Intake and Exhaust The ultimate forum to ask, discuss, and answer tech related questions regarding MyG37 intake and exhaust.

Mishimoto Intake Tubes vs Stock

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-16-2013 | 10:52 AM
  #61  
rks's Avatar
rks
Registered Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 49
From: SW OH
Originally Posted by thunder290
I just put the Mishimoto tubes on my 2010 G37x tonight and took it for a hard test ride. The only thing I noticed was that my wallet was lighter. I already had the K&N drop in filters and I have Tanabe a/b exhaust. The sound was the same from the exhaust and the intake. I paid $108 shipped on ebay. I guess it was worth a try. With that said...this car has impressive speed and acceleration regardless.
I have tubes with the K&N and I didn't notice much change either. I do have the ARK exhaust that could easily negate any perceived changes.
Old 04-16-2013 | 01:21 PM
  #62  
blnewt's Avatar
blnewt
Movin On!
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,877
Likes: 4,944
Originally Posted by tchoke
im on the fence buying this mod, im currently running stock just looking for more louder intake i guess to feed the fast and furious in me lol. im happy with the sound already stock on my sedan but just want it a touch louder would this little mod satisfy?
With those tubes you're already about a third of the way toward the price of a short-ram intake, this will give you the mean VQ sound. I love my SRI, cost about $280. Although the stock tubes aren't as pretty
Old 04-22-2013 | 09:00 AM
  #63  
Sweet Lew's Avatar
Sweet Lew
Registered Member
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 82
Likes: 2
From: Chicago, IL
Installed the Mishi tubes. Can't tell a bit of difference, but whateves, they were a gift. =D. Engine bay looks much nicer though.
The following users liked this post:
therzdae (06-11-2015)
Old 04-22-2013 | 06:13 PM
  #64  
g37flamer's Avatar
g37flamer
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 115
Likes: 2
thank for sharing
Old 05-18-2013 | 03:01 AM
  #65  
dragion's Avatar
dragion
Thread Starter
Registered Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 152
From: Boston, MA
Somebody should "grab" these!

Mishimoto:
https://www.myg37.com/forums/private...alifornia.html

aFe Filters:
https://www.myg37.com/forums/private...1-10196-a.html

Old 08-18-2013 | 09:54 AM
  #66  
Rochester's Avatar
Rochester
Administrator
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 19,244
Likes: 4,753
From: Rochester, NY
I was looking at my old air box components this morning after someone commented in that hood liner thread about intake noise, and remembered your thread here about these Mishimoto Intake Tubes, so I'm bumping it with info. One of the OEM flex-tubes has a 4-inch resonator hanging below it like a big, plastic tumor. I suspect removal of this resonator is why you hear a change in engine noise.
The following users liked this post:
dragion (08-18-2013)
Old 08-18-2013 | 08:06 PM
  #67  
Adam West's Avatar
Adam West
Registered Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 930
Likes: 38
Originally Posted by Rochester
I was looking at my old air box components this morning after someone commented in that hood liner thread about intake noise, and remembered your thread here about these Mishimoto Intake Tubes, so I'm bumping it with info. One of the OEM flex-tubes has a 4-inch resonator hanging below it like a big, plastic tumor. I suspect removal of this resonator is why you hear a change in engine noise.
Nope no change. I have these tubes installed and they sound just like stock, no noticeable different in sound.
Old 08-18-2013 | 10:48 PM
  #68  
dragion's Avatar
dragion
Thread Starter
Registered Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 152
From: Boston, MA
Looks like my G37xS is "SPECIAL"

Everyone I know who has heard my intake tells me that it has changed the note with the Mishimoto intake tubes and additional change with the aFe Pro S dry drop-in filters.
Can it be that they are all wrong?

If you have an aftermarket exhaust then I can understand...but with stock there should be a difference in sound & performance.

I'm not saying that it will be as drastic as an open air intake, but due to the air flow being less restricted then there will be an improvement over stock.

Both the Mishimoto & the aFe's contributes to this result.

This is only "my" results...others may vary.
Old 08-19-2013 | 11:27 PM
  #69  
Adam West's Avatar
Adam West
Registered Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 930
Likes: 38
Yea I dunno - I have the same setup with the AFE's, but didn't notice any significant sound change.
Old 08-23-2013 | 05:04 PM
  #70  
Todd Kieffer's Avatar
Todd Kieffer
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Well I just had to find out for myself, picked up a set of Z1 tubes on ebay today. We shall see if they make a difference or if dragion's G is really special.
Old 08-23-2013 | 07:51 PM
  #71  
fredrik94087's Avatar
fredrik94087
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 27
Likes: 1
I'm going to ask a silly question..or two.

First, why not dyno?

Second, why not time the 0-60?
Old 08-23-2013 | 08:26 PM
  #72  
Rochester's Avatar
Rochester
Administrator
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 19,244
Likes: 4,753
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by fredrik94087
I'm going to ask a silly question..or two.

First, why not dyno?

Second, why not time the 0-60?
Because even when assuming these things are an actual "power" mod, the measurable change would be so negligible as to not matter.

No offense, dragion
Old 08-23-2013 | 09:39 PM
  #73  
fredrik94087's Avatar
fredrik94087
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 27
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Rochester
Because even when assuming these things are an actual "power" mod, the measurable change would be so negligible as to not matter.

No offense, dragion
The math seems to be:
at 60mph, you are traveling 88feet/second. The g37 is 15.66'.
88/15.66=5.6194
1second/5.6914'=0.1779seconds per car length.
So, half a car length is around 0.1779/2=0.0889 seconds.

All things being equal, it means you are now doing 0-60mph 0.1 seconds quicker

Gee Fredrik...thanks!

Last edited by fredrik94087; 08-23-2013 at 10:31 PM. Reason: correction
The following users liked this post:
dragion (08-24-2013)
Old 08-23-2013 | 11:49 PM
  #74  
lightlypurified's Avatar
lightlypurified
Registered Member
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 288
Likes: 24
From: California
I thought id chime in this thread ive had my post maf for over 2 months now i bought a hps one not the mo****o and there was most D-E-F-I-N-I-T-E-L-Y a slight change in sound and exhaust note. The car seems suprisingly faster in hot weather conditions and yes im sure this will increase hp but to a minimal extent if you notice here on the pic below the oem restritive intake has a blank plastic container stuck at the buttom when i took a look at it there was nothing inside this was holding back some hp. I also have a k&n drop in filter.


Name:  NorthCoast-20130804-00177.jpg
Views: 2779
Size:  46.6 KB

Name:  NorthCoast-20130810-00189.jpg
Views: 2921
Size:  61.9 KB
The following users liked this post:
dragion (08-24-2013)
Old 08-24-2013 | 07:29 AM
  #75  
dragion's Avatar
dragion
Thread Starter
Registered Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 152
From: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by Rochester
No offense, dragion
None taken John.

I know that there are intakes that can actually cause HP loss, but people will install them just for the look & sound.

All I know is that my decision to add the Mishimoto/aFe combo has been a plus for me...an improvement is still an improvement, even if it is just slight!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:55 AM.