G37 Sedan

Anyone wish G37 gained tq instead of hp?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-22-2010 | 02:35 PM
  #16  
cvt's Avatar
cvt
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 8
From: Los Angeles
if torque was an issue then why not get a bare bones brand new 335i?
Old 04-22-2010 | 02:38 PM
  #17  
Gamedog's Avatar
Gamedog
Sam Rothstein
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 10,435
Likes: 8
From: Riverside/San Diego, CA
Because we arent douchebags lol
Old 04-22-2010 | 02:55 PM
  #18  
ExtraCrispy's Avatar
ExtraCrispy
Registered Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
I'm curious, which NA V6 produces the most torque (at least rpm)? I think this is one of the advantages of diesel, monstrous low end torque which you can feel and enjoy every day.
Old 04-22-2010 | 03:21 PM
  #19  
Alex57r's Avatar
Alex57r
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 523
Likes: 1
From: NYC
Take my 7500rpm horsepower away and give me 1500rpm torque! My car never sees 7500rpms anyway. If it was not for the crazy MPG killing gearing in our cars, they would never be anywhere close to fast.
Old 04-22-2010 | 03:46 PM
  #20  
Creepers's Avatar
Creepers
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 362
Likes: 1
From: philly
yah i think the torque should be close to the hp ratings. whats the use of a lot of horsepower if u cant turn the wheels fast enough?

but the G feels plenty torquey to me, maybe b/c my last ride has only 170 lbs/ft (acura tsx). the 135i's low end grunt must be nice...
Old 04-22-2010 | 03:54 PM
  #21  
TheLocNar's Avatar
TheLocNar
Registered Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 66
From: Chicagoish
I just wish the car would push out more tq that it already has, at lower RPM.
Old 04-22-2010 | 05:22 PM
  #22  
4wheelkillr's Avatar
4wheelkillr
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 24
Likes: 1
From: Denver, CO
nothing two extra cylinders couldn't handle!

That's one thing I miss about my mustang. The Mustang GT had 20 less HP but 70more ft. lbs of torque and as such it was very fun to drive. It's hard to beat that seat of the pants feeling you get from a high tq. vehicle.
Old 04-22-2010 | 05:55 PM
  #23  
cdso's Avatar
cdso
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
The way the G is set up, it's meant to be reved & pushed. Unfortunately, in todays traffic, that's not always possible. That's not to say more torque wouldn't be welcomed, but what did we expect with a bump in displacement of .2 L.
Old 04-22-2010 | 06:08 PM
  #24  
gdub172's Avatar
gdub172
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
I truly agree with having torque in the lower rpms. Nevertheless, the G is the best bang for the buck in it's class.

I think adding DI on the 3.7 would also have a better flow of torque, what do you guys think?
Old 04-22-2010 | 06:33 PM
  #25  
hadokenuh's Avatar
hadokenuh
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 535
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by gdub172
I truly agree with having torque in the lower rpms. Nevertheless, the G is the best bang for the buck in it's class.

I think adding DI on the 3.7 would also have a better flow of torque, what do you guys think?
That is something you'll see in the next gen. 350HP with 300lb/ft, still with 3.7L. Woot.
Old 04-22-2010 | 06:34 PM
  #26  
TheLocNar's Avatar
TheLocNar
Registered Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 66
From: Chicagoish
Originally Posted by cdso
The way the G is set up, it's meant to be reved & pushed. Unfortunately, in todays traffic, that's not always possible. That's not to say more torque wouldn't be welcomed, but what did we expect with a bump in displacement of .2 L.
400lb/ft TOARK!!!!!
Old 04-22-2010 | 07:23 PM
  #27  
gdub172's Avatar
gdub172
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by hadokenuh
That is something you'll see in the next gen. 350HP with 300lb/ft, still with 3.7L. Woot.
WOW! Those are pretty good gains by just adding DI!
Old 04-22-2010 | 10:51 PM
  #28  
G37Sam's Avatar
G37Sam
Administrator
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 12,184
Likes: 243
From: Doha, Qatar
Originally Posted by hadokenuh
That is something you'll see in the next gen. 350HP with 300lb/ft, still with 3.7L. Woot.
Where'd you get those numbers from?
Old 04-22-2010 | 11:01 PM
  #29  
xlack's Avatar
xlack
Registered Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,333
Likes: 2
From: Singapore
hell no.. it's all about HP
Old 04-22-2010 | 11:10 PM
  #30  
hadokenuh's Avatar
hadokenuh
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 535
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by G37Sam
Where'd you get those numbers from?

All in my head


Quick Reply: Anyone wish G37 gained tq instead of hp?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:32 PM.