G37 Sedan

Anyone wish G37 gained tq instead of hp?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-22-2010 | 09:59 AM
  #1  
jwoods986's Avatar
jwoods986
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Anyone wish G37 gained tq instead of hp?

Applies to all G37s, but since I have a sedan, I'll post it here. When Infiniti went from the 3.5 to the 3.7, hp went up 22 but torque only went up 1. Now, that's great for marketing and all-out driving (1/4 mile runs seem to be about .2 quicker). But I'm guessing, since I haven't owned a G before, that for everyday, not going over 4000 rpm driving, that there isn't much of a difference. So I was wondering if anyone else feels that Infiniti should have increased the tq instead of hp with the displacement increase? Just thinking out loud.
Old 04-22-2010 | 10:03 AM
  #2  
hispeed-lowdrag's Avatar
hispeed-lowdrag
Registered Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,190
Likes: 5
From: Pensacola Beach, FL
yes it would have been nice if both went up proportionally, but in terms of everyday driving I go well over 4000 rpm every single time I drive...
Old 04-22-2010 | 10:20 AM
  #3  
freesurfer's Avatar
freesurfer
Registered Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
I go over 4,000 rpm every day and I'm trying hard not to. (break-in period).
Old 04-22-2010 | 10:23 AM
  #4  
freesurfer's Avatar
freesurfer
Registered Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
... but yes, I would love some more torque and would sacrifice some HP to get it.
Old 04-22-2010 | 10:31 AM
  #5  
JohnEnglish's Avatar
JohnEnglish
Registered Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 2
They did flatten out the torque curve quite a bit versus the VQ35HR.
Old 04-22-2010 | 10:40 AM
  #6  
da mayor's Avatar
da mayor
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,651
Likes: 36
From: Long Island, NY
270 torque is a lot to get out of a V6 motor before going FI.
Old 04-22-2010 | 11:38 AM
  #7  
jwoods986's Avatar
jwoods986
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by JohnEnglish
They did flatten out the torque curve quite a bit versus the VQ35HR.
Ah, ok. That was something I was thinking, even though peak tq didn't really increase, maybe they flattened the curve. Glad to hear that's what happened. Like I said, I haven't owned a G35, so I can't compare but it sounds like the 35 (especially the first-gen) was more peaky than the 37?

And yes, 270 lbs/ft of tq is good for a N/A V6. I realize it's not a V8, it needs to rev more, so I'm adjusting my driving accordingly. I was just spoiled by the RS6's 415 tq from 1950-5600 rpms.
Old 04-22-2010 | 11:45 AM
  #8  
LightsOut's Avatar
LightsOut
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 1
From: (323)-(909)
still... a little more torque wouldn't hurt
Old 04-22-2010 | 11:53 AM
  #9  
Remo101's Avatar
Remo101
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
I got an awesome mod to get loads of torque.



............ traded the G37 for a 2009 CTS-V 551 lbs torque. Sorry, had to do it.

Last edited by Remo101; 04-22-2010 at 12:23 PM.
Old 04-22-2010 | 12:20 PM
  #10  
G37Sam's Avatar
G37Sam
Administrator
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 12,184
Likes: 243
From: Doha, Qatar
In all fairness, they did bump up the redline as well meaning the powerband is larger now (you spend more time there), I dont know why everyone ignores that and just looks at numbers
Old 04-22-2010 | 12:34 PM
  #11  
The Jewbag's Avatar
The Jewbag
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
From: Jew York
Originally Posted by Remo101
I got an awesome mod to get loads of torque.



............ traded the G37 for a 2009 CTS-V 551 lbs torque. Sorry, had to do it.

I still hate you.
Old 04-22-2010 | 12:34 PM
  #12  
JohnEnglish's Avatar
JohnEnglish
Registered Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,504
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by G37Sam
I dont know why everyone ignores that and just looks at numbers
Bench racing
Old 04-22-2010 | 12:37 PM
  #13  
jwoods986's Avatar
jwoods986
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Remo101
I got an awesome mod to get loads of torque.



............ traded the G37 for a 2009 CTS-V 551 lbs torque. Sorry, had to do it.
Well that would certainly do it -lol. I test-drove a C63 and IS-F a couple weeks ago, and while the wheels of nonsense were turning in my head for a few days, crunching the numbers and all that, I realized I would right back into the maintenance hell that comes with those super sedans. A major reason I sold my RS6.

Anyway, it's apples to oranges. Those cars are a whole different can of worms to a G37. Compared to its actual competitors, i.e. C300, 328i, IS 350, etc., it's still the best choice, IMO.
Old 04-22-2010 | 12:50 PM
  #14  
Remo101's Avatar
Remo101
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by jwoods986
Well that would certainly do it -lol. I test-drove a C63 and IS-F a couple weeks ago, and while the wheels of nonsense were turning in my head for a few days, crunching the numbers and all that, I realized I would right back into the maintenance hell that comes with those super sedans. A major reason I sold my RS6.

Anyway, it's apples to oranges. Those cars are a whole different can of worms to a G37. Compared to its actual competitors, i.e. C300, 328i, IS 350, etc., it's still the best choice, IMO.
In it's class G37 is the best IMO as well. That's why I bought it. Dead sexy car.
Old 04-22-2010 | 02:10 PM
  #15  
Sunny G's Avatar
Sunny G
Registered Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 50
I feel we need more torque in our cars because once you get used to it, it seems to get slower and slower. this is the reason i will be Supercharging my sedan once the Still supercharger kit is released then i wouldnt mind enjoying the 340-360 ft lbs of torque (depending on how much boost is applied)


Quick Reply: Anyone wish G37 gained tq instead of hp?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:26 PM.