G37 Sedan

Poor G :(

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-12-2012, 01:19 AM
  #151  
sniper27
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
sniper27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: S. Cal
Posts: 2,824
Received 79 Likes on 72 Posts
Originally Posted by visualguy
What aspects of the driving experience on the G aren't as smooth as on the BMW? In what way are they not "smooth"?

I find the automatic 2012 G37 to be totally fine in terms of smoothness.

The 6MT isn't so great, mostly because of the short engagement point of the clutch - but I don't know if that's any better on the BMW. There's also the shifter vibration which is somewhat surprising, but not something that affects the driving really.

By the way, I find steep hill starts to be quite annoying on the 6MT because of the double whammy of an abrupt clutch engagement point, and a weak hand brake. Really bad match for San Francisco...
power delivery, transmission, overall handling, steering response, just the general refinement of the car, low end torque.
Old 03-12-2012, 01:20 AM
  #152  
kanariya
Registered User
 
kanariya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: nyc
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by visualguy
What aspects of the driving experience on the G aren't as smooth as on the BMW? In what way are they not "smooth"?

I find the automatic 2012 G37 to be totally fine in terms of smoothness.

The 6MT isn't so great, mostly because of the short engagement point of the clutch - but I don't know if that's any better on the BMW. There's also the shifter vibration which is somewhat surprising, but not something that affects the driving really.

By the way, I find steep hill starts to be quite annoying on the 6MT because of the double whammy of an abrupt clutch engagement point, and a weak hand brake. Really bad match for San Francisco...
a few common complains from the G owners.

- Throttle lag
- Jerky 7AT
- Rattling and seat bubbles
Old 03-12-2012, 07:55 PM
  #153  
g37guy01
Registered User
 
g37guy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Where the Sopranos and Saguaros are
Posts: 1,080
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by visualguy
What aspects of the driving experience on the G aren't as smooth as on the BMW? In what way are they not "smooth"?

I find the automatic 2012 G37 to be totally fine in terms of smoothness.

The 6MT isn't so great, mostly because of the short engagement point of the clutch - but I don't know if that's any better on the BMW. There's also the shifter vibration which is somewhat surprising, but not something that affects the driving really.

By the way, I find steep hill starts to be quite annoying on the 6MT because of the double whammy of an abrupt clutch engagement point, and a weak hand brake. Really bad match for San Francisco...
Yes, I've had experiences on those hills with my manual.
Old 03-12-2012, 08:40 PM
  #154  
visualguy
Registered User
 
visualguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by g37guy01
Yes, I've had experiences on those hills with my manual.
Really steep hills suck for manuals in general. The G seems particularly challenging on this front, but I haven't tried the BMW. Hard to get steep hill starts on the G without some clutch burn, and hard to avoid the occasional engine bucking or even stall.

I dread the possibility of getting stuck in stop-and-go traffic on a steep road driving my G37S 6MT - seems like a potentially clutch-destroying and engine-damaging (due to bucking) experience...
Old 03-13-2012, 10:25 AM
  #155  
accohn12
Registered User
 
accohn12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2012 Audi A4 vs. 2012 BMW 328i vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz C250 Comparison Test

Saw this article on Edmunds.com, comparing 4 Cyl Sport Sedans (A4, C250, 328i), and I couldn't help thinking that for roughly the same money, I would get a loaded G37xS all day every day. And yes, I realize I'm probably a bit biased.
Old 03-13-2012, 10:38 AM
  #156  
kanariya
Registered User
 
kanariya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: nyc
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by accohn12
2012 Audi A4 vs. 2012 BMW 328i vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz C250 Comparison Test

Saw this article on Edmunds.com, comparing 4 Cyl Sport Sedans (A4, C250, 328i), and I couldn't help thinking that for roughly the same money, I would get a loaded G37xS all day every day. And yes, I realize I'm probably a bit biased.
Infiniti needs to do something quick. They are being left out in their competitor's comparison test.
Old 03-13-2012, 10:53 AM
  #157  
accohn12
Registered User
 
accohn12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well it was an article comparing only 4 cyl cars, so the G wasn't applicable.
Old 03-13-2012, 11:06 AM
  #158  
kanariya
Registered User
 
kanariya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: nyc
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by accohn12
well it was an article comparing only 4 cyl cars, so the G wasn't applicable.
Which is saying Infiniti is missing out the big 4 market.
Old 03-13-2012, 02:05 PM
  #159  
Amon_Ra
Registered User
 
Amon_Ra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
those numbers on the 328i, if accurate, are pretty impressive...didn't realize it was that quick
Old 03-13-2012, 05:43 PM
  #160  
00Max00
Registered User
 
00Max00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Amon_Ra
those numbers on the 328i, if accurate, are pretty impressive...didn't realize it was that quick
Want real fast T4? Look no further than Evo and STi.
Old 03-13-2012, 06:06 PM
  #161  
jddssc121
Registered User
 
jddssc121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by visualguy
Really steep hills suck for manuals in general. The G seems particularly challenging on this front, but I haven't tried the BMW. Hard to get steep hill starts on the G without some clutch burn, and hard to avoid the occasional engine bucking or even stall.

I dread the possibility of getting stuck in stop-and-go traffic on a steep road driving my G37S 6MT - seems like a potentially clutch-destroying and engine-damaging (due to bucking) experience...
hill start assist on my WRX makes these a breeze
Old 03-13-2012, 09:22 PM
  #162  
g37guy01
Registered User
 
g37guy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Where the Sopranos and Saguaros are
Posts: 1,080
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by 00Max00
Want real fast T4? Look no further than Evo and STi.
They are not considered ELLPS.
Old 03-13-2012, 10:36 PM
  #163  
00Max00
Registered User
 
00Max00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
328i EPA - 23 city/34 highway/27 combined
Observed - 23.6 mpg over 1,455 miles. Worse than my V6 Maxima. EPA numbers are always inflated big time on turbo 4 bangers.

And... $50,745 for a 4 banger, seriously??

Last edited by 00Max00; 03-13-2012 at 10:42 PM.
Old 03-13-2012, 11:32 PM
  #164  
g37guy01
Registered User
 
g37guy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Where the Sopranos and Saguaros are
Posts: 1,080
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by 00Max00
328i EPA - 23 city/34 highway/27 combined
Observed - 23.6 mpg over 1,455 miles. Worse than my V6 Maxima. EPA numbers are always inflated big time on turbo 4 bangers.

And... $50,745 for a 4 banger, seriously??
How much is Lotus Elise?

They probably flogged the thing. When I was flogging my G, in my flogging stage after the break in I was getting a good 18 mpg, if that. In the meantime the thing is almost as fast as the G, which I'm sure 36 mpg can be had if one doesn't flog the thing.
Old 03-14-2012, 10:37 AM
  #165  
00Max00
Registered User
 
00Max00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by g37guy01
How much is Lotus Elise?

They probably flogged the thing. When I was flogging my G, in my flogging stage after the break in I was getting a good 18 mpg, if that. In the meantime the thing is almost as fast as the G, which I'm sure 36 mpg can be had if one doesn't flog the thing.
MSRPs are very close in $50K range, but keep in mind that they are very different cars target very different markets. No one would cross shopping these two. Apple to orange again, buddy?

I am not going to reject your assumption of "flog driving", as we definitely will see more reports of real-world mpg. But with complaints already floating around EPA's unrealistic mpg rating on turbo 4s, the Edmund's observation is legitimate in my book, but we will see...


Quick Reply: Poor G :(



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:31 PM.