G37 Coupe
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By:

Q60 Final Teaser - Revealed in Detroit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-18-2016, 09:09 PM
  #3286  
jasonviper
Registered User
 
jasonviper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 261
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by sdwilly
Plus it's pretty well loaded with options for 58k. Far better trans than the Q60 as well.

Can't really see any features it's lacking over the Q60 other than the DAS of course
Maybe a base Q60, but there are many features, including safety and tech that the M2 doesn't offer. Sure you may not care about those features, but some people are looking for those features.
jasonviper is offline  
Old 09-18-2016, 09:15 PM
  #3287  
sdwilly
Registered User
 
sdwilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jasonviper
Maybe a base Q60, but there are many features, including safety and tech that the M2 doesn't offer. Sure you may not care about those features, but some people are looking for those features.
Which features?
sdwilly is offline  
Old 09-18-2016, 09:40 PM
  #3288  
jasonviper
Registered User
 
jasonviper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 261
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by sdwilly
Which features?
I'm mainly referring to safety and convenience features. Just compare the specs and you'll see. A couple I can think of is; the pre collision systems, autonomous braking, power tilt & telescopic steering wheel, remote start, heated seats, heated steering wheel, 360 degree parking cams, adjustable suspension ....the list goes on. Even something as simple as aluminum pedals, I know, now I'm being picky but c'mon BMW why not include some nice looking sport pedals in your M model.
jasonviper is offline  
Old 09-18-2016, 09:49 PM
  #3289  
sdwilly
Registered User
 
sdwilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It actually has the vast majority of that. There is one package (Executive) that includes the a few of them and the rest are stock (Only rear view camera and not surround).

Sure it doesn't have aluminum pedals, but what $100 add on and you have them. Also includes Apple Car Play for $300.
sdwilly is offline  
Old 09-18-2016, 09:59 PM
  #3290  
jasonviper
Registered User
 
jasonviper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 261
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by sdwilly
It actually has the vast majority of that. There is one package (Executive) that includes the a few of them and the rest are stock (Only rear view camera and not surround).

Sure it doesn't have aluminum pedals, but what $100 add on and you have them. Also includes Apple Car Play for $300.
Yeah I know the pedals are a cheap add on, but a fully loaded Q60 will sell for basically the same amount as the M2 because dealers aren't discounting the M2 much, in fact some are marking it up. The Q60 RS will probably be 3-4 tenths slower than the M2 and differences between drivers can eliminate that variance so IMO the RS is the better deal. I stress IMO.
jasonviper is offline  
Old 09-18-2016, 10:35 PM
  #3291  
sdwilly
Registered User
 
sdwilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I will give you that the M2 won't be going for a discount, BMW's rarely do, and sure it all comes down to personally preference. I'm fairly agnostic when it comes to cars, I float from one to another and whatever happens to strike my fancy at the moment I'm looking is what I'll get. I'll check out the RS when it comes out (I'm really hoping that it's a lot more impressive than the 3.0 I test drove a few weeks back, I really loved my IPL and there are way too many BMW's around here as is). If it doesn't do it for me I'll check out the M2, M4, 718 CS, C63 and maybe a few others, regardless what I pick I won't fault anyone from going with a RS (And who knows still a few months to go, I might get the RS).
sdwilly is offline  
Old 09-19-2016, 12:26 AM
  #3292  
ThebigJ
Registered Member
 
ThebigJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 243
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by P Casey
I don't think Infiniti has great perception when it comes to power. It's known for being an affordable car with a hint of luxury. Now it's semi irrelevant due to its lack of new gen models & being able to stand out. Throwing M parts together and being the little brother of a borderline 80k car that is super fast & kills the track is pretty nice. A lot of people consider it the old e92 M3 on roids.
Almost my thoughts.

What I might add would be it was supposed to be a cheaper and more reliable BMW imitation. It was very good at that at least on paper.

Now back to the RS vs M2. One should understand that it is not the straight line acceleration alone that makes M2 superior, in fact it is not really that fast since the new M240i, which is just a slightly pepped 2 series, WILL almost match that (or come very close). The driving pleasure between the two will be night and day.

Last edited by InfinitiFreak; 09-19-2016 at 07:48 AM.
ThebigJ is offline  
Old 09-19-2016, 01:11 AM
  #3293  
P Casey
Premier Member

iTrader: (13)
 
P Casey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 4,960
Received 34 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by jasonviper
Yeah I know the pedals are a cheap add on, but a fully loaded Q60 will sell for basically the same amount as the M2 because dealers aren't discounting the M2 much, in fact some are marking it up. The Q60 RS will probably be 3-4 tenths slower than the M2 and differences between drivers can eliminate that variance so IMO the RS is the better deal. I stress IMO.


A car that does 4.6 in 0-60 vs one that does it in 4 flat or lower means you are putting 3 plus cars on the trailer.


Lol the m2 is a sub 4 second car, or 4 on the dot.

The Infiniti RS will not be in that ball park.

Different drivers won't do much, maybe new turbos or e85 or spray will get you there but that's it.

That's ****img funny
P Casey is offline  
Old 09-19-2016, 01:43 AM
  #3294  
sdwilly
Registered User
 
sdwilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ThebigJ
Almost my thoughts.

What I might add would be it was supposed to be a cheaper and more reliable BMW imitation. It was very good at that at least on paper.

Now back to the RS vs M2. One should understand that it is not the straight line acceleration alone that makes M2 superior, in fact it is not really that fast since the new M240i, which is just a slightly pepped 2 series, WILL almost match that (or come very close). But once you drive both you will immediately realize the differences in handling.
At this price point they should have gone DCT.

Last edited by InfinitiFreak; 09-19-2016 at 07:49 AM.
sdwilly is offline  
Old 09-19-2016, 02:50 AM
  #3295  
ThebigJ
Registered Member
 
ThebigJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 243
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by sdwilly
At this price point they should have gone DCT.
Funny thing is QX30 has the Merc 7speed DCT. They could obviously have brought it to the RS.

Last edited by InfinitiFreak; 09-19-2016 at 07:50 AM.
ThebigJ is offline  
Old 09-19-2016, 06:06 AM
  #3296  
jasonviper
Registered User
 
jasonviper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 261
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by P Casey
A car that does 4.6 in 0-60 vs one that does it in 4 flat or lower means you are putting 3 plus cars on the trailer.


Lol the m2 is a sub 4 second car, or 4 on the dot.

The Infiniti RS will not be in that ball park.

Different drivers won't do much, maybe new turbos or e85 or spray will get you there but that's it.

That's ****img funny
These cars make enough power that you just can't mash the gas pedal and expect optimal acceleration times. The driver who doesn't know their vehicles sweet spot in regards to acceleration from a standstill with these cars will lose. Ok, BMW says 4.1 to 60 and I guess your using Infiniti's listed time but we already know the engine is capable of faster times. I've embarrassed plenty of cars that should be faster than my Hybrid Sport simply because they couldn't put the power down correctly. It wouldn't surprise me to see a AWD Red Sport hit 0-60 in 4.3 - 4.4

Last edited by jasonviper; 09-19-2016 at 07:14 AM.
jasonviper is offline  
Old 09-19-2016, 10:38 AM
  #3297  
eljoker
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
eljoker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,221
Received 192 Likes on 125 Posts
Originally Posted by ThebigJ
Funny thing is QX30 has the Merc 7speed DCT. They could obviously have brought it to the RS.
That DCT is tiny and fits only on the FWD models. Would of never worked.
eljoker is offline  
Old 09-19-2016, 03:33 PM
  #3298  
ThebigJ
Registered Member
 
ThebigJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 243
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by eljoker
That DCT is tiny and fits only on the FWD models. Would of never worked.
For 400hp they could have gotten the 7 speed AMG dct speedshift which is used in their rwd's too.
ThebigJ is offline  
Old 09-19-2016, 04:04 PM
  #3299  
User 122320
Registered Member
iTrader: (2)
 
User 122320's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 907
Received 74 Likes on 56 Posts
Coulda Woulda Shouda.

Infinti. don't give a flippa.
User 122320 is offline  
Old 09-19-2016, 10:44 PM
  #3300  
eljoker
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
eljoker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,221
Received 192 Likes on 125 Posts
Idk who asked about the wood option but we have a coupe with it. Here is what I could do real quick when we were moving the lot around today.
Attached Thumbnails Q60 Final Teaser - Revealed in Detroit-20160919_105905.jpg   Q60 Final Teaser - Revealed in Detroit-20160919_105910.jpg   Q60 Final Teaser - Revealed in Detroit-20160919_105912.jpg  
eljoker is offline  


Quick Reply: Q60 Final Teaser - Revealed in Detroit



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:36 AM.