Why not make an 08 G35c 306HP VQ also?
#16
Originally Posted by izmir41500
doesn't make financial sense.
i bet next year, the G35sedan will be gone, replace by G37 sedan, and the
price will go up a little to offset the cost of the 3.7L engine, but overall, they
will make more money because of scale of econmoy, and give their customer
a more power, yet more fuel efficient engine
#17
because they need to stay away from the ricers... live up to its name and stick to its business plan... having a bunch of leased G37 coming back with ricer kits, clear lights, and stickers all over the place and a broken camber kit which was intalled upside down will put Infiniti into the shlt... who would want to buy a used car with all that crap? hahaha.
#18
Originally Posted by wyatthanson
Old G35: $35K
New G35c: Maybe $37K.
New G35c: Maybe $37K.
#22
Originally Posted by steviep_g35
Infiniti just needs to get on with it and introduce the G45. I think that would make everyone happy... no?
#1 The VQ45 is being replaced with VQ50 with close to 400hp output.
#2 The VQ will destroy the weight distribution and handling balance on the G
#3 Why ask for a gas guzzling V8 when we should be eyeing the VQ37TT from the GT-R. Sure, detune the engine to make room for the GT-R, but we'd still like to see a factory TT option. The M3 and IS-F will be in for quite a spanking if Infiniti offers TT option on the G.
#23
Originally Posted by skaterbasist
And what makes you think their won't be a 3.5 liter as an option?
I can bet my coupe that their will be a 3.5 and 3.7 (obviously) in 08.
The G37 is their to compete with the 335i.
Im sure Infiniti hasnt forgotten about the rest [below the 335i] .
.
I can bet my coupe that their will be a 3.5 and 3.7 (obviously) in 08.
The G37 is their to compete with the 335i.
Im sure Infiniti hasnt forgotten about the rest [below the 335i] .
.
i dont expect nissan/inifniti to do that.. they've bumped up motors and not offered the smaller motor in previous years... ie prev gen maxima,pathfinder,i30(i35)... its how they cut costs... mass production
#25
Originally Posted by Sukairain
No, not really.
#1 The VQ45 is being replaced with VQ50 with close to 400hp output.
#2 The VQ will destroy the weight distribution and handling balance on the G
#3 Why ask for a gas guzzling V8 when we should be eyeing the VQ37TT from the GT-R. Sure, detune the engine to make room for the GT-R, but we'd still like to see a factory TT option. The M3 and IS-F will be in for quite a spanking if Infiniti offers TT option on the G.
#1 The VQ45 is being replaced with VQ50 with close to 400hp output.
#2 The VQ will destroy the weight distribution and handling balance on the G
#3 Why ask for a gas guzzling V8 when we should be eyeing the VQ37TT from the GT-R. Sure, detune the engine to make room for the GT-R, but we'd still like to see a factory TT option. The M3 and IS-F will be in for quite a spanking if Infiniti offers TT option on the G.
Why would infiniti offer a tt option when they are coming out with the skyline? And ps- Im not so sure it'll be faster than the m3 or IS-F, and neither are you since there hasnt been a test on any of the three vehicles.
Also my v8 gs400 got identical gass mileage as the gs300 I6 models did, so it doesnt automatically mean that either.
#26
Originally Posted by skaterbasist
It's called marketing
Why would they only have a "G37" in a market so competivive?
Just incase some of you have not noticed, the 335i isnt the only vehicle in the 3-series.
Im sure Infiniti has not forgotten about the 328i and 328xi.
.
Why would they only have a "G37" in a market so competivive?
Just incase some of you have not noticed, the 335i isnt the only vehicle in the 3-series.
Im sure Infiniti has not forgotten about the 328i and 328xi.
.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SuicidalG37SGuy
Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
8
09-10-2015 06:01 AM
mmnjtwa
Brakes, Suspension, Wheels & Tires
4
09-07-2015 02:27 PM