G37 Sedan

Trade in for RS Q50?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-28-2016, 12:18 PM
  #16  
r2dmax
Registered User
 
r2dmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Charlotte, NC from OH thru VA
Posts: 739
Received 71 Likes on 65 Posts
I'm a Bimmer guy coming over to the G37. An E39 M5 properly sorted is an almost unmatched drive. Yes, there are faster cars now, but overall the feels!! I would possibly be willing to go with a Q50RS depending on M5 mileage and what major service it may need soon.
Old 11-28-2016, 08:31 PM
  #17  
Mattlorentzoe
Premier Member

iTrader: (4)
 
Mattlorentzoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Gwinnett County, Georgia
Posts: 773
Received 156 Likes on 119 Posts
Originally Posted by r2dmax
I'm a Bimmer guy coming over to the G37. An E39 M5 properly sorted is an almost unmatched drive. Yes, there are faster cars now, but overall the feels!! I would possibly be willing to go with a Q50RS depending on M5 mileage and what major service it may need soon.
That's the same problem I have with mine.... never buying a 7at from Infiniti/Nissan ever again
Old 11-29-2016, 07:38 AM
  #18  
Daddy Fat Sacs
Registered Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Daddy Fat Sacs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Tampa
Posts: 1,705
Received 357 Likes on 249 Posts
Well its not the same tranny in the Q as the G, the only issue with it was the responsiveness or lack of with the paddle shifters. As for the tranny, no lag, no harsh down shifts or sluggish feeling at all. I had the Q50RS as a loaner for almost a week.
Old 11-29-2016, 08:14 AM
  #19  
the93owner
Registered Member
 
the93owner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,397
Received 335 Likes on 261 Posts
Originally Posted by Daddy Fat Sacs
Well its not the same tranny in the Q as the G, the only issue with it was the responsiveness or lack of with the paddle shifters. As for the tranny, no lag, no harsh down shifts or sluggish feeling at all. I had the Q50RS as a loaner for almost a week.
I think it is the same transmission, both use the RE7R01A 7-speed automatic. It may just be programmed differently for different applications.
Old 11-29-2016, 08:28 AM
  #20  
ANMVQ
Registered Member
iTrader: (13)
 
ANMVQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Framingham Ma,
Posts: 6,098
Received 394 Likes on 343 Posts
I just returned a Redsport( loaner) I had for 2 days and no way is the tranny the same, mine almost shifted like my 09 G37 tuned. The shifts in Sport+ with firm and fast( paddles 100% for two days). The only thing I didn't like is it wouldn't engine brake on down shifts as much as my 09. I'm thinking because the gearing is different. But I would trade mine in for one( wife said no tho) LOL

but the thing rips!

And lets remember our tranny is only good for 330 WHTQ or so. They wouldn't use that in the redsport as the WTRQ is too close to that
Old 11-29-2016, 08:57 AM
  #21  
the93owner
Registered Member
 
the93owner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,397
Received 335 Likes on 261 Posts
Trade in for RS Q50?-vipvwdm.jpg


Trade in for RS Q50?-jarbfrl.jpg


Are they not the same transmission models?
The following users liked this post:
ANMVQ (11-29-2016)
Old 11-29-2016, 10:36 AM
  #22  
xscoupe1985
Registered Member
 
xscoupe1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by booster
I've had a problem withe the rear timing cover gasket failing on my 2010 G37. The car is currently at the shop getting fixed.
I just received an invite from Inifiniti to a 3 day private day sale claiming up to $10,500 off 2016 Q50s.
I've been considering trading in the G37 and my 2000 M5 for a new Q50 Red Sport. The MSRP on a RedSport is $54K - $10K discount - $20K for trade-ins puts me at around $26K + fees and tax...tempting
Thoughts? Not realistic? This is Canadian pricing, BTW.
The underrated HP numbers make it very tempting.
Might wanna make sure the$10k off pertains to the red sport. Most manufacturers don't include their top tier car in those kind of deals
Old 11-29-2016, 12:02 PM
  #23  
canucklehead
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
canucklehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: West Coast Canada
Posts: 1,450
Received 142 Likes on 125 Posts
Originally Posted by xscoupe1985
Might wanna make sure the$10k off pertains to the red sport. Most manufacturers don't include their top tier car in those kind of deals
^ posts #9 and 12 above address your point. i had the same thought as you which is why i checked.
Old 11-29-2016, 02:00 PM
  #24  
ANMVQ
Registered Member
iTrader: (13)
 
ANMVQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Framingham Ma,
Posts: 6,098
Received 394 Likes on 343 Posts
If the trans are the same,( not upgraded internals) the first guy that flashes the car will need a tranny :/.
Old 11-29-2016, 02:08 PM
  #25  
qmantran
Registered Member
 
qmantran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: ATX
Posts: 1,144
Received 181 Likes on 141 Posts
Originally Posted by ANMVQ
If the trans are the same,( not upgraded internals) the first guy that flashes the car will need a tranny :/.
Can you explain
Old 11-29-2016, 04:16 PM
  #26  
crazjayz
Registered Member
 
crazjayz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 499
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by qmantran
Can you explain
What ANMVQ is saying is that the RE7R01A can handle a max tq of 330 lb/ft or so at the wheels. The Q50RS is listed as 350 lb/ft, which is ~300 lb/ft at the wheels. Any engine tuning of the Q50RS will easily bump that to over 330 lb/ft at the wheels, thus placing the transmission in a area of increased failure. Hence, anyone who flashes this car will need a new transmission.

The transmission has long been the Achilles heel of this car, either in G37/Q50 or in Q50 form. I've wondered why they didn't use the transmission from the M56, as that car puts out 417 lb/ft of torque.

Last edited by crazjayz; 11-29-2016 at 04:21 PM.
The following users liked this post:
ANMVQ (12-01-2016)
Old 11-29-2016, 05:38 PM
  #27  
booster
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
booster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 106
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by canucklehead
^ posts #9 and 12 above address your point. i had the same thought as you which is why i checked.
I had confirmed this at the dealer, and had it documented on paper ($10,500 discount).

I think you guys are missing the point about the transmission in RedSport.
At this power level a nice shifting automatic transmission isn't good enough.
This model badly needs a DSG or manual, or something else, but what it received (the same gtransmission as every other Q50 model, maybe tuned but still the same).
Let me put it this way, the first time I drove the e39 M5 I had a **** eating grin on my face and right away though I gotta have one.
The first time I drove the RedSport, i was like meh, it's nice, a lot of power, but no soul, just blah.
Old 11-29-2016, 06:05 PM
  #28  
eljoker
Registered User
 
eljoker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,221
Received 192 Likes on 125 Posts
Originally Posted by crazjayz
What ANMVQ is saying is that the RE7R01A can handle a max tq of 330 lb/ft or so at the wheels. The Q50RS is listed as 350 lb/ft, which is ~300 lb/ft at the wheels. Any engine tuning of the Q50RS will easily bump that to over 330 lb/ft at the wheels, thus placing the transmission in a area of increased failure. Hence, anyone who flashes this car will need a new transmission.

The transmission has long been the Achilles heel of this car, either in G37/Q50 or in Q50 form. I've wondered why they didn't use the transmission from the M56, as that car puts out 417 lb/ft of torque.
The thing is that they already proved inputs 350lbs to the wheels. Stollen, FI and I believe Z1 has dumps for it. I was told it was an updated transmission. Not new but updated. Who knows what they really touched.
Old 12-01-2016, 01:15 AM
  #29  
Ricio1991
Registered Member
 
Ricio1991's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Tempe,AZ
Posts: 1,301
Received 113 Likes on 102 Posts
I almost traded in my sedan for a premium 3.0t today. They were giving me the pay off on my sedan which was insane because it's not even worth the 17k I owe on it. Only reason I didn't was because it was a lease 499 a mo with 15k miles per year and I don't know if I was able to handle that payment and also insurance for it since I only pay 120 for my g. Man I wish I would of been got it I would had to pay the taxes, first mo and also taxes and fees
Old 12-01-2016, 08:30 AM
  #30  
ANMVQ
Registered Member
iTrader: (13)
 
ANMVQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Framingham Ma,
Posts: 6,098
Received 394 Likes on 343 Posts
Originally Posted by Ricio1991
I almost traded in my sedan for a premium 3.0t today. They were giving me the pay off on my sedan which was insane because it's not even worth the 17k I owe on it. Only reason I didn't was because it was a lease 499 a mo with 15k miles per year and I don't know if I was able to handle that payment and also insurance for it since I only pay 120 for my g. Man I wish I would of been got it I would had to pay the taxes, first mo and also taxes and fees
God the 499 is insane man. Right now here in MA they have a sign and drive a true 0 out of pocket on the 3.0T Premium and its on 349 a month. Sounds like they may have rolled you trade in into the price?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:24 PM.