just visited acurazine for old times sake...
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: los angeles
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
just visited acurazine for old times sake...
and stopped by the 4th Gen TL page. noticed quite a bit of G37 bashing. interesting since i know quite a bit of us were once Acura faithfuls and we saw the light...
feel sorry for those poor guys...
feel sorry for those poor guys...
#3
Acuras are good cars, but their design, and FWD characteristics are a big turn off to me. They also don't offer anything sporty or in a two door that I would be interested in.
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What were they bashing the G for, being a good looking, good performing bargain?
Oh wait, I know what it must have been. The G doesn't smile at them all the time!
Oh wait, I know what it must have been. The G doesn't smile at them all the time!
#5
Registered User
For four years I owned a 3g TL....good looking car and very few problems. The 4g TL is another story - my gosh that thing is ugly...did not even give it a look before acquiring the G.
#6
Registered User
As others have mentioned, the 4G TL is techonologically a great car. When equipped with SH-AWD, it is a VERY capable car. It is unfortunate that they gave it such an unattractive exterior, which is why I didn't even consider it.
#7
Coming from a 3G tl-s I thought that car was beautiful. I would have possibly sticked with Acura if they hadn't effed up the 4g so much... I can just imagine how far acura would have gone if they had made a Two Door CL (3G TL BODY but 2 doors) with RWD.
Trending Topics
#8
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
I think the TL sedan has a much better value than the G37 sedan , i had a 2010 TL for couple days and wow that thing feels like pure luxury inside , very nice interior vs the G!!! Don't get me^^^ wrong i love my coupe but i only seen a few sedans on here that caught my attention ! TL has great value but like some said it's FUGLY! I like the previous TL type S! A spec a lot better ! But FWD FTL!
#9
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: los angeles
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
they were commenting on the electronics, navi, and overall ride as some weak points for the G.
I loved my 05TL 6MT as well but not as much as my G.
I loved my 05TL 6MT as well but not as much as my G.
#11
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: los angeles
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"The G is so passe...
__________________
2009 TL SH-AWD GRIGIO/UMBER TECH Pkg w/HPT on 19" alloys, splash guards, trunk tray, wind deflector, front plate and license frame, and Acura valve caps
previous vehicle a 2001 CL Satin Silver/Black W/NAV, spoiler, splash guards, wind deflector, wood gear shift ****, and 35% silver tint.'
This is what someone wrote on the forum in response to a post i wrote. can you believe this guy?
__________________
2009 TL SH-AWD GRIGIO/UMBER TECH Pkg w/HPT on 19" alloys, splash guards, trunk tray, wind deflector, front plate and license frame, and Acura valve caps
previous vehicle a 2001 CL Satin Silver/Black W/NAV, spoiler, splash guards, wind deflector, wood gear shift ****, and 35% silver tint.'
This is what someone wrote on the forum in response to a post i wrote. can you believe this guy?
#12
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: the Salty D(San Diego,CA)
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Both are nice cars, but the G looks more luxury than the TL(at a quick glance!) on the other hand you couldn't fit 20's on the TL with a drop, plus it look like a more advanced civic si! but none the less both really nice whips!