G37 Coupe

g37s 6MT disappointing "off the line.'

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2007 | 11:30 AM
  #46  
RedHerring's Avatar
RedHerring
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 362
Likes: 2
From: Chattanooga, TN
G37? Lack Torque. ha ha. Hahahaha. Bwahahahahahaha. You funny man. Lets just say you cannot fail to feel the difference.
Old 10-17-2007 | 12:29 PM
  #47  
DetroitG37Joe's Avatar
DetroitG37Joe
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 1
From: Metro Detroit, MI [Sterling Hts.]
Speaking of peak power - I Heard somewhere, especially with high end cars, that power peaks around 20,000 miles. Sounds a bit hefty and im sure that if one were to map it out as an algorhythm that the fluctuation between 18k and 20k is slight but the fluctuation from 350mi to 10k to 25K may be substantial. I think all our G's are still young to really speak for its smoothness in clutch, or peak power just yet. The break in must be pretty important from what I gather.

Last edited by DetroitG37Joe; 10-17-2007 at 12:34 PM.
Old 10-17-2007 | 12:33 PM
  #48  
DetroitG37Joe's Avatar
DetroitG37Joe
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 1
From: Metro Detroit, MI [Sterling Hts.]
2nd gear starts...?

as far as idle starts right into 1st gear - i can say this. the G has enough torque to give me SMOOTH starts from idle to 2nd gear - my cousin in chicago who had a stock s2k (turbo now) but when it was stock he used to complain about how starting off in second gear didnt feel right - not with the 100-some torque he had on the s2k...just wasnt right. When im lazy i just start in second gear and its smooth as hell feels like the revs are mathcing jsut right - friction point feels wider - u can give gas more liberally - etc.

BTW this is my first manual tranny car so i am still tweaking my skills on it. are 2nd gear starts bad? I asked my cousin with the turbo s2k and he said upshifting and skipping gears when ur lazy (like 2nd to 4th) is bad and gives uneven wear and tear on the gears and that the revs can't be matched perfectly. however people recommend the idle to 2nd gear starts in the snow but can that have any detrimental effects? I figure since we have some torque on our cars it may be permissible.

Any thoughts?
Old 10-17-2007 | 02:25 PM
  #49  
PepsiGuru's Avatar
PepsiGuru
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Code:
get in car, close doors
turn to ON (foot off brake)
wait three seconds
fully press and release gas pedal 5 times within 5 seconds (don't do this too hastily though)
wait 7 seconds
fully depress gas and hold for 10 seconds (at the end of this, your SEL light should start blinking, if not START OVER)
release gas
wait 10 seconds
fully depress gas and hold for 11 seconds (just to be sure)
release gas
start car
drive

i usually do this procedure two or three times in a row to make sure i'm satisfied that i've reset the ECU. only because there's no idiot light that says, "hey, you've reset the ECU".

OK I want to do this, seeing as I have over 3000 miles on mine.

Question: When you say 'Turn To ON", do you mean turn the car ON ? Or just sit in the car ? . . Help . . . I don't feel like losing all my presets on the radio

Thanx
Old 10-17-2007 | 02:28 PM
  #50  
spyderbret's Avatar
spyderbret
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 362
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas NV
ON but not with the engine running. Just push the start button till it says "ON" but dont put your foot on the brake....
Old 10-17-2007 | 02:30 PM
  #51  
ivory37's Avatar
ivory37
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: NY
Originally Posted by boazila
Actually, I have no regrets. I love the car. HOWEVER, I am worried that maybe there is something wrong with mine. Which is why I posted the question in the first place.

How 'bout you get your car first, drive it a little, and then maybe your replies will have actual added value.
I dont think anyone is really getting on you. But who drives at under 2k RPMS for more than a half second anyway.
Old 10-17-2007 | 03:04 PM
  #52  
JsnMR2's Avatar
JsnMR2
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by boazila
I am a bit disappointed with my g37s acceleration "off the line." The dealer keeps on telling me that after the break-in, it will change. Sounds like dealer talk to me. Any input on this? I must say, 2000RPM and up it is a jet, but the initial acceleration leaves something to be desired.

I am currently at 300 miles.

BTW, love the car otherwise.
Ummm... So you are saying it's slow BELOW 2K RPM? O.o Hopefully if you are drag racing you are never that low in the power band. Even on normal starts you are barely ever below 2,000 RPM.
Old 10-17-2007 | 04:04 PM
  #53  
boazila's Avatar
boazila
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
That's true - more like 4k rpm. But the point is still - too weak to get off the line. Awesome from 40-90mph.
Old 10-17-2007 | 04:15 PM
  #54  
Orlando333's Avatar
Orlando333
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by dmkozak
1. If you were so concerned about drag strip performance, why didn't you buy a drag strip car?

2. If you are so concerned about drag strip performance, why don't you build a drag strip car?

3. If you have a job, does the G37 get you there quickly, safely, in comfort and in style?

4. If you are in school, wait until you graduate, get a job and get married, then you'll have plenty of other things to complain about.
People buy cars for different reasons. Your comments suggest that the original poster should not expect more from the car and simply settle.

The car has been represented to be an improvement to its predecessor in many ways, including horse power and straight line performance.

I bought a G37 for my high school aged son, knowing it is pretty weak under the hood. He nonetheless thought he would have a fast beast and complains of the performance. Mind you, he is still in his break in period. (I have owned an APS Twin Turbo G35 and know first hand that a G can be a monster on the strip and on the track.)

A G37 would not be my first choice of a car for the same reasons. (For the record, I own a Cayman S, which is my daily driver, and a 996 GT2, as my weekend car. My son understands the difference in cars when he hops out of the GT2 into his g35.)

At the end, different strokes for different folks.
Old 10-17-2007 | 04:18 PM
  #55  
Callaway's Avatar
Callaway
Arm flailing tube man
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,043
Likes: 2
From: Northern Virginia
^^Can you adopt me? I don't take up much room.
Old 10-17-2007 | 04:39 PM
  #56  
Gyoza's Avatar
Gyoza
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 729
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta
Originally Posted by Orlando333
People buy cars for different reasons. Your comments suggest that the original poster should not expect more from the car and simply settle.

The car has been represented to be an improvement to its predecessor in many ways, including horse power and straight line performance.

I bought a G37 for my high school aged son, knowing it is pretty weak under the hood. He nonetheless thought he would have a fast beast and complains of the performance. Mind you, he is still in his break in period. (I have owned an APS Twin Turbo G35 and know first hand that a G can be a monster on the strip and on the track.)

A G37 would not be my first choice of a car for the same reasons. (For the record, I own a Cayman S, which is my daily driver, and a 996 GT2, as my weekend car. My son understands the difference in cars when he hops out of the GT2 into his g35.)

At the end, different strokes for different folks.

Well I bought my 15 year old (learners permit) a Saleen S7, and he thought that was fast until he rode in my Bugatti Veyron....

By saying the G37 is "weak" under the hood doesn't make sense. The G35/37 is not a weak car by any means. If you (or your son) thinks that a car that does 0-60 in the mid 5s is slow, then please let me know what it is that you are smoking. Yes there are faster cars, but 5.5 isnt slow, sorry.

And if you are looking to adopt, I will gladly accept a $40k+ car with no complaints.
Old 10-17-2007 | 04:41 PM
  #57  
cvt's Avatar
cvt
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 8
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Callaway
^^Can you adopt me? I don't take up much room.
+1...i don't eat much either. you are the best dad in the world.
Old 10-17-2007 | 04:41 PM
  #58  
JsnMR2's Avatar
JsnMR2
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Well there are not many cars out there that are fast below 2k rpm, or for that matter, even 4k rpm. Obviously if that is what you want, there are some V8 sports cars out there, or some $90k+ benz. The G37 obviously is not the fastest thing made, but is a well rounded car for 40 grand.
Old 10-17-2007 | 04:42 PM
  #59  
gurneyeagle's Avatar
gurneyeagle
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 394
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Originally Posted by Callaway
^^Can you adopt me? I don't take up much room.


Interesting first post though.
Old 10-17-2007 | 04:57 PM
  #60  
CHI-TOWN G37's Avatar
CHI-TOWN G37
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,507
Likes: 0
I sold my GT3 to buy the G37, 'cause I needed a slower car as I got too many tickets.


Quick Reply: g37s 6MT disappointing "off the line.'



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:34 AM.