Q60 Final Teaser - Revealed in Detroit
The following 2 users liked this post by User 122320:
chilibowl (06-23-2015),
evil-G-nius (06-22-2015)
#587
Premier Member
iTrader: (25)
I would just move on from this platform. Way to many high performance options out there right now from many other car companies. Even if and when this comes out it won't be anything like we hope. It will be heavy and underpowered. Nissan is going into the 8th year of this coupe and the only thing that has changed is now its called a Q. My car is payed in full but I am waiting for a turbo kit to be released. If it wasn't for that I would of traded it in and be rolling some American muscle
#588
Registered Member
iTrader: (1)
It will be heavy and underpowered. Nissan is going into the 8th year of this coupe and the only thing that has changed is now its called a Q. My car is payed in full but I am waiting for a turbo kit to be released. If it wasn't for that I would of traded it in and be rolling some American muscle
Just so you know I am not trying to be sarcastic here I am truly curious! LoL
#589
Registered Member
iTrader: (2)
I could care less about a turbo. The reason why I'm staying away from Audi and BMW is because of their turbos. BMW no longer makes any car w/o their turbos. Which we all know is a reliability nightmare.
If they made cars w/o turbos, I would have jumped on it a long time ago. Looking for a 4 seat 6mt coupe w/o turbo. Which is HARD to find.
My only option is the G37 Coupe, Genesis Coupe. Any one else have any more ideas? The Lexus RC Coupe would have been nice, but automatic only. The BRZ isn't luxury enough for me.
If they made cars w/o turbos, I would have jumped on it a long time ago. Looking for a 4 seat 6mt coupe w/o turbo. Which is HARD to find.
My only option is the G37 Coupe, Genesis Coupe. Any one else have any more ideas? The Lexus RC Coupe would have been nice, but automatic only. The BRZ isn't luxury enough for me.
#590
Moderator
I am curious...have you not looked at the pics or read any of the articles? Weight wise you may be right...who knows. But I'd hardly call 400 hp standard as under powered. They have changed WAY more than the badging to a Q which why I questioned if you had seen any of the articles regarding the next gen. And lastly, what are you driving now? I am pretty sure they already have TT kits for the current model G/Q.
Just so you know I am not trying to be sarcastic here I am truly curious! LoL
Just so you know I am not trying to be sarcastic here I am truly curious! LoL
The following users liked this post:
tag824 (06-22-2015)
#592
I could care less about a turbo. The reason why I'm staying away from Audi and BMW is because of their turbos. BMW no longer makes any car w/o their turbos. Which we all know is a reliability nightmare.
If they made cars w/o turbos, I would have jumped on it a long time ago. Looking for a 4 seat 6mt coupe w/o turbo. Which is HARD to find.
My only option is the G37 Coupe, Genesis Coupe. Any one else have any more ideas? The Lexus RC Coupe would have been nice, but automatic only. The BRZ isn't luxury enough for me.
If they made cars w/o turbos, I would have jumped on it a long time ago. Looking for a 4 seat 6mt coupe w/o turbo. Which is HARD to find.
My only option is the G37 Coupe, Genesis Coupe. Any one else have any more ideas? The Lexus RC Coupe would have been nice, but automatic only. The BRZ isn't luxury enough for me.
#593
Registered Member
iTrader: (2)
The turbos in BMW's are extremely reliable. In fact I think I've only seen one or two owners ever report turbo problems in the past 8yrs and I wouldn't be surprised if they were running a tune outside its "safe" parameters. There's never been a recall or issue with their turbos. Like it or not everyone is going this route for fuel economy. Soon your only non-turbo option will be used or a Lexus (who are still using 10yr old NA tech, lol).
Have you ever owned a Turbo car before? I have and they suck. They also stink and run rich to prevent detonation.
Even Ferrari doesn't like Turbos. Govt regulations trying to force turbos on everyone, they need to F off.
Why Ferrari engineers don't like turbos
#594
Premier Member
iTrader: (25)
I am curious...have you not looked at the pics or read any of the articles? Weight wise you may be right...who knows. But I'd hardly call 400 hp standard as under powered. They have changed WAY more than the badging to a Q which why I questioned if you had seen any of the articles regarding the next gen. And lastly, what are you driving now? I am pretty sure they already have TT kits for the current model G/Q.
Just so you know I am not trying to be sarcastic here I am truly curious! LoL
Just so you know I am not trying to be sarcastic here I am truly curious! LoL
#595
The turbos in BMW's are extremely reliable. In fact I think I've only seen one or two owners ever report turbo problems in the past 8yrs and I wouldn't be surprised if they were running a tune outside its "safe" parameters. There's never been a recall or issue with their turbos. Like it or not everyone is going this route for fuel economy. Soon your only non-turbo option will be used or a Lexus (who are still using 10yr old NA tech, lol).
Can you say turbo engines are unreliable in this day and age? I don't think so, they are just as reliable as NA engines, I drive turbo G to work everyday and have been for a few years now, no major issues.
#596
Recalls are only issued for safety concerns. Never for "reliability" issues. (G35 oil consumptions, Leaking valve covers, premature tire wear, compression rod bushings tearing apart for no reason, window motor failures, etc etc.).
Have you ever owned a Turbo car before? I have and they suck. They also stink and run rich to prevent detonation.
Even Ferrari doesn't like Turbos. Govt regulations trying to force turbos on everyone, they need to F off.
Why Ferrari engineers don't like turbos
Have you ever owned a Turbo car before? I have and they suck. They also stink and run rich to prevent detonation.
Even Ferrari doesn't like Turbos. Govt regulations trying to force turbos on everyone, they need to F off.
Why Ferrari engineers don't like turbos
#597
Turbos in BMW are the same turbos you would see in many other cars, they are actually made by mitsubishi. Like all other parts they do get some wear and tear and will need to be rebuilt, sometimes at 50k, sometimes at 150k. However, N54\55 engines suffer from reliability issues that are not turbo related, they have a notoriously terrible high pressure fuel pump that sometimes needs replacing 4 or 5 times, everyone with a turbo bmw is going to replace their hpfp at least once (if they are lucky). Their water pump is not much better, also needs replacing at ridiculously low miles.
Can you say turbo engines are unreliable in this day and age? I don't think so, they are just as reliable as NA engines, I drive turbo G to work everyday and have been for a few years now, no major issues.
Can you say turbo engines are unreliable in this day and age? I don't think so, they are just as reliable as NA engines, I drive turbo G to work everyday and have been for a few years now, no major issues.
#598
The whole hpfp is a thing of the past. They finally came out with a new one back in 2010 and have been solid since. BMW initially had extended the warranty to 100k miles but when they realized this wasn't a limited issue they did a recall on them. I haven't seen a hpfp issue in years.
#599
All cars from model year 2007-2010 had the recall issued. All cars after, 2011 and later came with the revised hpfp and and just recently would be coming off of warranty (BMW 4yr/50k miles).
#600
Registered Member
iTrader: (2)
Well, can't wait til Oct 2015. Hopefully it will come with a 6mt option. I need to start shopping mid to late October.
Maybe they will bring back rear active steer? AND not force DAS on us like they did with the Q50. (Back packaging that crap in the Touring Package).
Maybe they will bring back rear active steer? AND not force DAS on us like they did with the Q50. (Back packaging that crap in the Touring Package).