MN G CREW This is the subforum for the MN G CREW

Official *MN G CREW* rAnDoM chat thread/room

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-18-2012 | 11:07 AM
  #8551  
WannabeSport's Avatar
WannabeSport
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 43
From: Minnesota
Well you aren't driving yours half the time hahaha.

Go drive 20k a year. Thirsty cars begin to add up LOL. If i didn't care about MPGs i'd be driving a QX56. But it wouldn't take long for $100 fillups to put me in the red. Especially once a week.

I would like to shoot for low 20s in town, and low 30s on the highway in my next car. I do not need all about horsepower lol. Much rather have a blend of performance, fun and efficiency.

Last edited by WannabeSport; 10-18-2012 at 11:19 AM.
Old 10-18-2012 | 11:29 AM
  #8552  
ezpotato's Avatar
ezpotato
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 620
Likes: 1
i like janik's train of thought.... once you start driving that much and it hurts your wallet, mpg matter a little. luckily, anything over 24hwy to me is good enough... although a car that doesnt take premium and gets 34+ is amazing (kasey's car)... just boring.
Old 10-18-2012 | 11:38 AM
  #8553  
soolman32's Avatar
soolman32
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,127
Likes: 127
From: MN
I use to not care about gas mileage at all, but these days it does play a factor. I honestly wouldn't want more power than the G currently has if it meant downright crappy gas mileage. Now if I had a fairly fuel efficient DD 20/30 then I wouldn't mind having a fun car with big power and not so year gas mileage. I'm happy with the balance of power/efficiency the G offers, could be better, but good enough.
Old 10-18-2012 | 12:07 PM
  #8554  
DGGal's Avatar
DGGal
Minnesota G owners
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 9
well luckily we won't have to worry too much about it in the near future..i'm sure by then all of us will have new cars, and they all have to meet the government regulations..so just have to wait it out until then and hope the gas prices don't get TOO ridiculous...
Old 10-18-2012 | 12:10 PM
  #8555  
WannabeSport's Avatar
WannabeSport
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 43
From: Minnesota
Well, i'v been managing to eek out 22mpg in town with mixed driving. I keep it under 3k, neutral down hills etc lol. I near-hyper mile the G haha.
Old 10-18-2012 | 12:14 PM
  #8556  
MN-G-Fever's Avatar
MN-G-Fever
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,304
Likes: 2
From: Plymouth, MN
Originally Posted by WannabeSport
Well you aren't driving yours half the time hahaha.

Go drive 20k a year. Thirsty cars begin to add up LOL. If i didn't care about MPGs i'd be driving a QX56. But it wouldn't take long for $100 fillups to put me in the red. Especially once a week.

I would like to shoot for low 20s in town, and low 30s on the highway in my next car. I do not need all about horsepower lol. Much rather have a blend of performance, fun and efficiency.
Yea you guys drive alot more than me, I would never get a QX or something that massive since there isn't the need for it. But for you it makes sense to keep MPG into consideration


Originally Posted by ezpotato
i like janik's train of thought.... once you start driving that much and it hurts your wallet, mpg matter a little. luckily, anything over 24hwy to me is good enough... although a car that doesnt take premium and gets 34+ is amazing (kasey's car)... just boring.
You got that right I don't drive much anymore and only had a 25 mile commute each day back when I was working in MPLS. My M35 gets about the same MPG as my G which is around 23 mpg.

Originally Posted by soolman32
I use to not care about gas mileage at all, but these days it does play a factor. I honestly wouldn't want more power than the G currently has if it meant downright crappy gas mileage. Now if I had a fairly fuel efficient DD 20/30 then I wouldn't mind having a fun car with big power and not so year gas mileage. I'm happy with the balance of power/efficiency the G offers, could be better, but good enough.
Makes more sense to care about your DD's MPG than your weekend car. I already told you I am going V8 next for my weekend/fun car so i will be getting some turrible turrible MPG and will be loving every second of the growl my car has
Old 10-18-2012 | 01:24 PM
  #8557  
Songle6MT's Avatar
Songle6MT
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 871
Likes: 3
From: Fargo, ND
Originally Posted by MN-G-Fever
I could give two $hits about MPG, last thing im concerned about when getting a car
Haha agree to a point lol...

If I get mid 20's on the freeway I'm a pretty happy camper. I wouldn't sacrifice the power for better mpg's... There would be no way you would catch me DD'ing a car with 170hp that gets low 30's, absolutely not.

Originally Posted by ezpotato
i like janik's train of thought.... once you start driving that much and it hurts your wallet, mpg matter a little. luckily, anything over 24hwy to me is good enough... although a car that doesnt take premium and gets 34+ is amazing (kasey's car)... just boring.
Meh, I drive just as much as Janik. It concerns me slightly but no where near his concern.

I agree with your highway mileage statement though. Anything in the mid 20's is good especially if the car is fun to drive!

Originally Posted by DGGal
well luckily we won't have to worry too much about it in the near future..i'm sure by then all of us will have new cars, and they all have to meet the government regulations..so just have to wait it out until then and hope the gas prices don't get TOO ridiculous...
This is true, and as technology advances the cars will stay just as powerful as they are now.
Old 10-18-2012 | 01:37 PM
  #8558  
WannabeSport's Avatar
WannabeSport
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 43
From: Minnesota
I don't have the same power craze as you all so it is easier for me to drive a less powerful car lol. Yea, i wont drive a 170hp car (but low 30s? New Altimas and Accords are getting 40s with 190hp lol) but a 250-270hp car that does low 30s ill be golden. 328i is a perfect example. I love that car lol.
Old 10-18-2012 | 01:40 PM
  #8559  
ezpotato's Avatar
ezpotato
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 620
Likes: 1
my ***** hurt.
Old 10-18-2012 | 01:54 PM
  #8560  
WannabeSport's Avatar
WannabeSport
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 43
From: Minnesota
Whys that? Kasey kick you in them? LOL
Old 10-18-2012 | 02:04 PM
  #8561  
MN-G-Fever's Avatar
MN-G-Fever
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,304
Likes: 2
From: Plymouth, MN
i think he has his cat lick them and the cat got a little frisky
Old 10-18-2012 | 02:13 PM
  #8562  
ezpotato's Avatar
ezpotato
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 620
Likes: 1
i, again, like how this man thinks... ^
Old 10-18-2012 | 02:57 PM
  #8563  
Songle6MT's Avatar
Songle6MT
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 871
Likes: 3
From: Fargo, ND
Originally Posted by WannabeSport
I don't have the same power craze as you all so it is easier for me to drive a less powerful car lol. Yea, i wont drive a 170hp car (but low 30s? New Altimas and Accords are getting 40s with 190hp lol) but a 250-270hp car that does low 30s ill be golden. 328i is a perfect example. I love that car lol.
And I reiterate, technology is moving quickly. I'm still in the era where those 140-180hp cars are getting low 30's. Except, of course, for the few exceptions that are around.

I'm also talking about mpg's at like 75-80, not what the epa estimates them at what like 70 tops....

And I would probably rock a 328, but I would have to drive one first. Power similar to the G with low 30mpg's stock would be nice. And of course, with a stock turbo, much easier to make a lot quicker lol

Originally Posted by MN-G-Fever
i think he has his cat lick them and the cat got a little frisky
Originally Posted by ezpotato
i, again, like how this man thinks... ^
You guys are somethin' else
Old 10-18-2012 | 03:23 PM
  #8564  
Hotsauce's Avatar
Hotsauce
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Oh this blows. I was forced to go into my mom insurance since I am not in any ones policy.

$150 with two cars with just my mom on the policy (Monthly)

Now its $349 with my car and hers with me and her on the policy. =(

Does any one know if you can say no when the insurance company asks if you had and recent traffic violations?

I had one recently (5 over) and I got a stay of Adjudication along with my reckless driving + exhibition driving I got a this early summer. So technically, I don't have any thing on my record?

Also could some one clear this up. So I got a reckless and a exhibition early summer. I had to go to two different courts but same county for each of them. They were two days apart and I was both offered a stay of adjudication.

So about 2 weeks ago I got nailed going 78 in a 65 but the cop dropped it to 65 in 60. I went to see the traffic officer and he offered me the same thing. No moving violations within 1 year and it won't go on my record. I don't know if its a stay of adjudication but it sounds like one.

So now my question is, since it says you have to be found guilty in order for the reckless + exhibition to go on your record. Would my current speeding ticket count as a guilty plea, even though I was offered the same term as my last tickets.
Old 10-18-2012 | 03:48 PM
  #8565  
ezpotato's Avatar
ezpotato
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 620
Likes: 1
jesus christ. cliff notes.

and stop driving. period.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:37 PM.