Who likes the 4WAS???
#31
4 PROBLEMS:
1) MONEY $1300!
2) USE, AVERAGE PERSON WONT BENEFIT
3) REPAIRS AFTER 60k, I bet it would be a expensive technology to FIX or REPAIR, And Like Kenny (Da Mayor) Said You need Wheel Alignments and who knows what else after a while
4) Higher WEIGHT Takes away Performance
1) MONEY $1300!
2) USE, AVERAGE PERSON WONT BENEFIT
3) REPAIRS AFTER 60k, I bet it would be a expensive technology to FIX or REPAIR, And Like Kenny (Da Mayor) Said You need Wheel Alignments and who knows what else after a while
4) Higher WEIGHT Takes away Performance
1. You're buying a $40,000 car. It's not exactly cheap to begin with.
2. Completely opposite. The average person is the only kind that WOULD benefit. Why do you think M45s have rear active steering too? It's a luxurious option. It really makes things easier through everyday driving. Trust me, I had a 350z before this car and I DID drive them back to back.
3. I have 30k on my G35c with 4ws, I commute on I95 and through the city (potholes) and have NO problems
4. This is a luxury sports coupe. Not meant to blaze 1/4mile tracks or road courses. How many people do you know with a dedicated G37 race car? Exactly, me neither (and i dont mean ****** who use their street car for a handful of trackdays a year).
Last edited by EightOneZero; 12-02-2007 at 10:55 PM.
#32
I agree 100%. I test drove a G37 without 4WAS, then one WITH 4WAS then one without 4WAS and could notice a huge difference. Lane changes were much quicker, on ramps and off ramps could be taken at much higher speeds, and quick movements through traffic were much smoother. I ordered it on my car and can't wait to get it. Sharp turns into parking spots seemed a bit easier with 4WAS than without it (this could just be my interpretation).
I agree with what you described as well. Seems like the only people putting down 4WAS are the ones who ordered their G37s without it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post