G37 Sedan

new 328 is out, close to pricing of 2012 G37

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-2012, 08:18 PM
  #61  
g37guy01
Registered User
 
g37guy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Where the Sopranos and Saguaros are
Posts: 1,080
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Micron
*opens thread*

Still sees a Bangle-bottomed, FI atrocity (As far as Bimmers are concerned, since their old saying was that FI was a crutch for proper engineering)

*walks back out*
They didn't have a choice, it was FI or nothing. Wait till we see what Infiniti has up their sleeve. I would be real surprised to see a n/a v6 engine in the next generation G. They need to decrease pollutants and up the gas mileage.
g37guy01 is offline  
Old 02-21-2012, 08:51 PM
  #62  
CodeG
Registered User
 
CodeG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Beer Magazine
You are getting 28mpg on the freeway down hill...the G doesn't seem to be able to get much over 20...and I'm not sure i'm getting that. I live in Socal which is relatively flat too.
I've gotten 28mpg with the G, and I live in Socal. But you wont get that running in traffics of Socal, even with 328 4cyl.
CodeG is offline  
Old 02-21-2012, 08:55 PM
  #63  
Mocoso
Registered User
 
Mocoso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Southern California
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BTW if we are comparing wouldnt a 328 actually compare closer to a G25 and not a G37? the 2K difference suddenly becomes a 2K+ premium on the Beemer
Mocoso is offline  
Old 02-21-2012, 08:57 PM
  #64  
00Max00
Registered User
 
00Max00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by g37guy01
I don't know where you live, but where I live there are no canyons-carving, 150-mile test loops. And yes, I think beating the crap out of a turbo for a 150 miles, 16.8 mpg is impressive. Try that on the G that is maybe only slightly faster and probably doesn't handle as well and see if you even get 16.8.
Just make a correction, the G is not SLIGHTLY faster, it was a confirmed 5.0 sec car, while the new 328i is 5.7s, only true when you call 0.7s difference SLIGHTLY. It even faster than the new 335i which is 5.3s.
00Max00 is offline  
Old 02-21-2012, 08:59 PM
  #65  
g37guy01
Registered User
 
g37guy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Where the Sopranos and Saguaros are
Posts: 1,080
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Mocoso
BTW if we are comparing wouldnt a 328 actually compare closer to a G25 and not a G37? the 2K difference suddenly becomes a 2K+ premium on the Beemer
Gas mileage it would be closer to the G25, performance it would be closer to the G37.
g37guy01 is offline  
Old 02-21-2012, 10:08 PM
  #66  
blnewt
Movin On!
iTrader: (13)
 
blnewt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 24,877
Received 4,943 Likes on 4,176 Posts
Originally Posted by Mocoso
BMW needs to do a lot more to win me back like make their damn cars "serviceable" and "reliable" - bottom line is their reliability is POS and hell no will I buy a "turbo" from a manuf. who doesnt know how to make cars last past the lease period and who sends me to Avis rentacar for "loaners" - Infinity is a much better value proposition and if weight, torque, and response is the only factor hell Ill take a C6 over a 3 series any day... and yes I owned a 330i for 11 yrs - believe me their reliability takes a dump as the car ages...
Well said, IME it's great to get a BMW as a CPO and dump it when the CPO warranty is up then get another CPO. You won't pay the new premium and won't be hung out to dry when those big ticket items start crapping out (and they will). Great cars when they're under warranty (and you live relatively close to a BMW dealer). Test drove the 135i w/ DCT and that thing was a blast!
blnewt is offline  
Old 02-21-2012, 10:14 PM
  #67  
g37guy01
Registered User
 
g37guy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Where the Sopranos and Saguaros are
Posts: 1,080
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by 00Max00
Just make a correction, the G is not SLIGHTLY faster, it was a confirmed 5.0 sec car, while the new 328i is 5.7s, only true when you call 0.7s difference SLIGHTLY. It even faster than the new 335i which is 5.3s.
The G is not a confirmed 5 second car, as you cannot get it to 5 seconds without either dumping the clutch or killing the transmission. You don't know how fast the 328 is either. Even if it (the 328) is slightly slower, 36 mpg on the highway is nothing to sneeze at. And lastly you have to test the cars together, or else you end up with normalized results, which is not very useful for this type of discussion. And finally, the 328 is capable of being easily tuned.

Face it the 3.7L motor is fast becoming a dinosaur, thanks to new regulations. (I still love my G, but it's showing it's age)
g37guy01 is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 12:36 AM
  #68  
sniper27
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
sniper27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: S. Cal
Posts: 2,824
Received 79 Likes on 72 Posts
Originally Posted by 00Max00
Just make a correction, the G is not SLIGHTLY faster, it was a confirmed 5.0 sec car, while the new 328i is 5.7s, only true when you call 0.7s difference SLIGHTLY. It even faster than the new 335i which is 5.3s.
5 sec car? lol.
sniper27 is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 12:47 AM
  #69  
trcb777
Registered User
 
trcb777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
BMW seems to underrate the horsepower on their cars. I don't know about the new turbo 328I, but the 335i has more power then 300 and its more like 300 at the rear wheels plus has a ton of torque and for under $1000 it will run in the 12's.
trcb777 is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 01:38 AM
  #70  
lippstuh
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
lippstuh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 133
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
i think the 135i fully loaded is more comparable.... i really wanted a 335i but the $39 OTD for a '12 fully loaded G37S 6mt was too hard to pass up
lippstuh is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 06:20 AM
  #71  
JL.G37
Registered User
 
JL.G37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2009 Infiniti G37 S - Testing the 2009 Infiniti G37 sedan - Motor Trend
JL.G37 is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 06:33 AM
  #72  
gugarci
Registered User
 
gugarci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bergen County, NJ
Posts: 541
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Yes Motor Trend was the only test site that got 5.0 flat. Every other review I read got around 5.5 secs. In this C&D review the 09 G37 did it in 5.4 and the old 6 cyl 328i did it in 5.9.
2009 Infiniti G37 vs. BMW 328i, Audi A4, and Acura TL - Comparison Tests

In the link below from Inside Line it did it in 5.6. All very good 0-60 #'s and I'll say the same for new and old 328.
http://www.insideline.com/infiniti/g...7-journey.html

Handling is more important than over-all power specially in a track. That's why in an old Top Gear episode where they tested the 4.9 Mustang it was slower around the track than a Lotus Elan with a less power.

Last edited by gugarci; 02-22-2012 at 06:40 AM.
gugarci is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 09:01 AM
  #73  
00Max00
Registered User
 
00Max00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by gugarci
Yes Motor Trend was the only test site that got 5.0 flat. Every other review I read got around 5.5 secs. In this C&D review the 09 G37 did it in 5.4 and the old 6 cyl 328i did it in 5.9.
2009 Infiniti G37 vs. BMW 328i, Audi A4, and Acura TL - Comparison Tests
R&T got 5.1s & 13.6@105.6 1/4 mile, close enough. Looks like C&D needs to find a better day for their tests.
00Max00 is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 09:39 AM
  #74  
g37guy01
Registered User
 
g37guy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Where the Sopranos and Saguaros are
Posts: 1,080
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by 00Max00
R&T got 5.1s & 13.6@105.6 1/4 mile, close enough. Looks like C&D needs to find a better day for their tests.
It doesn't matter. Unless you can get 5.1 in your G it's not a 5.1 second car. The car is as fast as it can go without abusing the engine or powertrain. Dumping the clutch is not acceptable as not to many people will do it. A rolling 5-60 I would think is the best way to determine how fast a car is.
g37guy01 is offline  
Old 02-22-2012, 09:44 AM
  #75  
gugarci
Registered User
 
gugarci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bergen County, NJ
Posts: 541
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by 00Max00
R&T got 5.1s & 13.6@105.6 1/4 mile, close enough. Looks like C&D needs to find a better day for their tests.
I didn't look for that but unless you plan to drag your G 0-60 is BS. In fact right now I would easily trade a 0-60 times in the 6's for an extra 3-4 more MPG's. I never accelerate quick from a start, passing power is where I mainly use my car's HP.

If gas hit close to $5.00 a gallon this summer I'm going to loose my G. Right now I would rather drive a car with a combination of much better millage and great handling as oppose to power and handling. If I could afford a new 328i I would buy it since it quick enough and the 36 MPG's in the hwy. The best my G does on the hwy on extended trip is about 28mpg's, in the city the G is a gas pig.
gugarci is offline  


Quick Reply: new 328 is out, close to pricing of 2012 G37



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55 AM.