Intake and Exhaust The ultimate forum to ask, discuss, and answer tech related questions regarding MyG37 intake and exhaust.

Backpressure: The MYTH and Why It's Wrong

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2010 | 06:28 PM
  #1  
Mike's Avatar
Mike
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,549
Likes: 20
Backpressure: The MYTH and Why It's Wrong

Good read from another forum.

Backpressure: The myth and why it's wrong.

I. Introduction

One of the most misunderstood concepts in exhaust theory is backpressure. People love to talk about backpressure on message boards with no real understanding of what it is and what it's consequences are. I'm sure many of you have heard or read the phrase "Engines need backpressure" when discussing exhaust upgrades. That phrase is in fact completely inaccurate and a wholly misguided notion.

II. Some basic exhaust theory

Your exhaust system is designed to evacuate gases from the combustion chamber quickly and efficently. Exhaust gases are not produced in a smooth stream; exhaust gases originate in pulses. A 4 cylinder motor will have 4 distinct pulses per complete engine cycle, a 6 cylinder has 6 pules and so on. The more pulses that are produced, the more continuous the exhaust flow. Backpressure can be loosely defined as the resistance to positive flow - in this case, the resistance to positive flow of the exhaust stream.

III. Backpressure and velocity

Some people operate under the misguided notion that wider pipes are more effective at clearing the combustion chamber than narrower pipes. It's not hard to see how this misconception is appealing - wider pipes have the capability to flow more than narrower pipes. So if they have the ability to flow more, why isn't "wider is better" a good rule of thumb for exhaust upgrading? In a word - VELOCITY. I'm sure that all of you have at one time used a garden hose w/o a spray nozzle on it. If you let the water just run unrestricted out of the house it flows at a rather slow rate. However, if you take your finger and cover part of the opening, the water will flow out at a much much faster rate.

The astute exhaust designer knows that you must balance flow capacity with velocity. You want the exhaust gases to exit the chamber and speed along at the highest velocity possible - you want a FAST exhaust stream. If you have two exhaust pulses of equal volume, one in a 2" pipe and one in a 3" pipe, the pulse in the 2" pipe will be traveling considerably FASTER than the pulse in the 3" pipe. While it is true that the narrower the pipe, the higher the velocity of the exiting gases, you want make sure the pipe is wide enough so that there is as little backpressure as possible while maintaining suitable exhaust gas velocity. Backpressure in it's most extreme form can lead to reversion of the exhaust stream - that is to say the exhaust flows backwards, which is not good. The trick is to have a pipe that that is as narrow as possible while having as close to zero backpressure as possible at the RPM range you want your power band to be located at. Exhaust pipe diameters are best suited to a particular RPM range. A smaller pipe diameter will produce higher exhaust velocities at a lower RPM but create unacceptably high amounts of backpressure at high rpm. Thus if your powerband is located 2-3000 RPM you'd want a narrower pipe than if your powerband is located at 8-9000RPM.

Many engineers try to work around the RPM specific nature of pipe diameters by using setups that are capable of creating a similar effect as a change in pipe diameter on the fly. The most advanced is Ferrari's which consists of two exhaust paths after the header - at low RPM only one path is open to maintain exhaust velocity, but as RPM climbs and exhaust volume increases, the second path is opened to curb backpressure - since there is greater exhaust volume there is no loss in flow velocity. BMW and Nissan use a simpler and less effective method - there is a single exhaust path to the muffler; the muffler has two paths; one path is closed at low RPM but both are open at high RPM.

IV. So how did this myth come to be?

I often wonder how the myth "Hondas need backpressure" came to be. Mostly I believe it is a misunderstanding of what is going on with the exhaust stream as pipe diameters change. For instance, someone with a civic decides he's going to uprade his exhaust with a 3" diameter piping. Once it's installed the owner notices that he seems to have lost a good bit of power throughout the powerband. He makes the connections in the following manner: "My wider exhaust eliminated all backpressure but I lost power, therefore the motor must need some backpressure in order to make power." What he did not realize is that he killed off all his flow velocity by using such a ridiculously wide pipe. It would have been possible for him to achieve close to zero backpressure with a much narrower pipe - in that way he would not have lost all his flow velocity.

V. So why is exhaust velocity so important?

The faster an exhaust pulse moves, the better it can scavenge out all of the spent gasses during valve overlap. The guiding principles of exhaust pulse scavenging are a bit beyond the scope of this doc but the general idea is a fast moving pulse creates a low pressure area behind it. This low pressure area acts as a vacuum and draws along the air behind it. A similar example would be a vehicle traveling at a high rate of speed on a dusty road. There is a low pressure area immediately behind the moving vehicle - dust particles get sucked into this low pressure area causing it to collect on the back of the vehicle. This effect is most noticeable on vans and hatchbacks which tend to create large trailing low pressure areas - giving rise to the numerous "wash me please" messages written in the thickly collected dust on the rear door(s).

VI. Conclusion.

SO it turns out that Engines don't need backpressure, they need as high a flow velocity as possible with as little backpressure as possible


Reason for write-up - I was getting tired of people saying a 3" exhaust would benefit from a stock motor.
The following 5 users liked this post by Mike:
Bravo at (04-16-2016), dbeachy1 (07-22-2017), hooey_b (10-18-2015), infiniticarplug (06-26-2021), Nosnibor (09-30-2014)
Old 03-24-2010 | 06:33 PM
  #2  
Raizon's Avatar
Raizon
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Wow...excellent write-up! Deserves a sticky!
Old 03-24-2010 | 06:53 PM
  #3  
RISKY GUY's Avatar
RISKY GUY
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,078
Likes: 43
I agree my friend has an 05 coupe with 3" aam exhaust with test pipes.

down low he losses some power,but up top he walks stock 37s.

it sounds like a monster.
Old 03-24-2010 | 07:32 PM
  #4  
Modme's Avatar
Modme
Registered Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,585
Likes: 80
From: So Cal
Yup, great article for N/A cars. But for turboed cars, all that goes out the window.
Old 03-24-2010 | 08:14 PM
  #5  
Mike's Avatar
Mike
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,549
Likes: 20
Originally Posted by Modme
Yup, great article for N/A cars. But for turboed cars, all that goes out the window.
You don't think exhaust velocity is important for a turbo car? It's even more important, as that determines your spool-up. Why do you think a WRX gains a quicker spool and more power from gutting the up-pipe cat?
Old 03-25-2010 | 01:56 AM
  #6  
TheLocNar's Avatar
TheLocNar
Registered Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 66
From: Chicagoish
Like I tell my ex girlfriends... easy in/easy out.
Old 03-25-2010 | 02:06 AM
  #7  
STOOF's Avatar
STOOF
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,909
Likes: 7
From: Staten Island, NY
Awesome read. This def deserves a sticky.
Old 03-25-2010 | 02:45 AM
  #8  
Modme's Avatar
Modme
Registered Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,585
Likes: 80
From: So Cal
Originally Posted by Mike
You don't think exhaust velocity is important for a turbo car? It's even more important, as that determines your spool-up. Why do you think a WRX gains a quicker spool and more power from gutting the up-pipe cat?
Well, your article is mainly talking about catback exhausts. For turboed cars, velocity is needed upstream of the turbos, which is usually in the headers. However, downstream of the turbos, no velocity is necessary. You just want to eliminate any restriction.
The following users liked this post:
hooey_b (10-18-2015)
Old 03-25-2010 | 02:56 AM
  #9  
Mike's Avatar
Mike
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,549
Likes: 20
Originally Posted by Modme
Well, your article is mainly talking about catback exhausts. For turboed cars, velocity is needed upstream of the turbos, which is usually in the headers. However, downstream of the turbos, no velocity is necessary. You just want to eliminate any restriction.
The write-up refers to any and all backpressure on the exhaust side of the engine. Although it doesn't specifically mention turbo manifolds, it is directly applicable. Why do you think Log manifolds typically underperform vs tubular manifolds, which typically underperform vs equal length manifolds, which will typically underperform vs a divided equal length manifold? Backpressure is backpressure, regardless of if there is a turbo in the exhaust system or not. Nowhere in the article does it mention a catback exhaust. It does, however, go down to the pulse level, which would originate directly out of the engine and into the collector.

Do you have any experience at all with serious modifications and the physics/theory behind them? Every post you make just makes you lose credibility; bolt-ons do not count.
Old 03-25-2010 | 03:02 AM
  #10  
Mike's Avatar
Mike
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,549
Likes: 20
This discussion extends beyond the scope of the OP. Lets take it to PM, or start another thread.
Old 03-25-2010 | 03:34 AM
  #11  
TJHG37S's Avatar
TJHG37S
Registered User
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,408
Likes: 0
From: L.A.
I have to agree here, turbo cars need little to no restriction. My experience modding 3 turbo cars previously has proven this. a 3" will outgain a 2.5" across the powerband in almost all turbo applications.

Originally Posted by Modme
Well, your article is mainly talking about catback exhausts. For turboed cars, velocity is needed upstream of the turbos, which is usually in the headers. However, downstream of the turbos, no velocity is necessary. You just want to eliminate any restriction.
Old 03-25-2010 | 04:06 AM
  #12  
Mike's Avatar
Mike
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,549
Likes: 20
for an exhaust, yes. manifold, not necessarily.
Old 03-25-2010 | 05:03 AM
  #13  
G37Sam's Avatar
G37Sam
Administrator
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 12,184
Likes: 243
From: Doha, Qatar
Mike, your posts never fail to impress!

Stickied
Old 03-25-2010 | 06:57 AM
  #14  
Ivoidwarranties's Avatar
Ivoidwarranties
Premier Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,078
Likes: 28
From: Omaha
Mike, great post. I've been watching the same postings and thinking the same thing the last few days, "backpressure" is being mis-used because it is not understood. I'm running out the door right now but I'll try to add a link to a great article about collectors later. The exhaust collector, how it's shaped, how long it is, where it's located, is very very important when it comes to velocity of the exhaust.
Old 03-25-2010 | 08:04 AM
  #15  
G37Sam's Avatar
G37Sam
Administrator
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 12,184
Likes: 243
From: Doha, Qatar
Then why does it "hurt" performance when going from an x-pipe setup to a straight pipe setup in the catback? (given the same piping diameter)


Quick Reply: Backpressure: The MYTH and Why It's Wrong



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:32 PM.