows about 180. thats nearly a 16-18 hp diff at my best guess.
Pick any point along the curves and do a comparison. its waay different.
Pick any point along the curves and do a comparison. its waay different.
05-11-2006, 02:04 PM
#23
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: TX
Posts: 1,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That is deffinatley the 2 types of dynos being used. The RPM band is not the best because they don't tap the wire they use a round loop and loop it over the tach wire for a signal.....if you remeber that Colbalt on the dyno had a really hard time getting the tach signal. It is to be used as a general reference.
05-12-2006, 03:23 PM
#27
Journeyman
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by G-Tofu
The MREV2 dyno plot recently made with the 5/16" is vastly better.
05-12-2006, 05:11 PM
#30
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by terryw
tony you got link to the vastly better dyno you speak of? id like to check it out
It is on either here ir my350z.com. It looks great.
BTW, my mrev2 arrived this afternoon!!!!