G37 Coupe

Get an '09 or wait for '10 turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-24-2008 | 10:16 PM
  #16  
kg37's Avatar
kg37
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: New York
Originally Posted by RedG37SNC
Remember this is Infiniti, they'll need to under cut BMW by at least 5K, putting the car in the 50K range. A TT V6 with 7sp dual clutch, more horsepower and better gas mileage, that's pretty much what it would take.. otherwise it wouldn't sell.

You are right. It has to be cheaper than BMW at all times.
Old 08-24-2008 | 10:16 PM
  #17  
RedG37SNC's Avatar
RedG37SNC
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 4
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by GiGGaplease
i would just get the '09 model. if you wait for the '10 model, there would be something better in '11 or '12 when the car gets a make over. i doubt the '10 would get the tt, nissan doesnt want to take away buyers for the gtr.
Will the G37 take away buyers of the 370Z , likewise would a TTLuxCoupe take away buyers of a GT-R. LuxCoupes vs Sports cars...two different buyers. Just playing devils advocate.. I still see it coming.
Old 08-24-2008 | 10:29 PM
  #18  
RedG37SNC's Avatar
RedG37SNC
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 4
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by GiGGaplease
i would just get the '09 model. if you wait for the '10 model, there would be something better in '11 or '12 when the car gets a make over. i doubt the '10 would get the tt, nissan doesnt want to take away buyers for the gtr.
Typical advice, however there is such a thing as the "sweet spot." Bying a car a year before it goes from 5AT to 7AT = FAIL. Bying it and having the only updates for two years being a rotory heat setting and new door handles = PASS..lol, you get my point. If I bougt a 09 now and in 10 they released a TT with dual clutch, sportier looks, same lux interior for 5-6K more=FAIL!!! Just like War, the only way to win this game is not to play.. or have a relative in Nissan engineering

Last edited by RedG37SNC; 08-24-2008 at 10:38 PM.
Old 08-24-2008 | 10:36 PM
  #19  
JLai's Avatar
JLai
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,381
Likes: 2
From: Ponte Vedra, FL
Wait for the 2050 model...I hear it can hover.
Old 08-24-2008 | 11:57 PM
  #20  
Achilles's Avatar
Achilles
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
If you're ready, go for an '09. Rumors blow!!!!
Old 08-25-2008 | 12:02 AM
  #21  
TerribleONE453's Avatar
TerribleONE453
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,404
Likes: 5
From: Chatsworth CA
Originally Posted by JLai
Wait for the 2050 model...I hear it can hover.
and its quaddrillion turbo charged
Old 08-25-2008 | 12:29 AM
  #22  
trebien's Avatar
trebien
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: ATX
It's a lot more expensive to twin turbo a car, than just put a bigger engine in it. Plus, all that added weight for piping, intercoolers, turbos and such add weight to the front end.

Based on Infiniti's investments in N/A engines, like the 3.7 and the new 5.0L... I would say it's more probable to see a larger N/A engine before a TT setup in the G class.

And even beyond that, Infiniti has a really good niche cut out for the G37. It would seem more likely to see an expensive TT powerplant in an M-class luxury coupe before the G class... a la the new S5, BMW 6 series, MB CLK, etc.

The turbos are kind of a non-issue, now. Usually, they offer performance and fuel efficiency benefits. But Infiniti has the new 3.7L engine with very similar power and fuel efficiency compared to the turbo BMW 3 liter... at much less cost to produce and maintain, so N/A ftw. For instance, Lexus went with their corporate 5L engine for the IS-F.

While it may seem absurd at first, the way I see it, if MB can stuff a 6.2L into the C63, then Infiniti can stuff a 5L into a G50 and not look ridiculous at all.

My only concern would be the added weight up front...

edit: btw, if there were to be a turbo engine forthcoming, I wouldn't be surprised if it was a 2.5L, with performance and fuel efficiency in mind, like Audi's 2.0 liter base engine, say with ~ 260 HP and T. That'd be a really nice base engine, while still supporting Infiniti's "performance" lean.

Last edited by trebien; 08-25-2008 at 12:34 AM.
Old 08-25-2008 | 02:42 AM
  #23  
ucla bruin's Avatar
ucla bruin
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,776
Likes: 3
From: Orange County
Originally Posted by JLai
Wait for the 2050 model...I hear it can hover.


__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Old 08-25-2008 | 06:44 AM
  #24  
myk1013's Avatar
myk1013
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,190
Likes: 19
From: Northside, Isle of Guam
The world's gonna end in 2012. So get the '09 an enjoy that extra year having it.

BTW someone told me that on this forum before deciding on the '08 or '09. I pulled the trigger late April and I still carry that smile when I get in the car to this day.
Old 08-25-2008 | 08:28 AM
  #25  
fcarpio's Avatar
fcarpio
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 368
Likes: 9
From: South Florida
There is already an M3 competitor and it blows it away, it is called the Nissan GTR. I do not see the point in Nissan putting out ANOTHER M3 competitor. It makes more sense to make a GTR with a more luxurios trim.
Old 08-25-2008 | 01:19 PM
  #26  
msb3079's Avatar
msb3079
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: Collingswood, NJ
Originally Posted by trebien

While it may seem absurd at first, the way I see it, if MB can stuff a 6.2L into the C63, then Infiniti can stuff a 5L into a G50 and not look ridiculous at all.

My only concern would be the added weight up front...
maybe that's why the G coupe comes stock with more wheel gap in the front...
Old 08-26-2008 | 09:49 PM
  #27  
nyczmadman's Avatar
nyczmadman
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Nyc
thats prob a rumor but there is a rumor that there will be a four door GTR for infiniti
read it on leftlanenews.com (i think)
Old 08-26-2008 | 10:06 PM
  #28  
RedG37SNC's Avatar
RedG37SNC
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 4
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by fcarpio
There is already an M3 competitor and it blows it away, it is called the Nissan GTR. I do not see the point in Nissan putting out ANOTHER M3 competitor. It makes more sense to make a GTR with a more luxurios trim.
The car's aren't even in the same class...or price range for that matter. The GTR is not a M3 competitor, a Audi R8 competitor defiantely.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kojack
Private Classifieds
9
10-09-2015 05:53 PM
Tuckermaclain
G37 Sedan
59
10-05-2015 11:41 PM
Jonesmeister11
South
0
09-30-2015 09:07 AM
Landshark
Body Interior Exterior Lighting
3
09-29-2015 11:20 PM
MrRiv
Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
0
09-29-2015 04:59 PM



Quick Reply: Get an '09 or wait for '10 turbo?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:36 PM.