Twin Turbo G37 on 22s??!!!
#22
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
People purchase a G for a reason. If that reason is to be fast, then I think, frankly, they have failed. There are other cars out there that are faster than the G for less money. If faster equaled better, then you could say that a Dodge Neon SRT-4 is a better car than a Z or a G. The VQ is fun all motor. It doesn't have to be boosted for someone to enjoy it. One could make the argument that it is actually more fun N/A. Secondly, I can pick out ten cars on this forum that have "more mods" than the G in that video, but that doesn't make them nicer cars. Often times less is more when it comes to modifying.
The work and money invested in the twin turbo set-up is certainly admirable, but that doesn't take away from the fact that he has wheels that are only inhibiting the performance of that car (aside from the fact that they are ugly - but, yes, looks are subjective). If his goal was strictly performance, or speed, then he would not have 22" wheels on it. On top of that, I'd be willing to bet the owner of that car has upwards of $20,000 invested in that engine. How much do you think he spent on those wheels and the rubber?
People are entitled to an opinion whether their car is "better" or not. We all make comments (or hold back comments) on this forum on what we like or dislike. I don't necessary like the wheels on that G, but I'm not supposed to express that because that car can beat my N/A G in a straight line?
The work and money invested in the twin turbo set-up is certainly admirable, but that doesn't take away from the fact that he has wheels that are only inhibiting the performance of that car (aside from the fact that they are ugly - but, yes, looks are subjective). If his goal was strictly performance, or speed, then he would not have 22" wheels on it. On top of that, I'd be willing to bet the owner of that car has upwards of $20,000 invested in that engine. How much do you think he spent on those wheels and the rubber?
People are entitled to an opinion whether their car is "better" or not. We all make comments (or hold back comments) on this forum on what we like or dislike. I don't necessary like the wheels on that G, but I'm not supposed to express that because that car can beat my N/A G in a straight line?
#23
SoCal Driven
iTrader: (50)
People purchase a G for a reason. If that reason is to be fast, then I think, frankly, they have failed. There are other cars out there that are faster than the G for less money. If faster equaled better, then you could say that a Dodge Neon SRT-4 is a better car than a Z or a G. The VQ is fun all motor. It doesn't have to be boosted for someone to enjoy it. One could make the argument that it is actually more fun N/A. Secondly, I can pick out ten cars on this forum that have "more mods" than the G in that video, but that doesn't make them nicer cars. Often times less is more when it comes to modifying.
The work and money invested in the twin turbo set-up is certainly admirable, but that doesn't take away from the fact that he has wheels that are only inhibiting the performance of that car (aside from the fact that they are ugly - but, yes, looks are subjective). If his goal was strictly performance, or speed, then he would not have 22" wheels on it. On top of that, I'd be willing to bet the owner of that car has upwards of $20,000 invested in that engine. How much do you think he spent on those wheels and the rubber?
People are entitled to an opinion whether their car is "better" or not. We all make comments (or hold back comments) on this forum on what we like or dislike. I don't necessary like the wheels on that G, but I'm not supposed to express that because that car can beat my N/A G in a straight line?
The work and money invested in the twin turbo set-up is certainly admirable, but that doesn't take away from the fact that he has wheels that are only inhibiting the performance of that car (aside from the fact that they are ugly - but, yes, looks are subjective). If his goal was strictly performance, or speed, then he would not have 22" wheels on it. On top of that, I'd be willing to bet the owner of that car has upwards of $20,000 invested in that engine. How much do you think he spent on those wheels and the rubber?
People are entitled to an opinion whether their car is "better" or not. We all make comments (or hold back comments) on this forum on what we like or dislike. I don't necessary like the wheels on that G, but I'm not supposed to express that because that car can beat my N/A G in a straight line?
Well said bro!
#26
I like the engine bay, looks clean(i always thought if people go TT the engine bay looks far from stock). I've had people tell me that the G37 should at least get 21s, since the stock comes 19s... now i can see how it looks on 22s. Looks huge! LOL
#29
SoCal Driven
iTrader: (50)
tell this guy that
<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/tXmOg4QuVCE?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tXmOg4QuVCE?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>