G37 Sedan

just visited acurazine for old times sake...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-2010, 10:14 AM
  #31  
devil2k
Registered Member
 
devil2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 336
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by RISKY GUY
I had a tl as a loaner when my wife's rdx would go in for service.
tl has nice leather, electronics are weak the navi is crap.

sh awd actually is good in bad weather.

I turned in the rdx, the dealer didn't have 1 single customer in the showroom.

a few salesman were commenting on my coupe,comenting on my cf & how sick it looked.
overheard one saying"why don't we have a sports coupe in our line"

answer, because you make fwd that has way to much torqe steer.
I agree that SH-AWD is good in bad weather but if that's my priority I wouldn't even have considered a car / sedan.

The only interesting cars Honda/Acura made, they killed them. The Civic TypeR, S2000, NSX and etc. Now their idea of sporty is either overpowered FWD with 270 hp (Accord coupe) or underpowered FWD hybrid (CRZ coupe).

They're great / reliable cars, and are sufficient for most people but they're just not performance cars. A buddy wanted a TL but I told him to test drive a G after he drove a TL. He ended up buying a G instead.
Old 11-03-2010, 11:00 AM
  #32  
BillPaul
Registered User
 
BillPaul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by robxc80
"The G is so passe...
__________________
2009 TL SH-AWD GRIGIO/UMBER TECH Pkg w/HPT on 19" alloys, splash guards, trunk tray, wind deflector, front plate and license frame, and Acura valve caps
previous vehicle a 2001 CL Satin Silver/Black W/NAV, spoiler, splash guards, wind deflector, wood gear shift ****, and 35% silver tint.'

This is what someone wrote on the forum in response to a post i wrote. can you believe this guy?
Actually, the over-done vehicle descriptions suggest that he has no identity other than his car. Possessing the car, of course, is purely a question of money.

Sad.
Old 11-04-2010, 08:27 AM
  #33  
KLB
Registered User
 
KLB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LOL.
This says it all "wind deflector, front plate and license frame"
Old 11-04-2010, 09:22 AM
  #34  
BillPaul
Registered User
 
BillPaul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KLB
LOL.
This says it all "wind deflector, front plate and license frame"
I also like "wood gear shift ****."
Old 11-04-2010, 09:48 AM
  #35  
cvroom
Registered User
 
cvroom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by KLB
LOL.
This says it all "wind deflector, front plate and license frame"
WTF? who thinks a 15 dollar add on is signifacant enough to list like that for a 35k car!?
Old 11-04-2010, 10:34 AM
  #36  
The Jewbag
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
The Jewbag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Jew York
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What thread was it
Old 11-05-2010, 12:29 AM
  #37  
robxc80
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
robxc80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: los angeles
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here is the post.

Questions before buying new 2010 TL - Page 2 - AcuraZine Community
Old 11-05-2010, 12:55 AM
  #38  
devil2k
Registered Member
 
devil2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 336
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
FWD biased AWD is simply just not sporty, period. They're great for snow though.
Old 11-05-2010, 09:24 AM
  #39  
328HP
Registered User
 
328HP's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well the G has nothing on the TL SHAWD 6MT, thats for sure. Even the 335i falls short in the twisties against that car. If you can get past the looks then I am all for getting that TL. Any other TL is just a pure waste of time.
Old 11-05-2010, 03:04 PM
  #40  
KLB
Registered User
 
KLB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But they are such happy cars! Look at that smile.


Old 11-05-2010, 06:43 PM
  #41  
BillPaul
Registered User
 
BillPaul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KLB
But they are such happy cars! Look at that smile.


It's not a smile. It's a very large bottle opener.

For very large bottles.
Old 11-05-2010, 06:51 PM
  #42  
RISKY GUY
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
RISKY GUY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,078
Received 43 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by devil2k
I agree that SH-AWD is good in bad weather but if that's my priority I wouldn't even have considered a car / sedan.

The only interesting cars Honda/Acura made, they killed them. The Civic TypeR, S2000, NSX and etc. Now their idea of sporty is either overpowered FWD with 270 hp (Accord coupe) or underpowered FWD hybrid (CRZ coupe).

They're great / reliable cars, and are sufficient for most people but they're just not performance cars. A buddy wanted a TL but I told him to test drive a G after he drove a TL. He ended up buying a G instead.
my wifes truck had the turbo woth the shsawd.
it is like infinitis,only the use magnet control system to regulate the awd with a heads up display in the dash cluster.

it being a truck with a curb weight of 4000+ pounds. It had potential if you just gave it some twaeks in the suspension, it would carve out the road like a hot knife through bitter.

if it was in the tl sh-awd it does handle just as good as the g37x. But for the car itself g37 has 5 sec flat with 7 speed auto. Tl is nowhere near that just bwcause of the extra weight.
Old 11-05-2010, 08:01 PM
  #43  
james0076ss
Registered Member
iTrader: (1)
 
james0076ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cali, SGV
Posts: 179
Received 1 Like on 1 Post


True, the front is just wrong, rather have an Accord becuase of it. But the back on the car is no tooo shabby, a little batmobilish.
Old 11-05-2010, 08:23 PM
  #44  
xlack
Registered Member
iTrader: (3)
 
xlack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 4,333
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
i think it's a love it or hate it thing for the looks.. at first i thought it was fffffuggglglglyy but the more i see it i think it's not too bad o.O
Old 11-06-2010, 12:32 AM
  #45  
financeman
Registered User
 
financeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by james0076ss


True, the front is just wrong, rather have an Accord becuase of it. But the back on the car is no tooo shabby, a little batmobilish.
Sorry....I disagree. The back is way over styled - way too many shapes, lines, and conflicting forms. Looks busy and a bit junky to me.


Quick Reply: just visited acurazine for old times sake...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:53 PM.