Why is Nissan's VQ V6 so fast compared to more powerful cars?
#1
Why is Nissan's VQ V6 so fast compared to more powerful cars?
I found this forum entertaining on MotorTrend.com.
Why is Nissan's VQ V6 so fast compared to more powerful cars? - Motor Trend The General Forum Forum
Why is Nissan's VQ V6 so fast compared to more powerful cars? - Motor Trend The General Forum Forum
#2
I can only take it in small doses. It'f funny for a few posts then it just becomes frustration that so many people are ignorant and stupid. Then again, that's the case with many forums. There will usually be a few people who know what they're talking about, like that jaws guys, but then the idiots drown them out.
#3
God the amout of mis-informed people commenting is just killing me, I couldn't take it past the first page I had to hit that x-button.
Drag coefficient.. Really??
They need moderators in that place lol
Drag coefficient.. Really??
They need moderators in that place lol
#4
I loled at this
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
When life throws you a curve, downshift and take it vigorously.
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Trending Topics
#11
that whole thread was retarded. My IQ dropped 5 points after reading all three pages, and I can't afford to lose any more. I want some free easter oil for my troubles, and all samples of all other seasonal/religous oils that Nissan produces. (whoops - that was from this thread: https://www.myg37.com/forums/g37-sed...e-service.html)
Anyway, that MT car was ringer. I've **never** heard of a G37 getting those kinds of numbers - all the other mags have it at 5.2-5.8, 13.7-14.xx. So the MT car was an anomaly, as far as I'm concerned. This has been discussed on other forums, and they seem to point to a lot of discrepancies in MT's testing procedures.
Anyway, that MT car was ringer. I've **never** heard of a G37 getting those kinds of numbers - all the other mags have it at 5.2-5.8, 13.7-14.xx. So the MT car was an anomaly, as far as I'm concerned. This has been discussed on other forums, and they seem to point to a lot of discrepancies in MT's testing procedures.
Last edited by ozzypriest; 11-26-2009 at 07:38 PM.
#12
I just read threads like that for kicks.
My favorite part of the thread.......
Nissan has a strong tendancy to lie about their power output.................
Please Neil Z... you right.
When Titan bring to market with 5.6 liter V8 and 305 hp, manny magazines say that number is underrated.
The same thing with the 3.8 V6 biturbo of GT-R. Some magazine (Motortrend) say it has al least 510 hp...
In other hand, GM and Ford always say their engines has more power that it has. Like the 1.8 liter 140 hp in the Chevy Cruze, even with a six speed trany, feels slower that a Tiida.
About the primary question, i think is problem with suspension settings. The 300C and Charger has Mercedes E platform, the engine is great, looks great... but still bit the dust...
Did you learn english from MTV or something? Jesus.
Please Neil Z... you right.
When Titan bring to market with 5.6 liter V8 and 305 hp, manny magazines say that number is underrated.
The same thing with the 3.8 V6 biturbo of GT-R. Some magazine (Motortrend) say it has al least 510 hp...
In other hand, GM and Ford always say their engines has more power that it has. Like the 1.8 liter 140 hp in the Chevy Cruze, even with a six speed trany, feels slower that a Tiida.
About the primary question, i think is problem with suspension settings. The 300C and Charger has Mercedes E platform, the engine is great, looks great... but still bit the dust...
Did you learn english from MTV or something? Jesus.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SuicidalG37SGuy
Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
8
09-10-2015 07:01 AM