LegitMW

iTrader: (6)

F:19x9 +27 (245/40)
R:19x10 +33 (275/35)

I was wondering if these will sit flush at the fender on the coupe. I'm lowered on Eibachs.

Wyldfyer

That may sit pretty good actually. I had 20x10 +38 on my old G35 and it just missed being flush so 33 may be perfect. 25 stuck out just a bit. Front looks good as well.

LegitMW

iTrader: (6)

Thanks man (:

Any more inputs ?

eksigned

iTrader: (1)

That's perfectly flush for a sedan. I'd imagine for the coupes in general, something in the high +20's would hit perfectly flush in the rears. There're some EXPERT "flush offset" members on here...you'll just have to wait for them to respond lol

Sorry I wasn't much help. I think you can go a bit more though.

gtslo88

Ttt have similar question

frty9rsfn

you will sit flush... im at 10 in. in width on a + 35 in the rears and im flush on 285/35.


im sitting on on a 9.5 + 22 upfront on a 245/40 so you can get an idea...


side shot... but then again, i wanted fat tires too... handles like a dream... no rubbing and in camber specs...

DPE G

iTrader: (19)

Tires could be wider in both the front and rear w/those offsets. Probably a 285/295 in the rear would give it more of a flush look, 255 in the front. Rears will be conservative but not by much, fronts could be much more agressive. I'm running 245/30s on a 9.5+25 now, and a 9+25 in the pics below. You will be 8mm less agressive in the front than my current setup and i have 0 rubbing or mods up front, w/just a shaved rear bracket on the rear bumper.

This is a 10.5 +32 w/285s







here is a 9.5+25 (8mm more poke than your 9 +27)



Not sure about the eibach drop, as Ive never seen it personally, but this will give you an idea. Also "flush" depends on what you mean, those will def not be poking offsets, but more agressive than a standard fit wheel for sure.