Q60 Final Teaser - Revealed in Detroit
#2627
Registered Member
iTrader: (1)
1967 Hemi GTX here. God I loved that car. The 69 Chevelle was in my opinion, one of best looking late 60's cars. By the way, anyone interested in late 60's / early 70's muscle cars, check the ET's of these bad a$$ babies. 13's and 14's was not unusual. :-)
If I remember we called non posi rears "one legged". 400HP, 350 Torque, one legged? Has to hurt 60' and 1/4 not to mention coming out of a tight apex?
If I remember we called non posi rears "one legged". 400HP, 350 Torque, one legged? Has to hurt 60' and 1/4 not to mention coming out of a tight apex?
The following users liked this post:
gill1606 (08-14-2016)
#2628
I might have been given misinformation but the Service Manager that I know quite well said the flat emblem doesn't illuminate on the tech package but the raised one will. He also said that the demo car was only roughly 90 % production. I'm not sure what's the remaining 10% left to complete production though.
#2629
1967 Hemi GTX here. God I loved that car. The 69 Chevelle was in my opinion, one of best looking late 60's cars. By the way, anyone interested in late 60's / early 70's muscle cars, check the ET's of these bad a$$ babies. 13's and 14's was not unusual. :-)
If I remember we called non posi rears "one legged". 400HP, 350 Torque, one legged? Has to hurt 60' and 1/4 not to mention coming out of a tight apex?
If I remember we called non posi rears "one legged". 400HP, 350 Torque, one legged? Has to hurt 60' and 1/4 not to mention coming out of a tight apex?
BMW does this in the 3 as you have to get the M to get a true LSD.
But I still think they should have it on the RS400. That's a lot of torque/ HP for the brakes to stop- not to mention the wear on the rear pads
The following 2 users liked this post by KAHBOOM:
Boomer-Bob (08-13-2016),
gill1606 (08-13-2016)
#2630
Registered User
Thread Starter
Infinitis are notorious for needing rear pads. Almost every G/Q we get traded in with around 30k miles get a rear brake service. Fronts isally go 60k or more. Maybe it is Active Trace!
#2631
Registered Member
The DAS system also has a mode where the delay associated with mechanical steering is incorporated into the DAS digital system, for those who are not used to the immediate response of the DAS. So if you get DAS, just put it on mechanical mode to incorporate the feeling of driving a mechanical hydraulic steering system.
Plus DAS is optional anyway, its not standard to any model, the standard is a hydraulic and electronic power steering.
Last edited by gill1606; 08-13-2016 at 02:28 PM.
#2632
Registered Member
iTrader: (2)
some people actually liked the Direct adaptive steering (DAS). I have heard a couple reviewers who acutally liked it, saying it is very precise and crisp steering over the traditional mechanical one. They said you have to get used to it at first since there is a delay in traditional mechanical steering that is nonexistent in the DAS system, where the steering is immediate and much more precise to your input on the steering wheel.
The DAS system also has a mode where the delay associated with mechanical steering is incorporated into the DAS digital system, for those who are not used to the immediate response of the DAS. So if you get DAS, just put it on mechanical mode to incorporate the feeling of driving a mechanical hydraulic steering system.
Plus DAS is optional anyway, its not standard to any model, the standard is a hydraulic and electronic power steering.
The DAS system also has a mode where the delay associated with mechanical steering is incorporated into the DAS digital system, for those who are not used to the immediate response of the DAS. So if you get DAS, just put it on mechanical mode to incorporate the feeling of driving a mechanical hydraulic steering system.
Plus DAS is optional anyway, its not standard to any model, the standard is a hydraulic and electronic power steering.
I would like to see a cone test of DAS vs Traditional steering. Or some type of test that shows one is better over the other like Nissan did was RAS.
DAS was thrown in the Deluxe Touring package previously. It is now separate. So we were forced to buy DAS if we wanted 360 view camera.
When I had my Q50, I maybe changed the setting once to test it the different modes. So out of the 2 years lease, I used sports mode steering maybe once. lol It felt heavy and really no use for everyday driving.
Never liked it. And yes, when I first test drove the car in "standard mode" the steering felt wonky as hell. I did get use to it during the test drive.
#2633
Registered Member
Highly doubtful. Which is why the 2nd generation received a major re-engineering.
I would like to see a cone test of DAS vs Traditional steering. Or some type of test that shows one is better over the other like Nissan did was RAS.
DAS was thrown in the Deluxe Touring package previously. It is now separate. So we were forced to buy DAS if we wanted 360 view camera.
When I had my Q50, I maybe changed the setting once to test it the different modes. So out of the 2 years lease, I used sports mode steering maybe once. lol It felt heavy and really no use for everyday driving.
Never liked it. And yes, when I first test drove the car in "standard mode" the steering felt wonky as hell. I did get use to it during the test drive.
I would like to see a cone test of DAS vs Traditional steering. Or some type of test that shows one is better over the other like Nissan did was RAS.
DAS was thrown in the Deluxe Touring package previously. It is now separate. So we were forced to buy DAS if we wanted 360 view camera.
When I had my Q50, I maybe changed the setting once to test it the different modes. So out of the 2 years lease, I used sports mode steering maybe once. lol It felt heavy and really no use for everyday driving.
Never liked it. And yes, when I first test drove the car in "standard mode" the steering felt wonky as hell. I did get use to it during the test drive.
#2634
Registered User
Highly doubtful. Which is why the 2nd generation received a major re-engineering.
I would like to see a cone test of DAS vs Traditional steering. Or some type of test that shows one is better over the other like Nissan did was RAS.
DAS was thrown in the Deluxe Touring package previously. It is now separate. So we were forced to buy DAS if we wanted 360 view camera.
When I had my Q50, I maybe changed the setting once to test it the different modes. So out of the 2 years lease, I used sports mode steering maybe once. lol It felt heavy and really no use for everyday driving.
Never liked it. And yes, when I first test drove the car in "standard mode" the steering felt wonky as hell. I did get use to it during the test drive.
I would like to see a cone test of DAS vs Traditional steering. Or some type of test that shows one is better over the other like Nissan did was RAS.
DAS was thrown in the Deluxe Touring package previously. It is now separate. So we were forced to buy DAS if we wanted 360 view camera.
When I had my Q50, I maybe changed the setting once to test it the different modes. So out of the 2 years lease, I used sports mode steering maybe once. lol It felt heavy and really no use for everyday driving.
Never liked it. And yes, when I first test drove the car in "standard mode" the steering felt wonky as hell. I did get use to it during the test drive.
#2636
Registered User
#2637
I've finally decided after seeing the car enough, I dislike it. I'm glad they went with a new engine but the exterior is a no go, and something I wouldn't buy. I usually see potential in most cars out there but the rear end of the car is the only thing that is good. The front & side are pretty bad.
The following users liked this post:
Glenn2008 (08-15-2016)
#2638
I've finally decided after seeing the car enough, I dislike it. I'm glad they went with a new engine but the exterior is a no go, and something I wouldn't buy. I usually see potential in most cars out there but the rear end of the car is the only thing that is good. The front & side are pretty bad.
#2639
Registered User
Thread Starter
So this just happened
#2640
Moderator
![](/images/staff.gif)