what will 0-60 be? in 08 g37
05-29-2007, 04:19 PM
#226
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: AL.
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
07-07-2007, 06:17 PM
#227
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car and Driver just tested it at 5.3 seconds 0-60. Too bad because they tested the 07 G35sedan at 5.3 seconds!
That's a screw up! Infiniti should have bumped up the car to do 4.9 seconds and put the 335i and others to shame.
That's a screw up! Infiniti should have bumped up the car to do 4.9 seconds and put the 335i and others to shame.
07-07-2007, 06:20 PM
#228
Yin-Yang and Life
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Apple Valley, CA
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by tat
Car and Driver just tested it at 5.3 seconds 0-60. Too bad because they tested the 07 G35sedan at 5.3 seconds!
That's a screw up! Infiniti should have bumped up the car to do 4.9 seconds and put the 335i and others to shame.
That's a screw up! Infiniti should have bumped up the car to do 4.9 seconds and put the 335i and others to shame.
Welcome to the forums, tat. I'm too tired of this subject to even debate it... it has been beaten to death.
07-08-2007, 07:23 PM
#231
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dartmouth,Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hypnoz
I believe the stock E46 M3's dyno around 265-270whp. The weight difference is negated and they are thus nearly equal hp:weight.
I'd have to do some digging to find which mag actually said it, but if you really want I will. They are all biased. Most towards bimmer.
As I indicated, the M3 is better handling than the 335. The G37 (could be) slightly better handling than the 335, which could bring it close to the M3.
Let's just wait and see. No point in magazine racing for days on end... I can see now why most people don't take part in it.
I'd have to do some digging to find which mag actually said it, but if you really want I will. They are all biased. Most towards bimmer.
As I indicated, the M3 is better handling than the 335. The G37 (could be) slightly better handling than the 335, which could bring it close to the M3.
Let's just wait and see. No point in magazine racing for days on end... I can see now why most people don't take part in it.
07-08-2007, 10:48 PM
#232
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: FROM BROOKLKN NEW YORK NOW LIVE IN VALENCIA CA.
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2003-2006 specs of g35 vey close
Engine : V6, DOHC, front mid-engine RWD
Displacement : 3,498 cc
Valve : 24 valves, 4 valves per cylinder
Transmission : 6-spd manual, 5-spd automanual
Fuel economy : city - 19 mpg
highway - 26 mpg
Suspension : F - Independent multilink
R - Independent lower link A-arm
Brakes : F - Vented discs
R - Solid discs
Horsepower : 280 hp @ 6200 rpm('03-'04),
298 hp @ 6400 rpm('05-'06 manual), 280 hp('05-'06 auto)
Torque : 270 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm('03-'04),
260 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm('05-'06 manual), 270 lb-ft('05-'06 auto)
Redline : 6600 rpm
Top speed : 155 mph(electronically limited)
0-60 mph : 5.6 sec.('03 manual). 6.2 sec.(auto)
0-¼ mile : 14.2 sec @ 100.5 mph('03 manual)
60-0 braking distance : 117 ft
200 ft skidpad : 0.92 g
Curb Weight : 3416 lbs
Overall length : 182.2 in.
Wheelbase : 112.2 in.
Overall Width : 71.5 in.
Height : 54.8 in.
Engine : V6, DOHC, front mid-engine RWD
Displacement : 3,498 cc
Valve : 24 valves, 4 valves per cylinder
Transmission : 6-spd manual, 5-spd automanual
Fuel economy : city - 19 mpg
highway - 26 mpg
Suspension : F - Independent multilink
R - Independent lower link A-arm
Brakes : F - Vented discs
R - Solid discs
Horsepower : 280 hp @ 6200 rpm('03-'04),
298 hp @ 6400 rpm('05-'06 manual), 280 hp('05-'06 auto)
Torque : 270 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm('03-'04),
260 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm('05-'06 manual), 270 lb-ft('05-'06 auto)
Redline : 6600 rpm
Top speed : 155 mph(electronically limited)
0-60 mph : 5.6 sec.('03 manual). 6.2 sec.(auto)
0-¼ mile : 14.2 sec @ 100.5 mph('03 manual)
60-0 braking distance : 117 ft
200 ft skidpad : 0.92 g
Curb Weight : 3416 lbs
Overall length : 182.2 in.
Wheelbase : 112.2 in.
Overall Width : 71.5 in.
Height : 54.8 in.
07-09-2007, 06:44 AM
#233
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 6969g35
2003-2006 specs of g35 vey close
Engine : V6, DOHC, front mid-engine RWD
Displacement : 3,498 cc
Valve : 24 valves, 4 valves per cylinder
Transmission : 6-spd manual, 5-spd automanual
Fuel economy : city - 19 mpg
highway - 26 mpg
Suspension : F - Independent multilink
R - Independent lower link A-arm
Brakes : F - Vented discs
R - Solid discs
Horsepower : 280 hp @ 6200 rpm('03-'04),
298 hp @ 6400 rpm('05-'06 manual), 280 hp('05-'06 auto)
Torque : 270 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm('03-'04),
260 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm('05-'06 manual), 270 lb-ft('05-'06 auto)
Redline : 6600 rpm
Top speed : 155 mph(electronically limited)
0-60 mph : 5.6 sec.('03 manual). 6.2 sec.(auto)
0-¼ mile : 14.2 sec @ 100.5 mph('03 manual)
60-0 braking distance : 117 ft
200 ft skidpad : 0.92 g
Curb Weight : 3416 lbs
Overall length : 182.2 in.
Wheelbase : 112.2 in.
Overall Width : 71.5 in.
Height : 54.8 in.
Engine : V6, DOHC, front mid-engine RWD
Displacement : 3,498 cc
Valve : 24 valves, 4 valves per cylinder
Transmission : 6-spd manual, 5-spd automanual
Fuel economy : city - 19 mpg
highway - 26 mpg
Suspension : F - Independent multilink
R - Independent lower link A-arm
Brakes : F - Vented discs
R - Solid discs
Horsepower : 280 hp @ 6200 rpm('03-'04),
298 hp @ 6400 rpm('05-'06 manual), 280 hp('05-'06 auto)
Torque : 270 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm('03-'04),
260 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm('05-'06 manual), 270 lb-ft('05-'06 auto)
Redline : 6600 rpm
Top speed : 155 mph(electronically limited)
0-60 mph : 5.6 sec.('03 manual). 6.2 sec.(auto)
0-¼ mile : 14.2 sec @ 100.5 mph('03 manual)
60-0 braking distance : 117 ft
200 ft skidpad : 0.92 g
Curb Weight : 3416 lbs
Overall length : 182.2 in.
Wheelbase : 112.2 in.
Overall Width : 71.5 in.
Height : 54.8 in.
07-09-2007, 03:52 PM
#234
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-11-2007, 04:22 AM
da45king
Registered User Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 285
iTrader: (0)
I'm guessing a pesimistic 5.3 0-60 by road & track for the 6mt(5.5 auto)
and 5.5 0-60 for motor trend for (6mt) 5.7 for auto....mt numbers are usually slower.
Magazine testing is flawed. my supposed 5.8 0-60(with simple intake an exhaust with 100k miles on it) car consistently beats the **** out of a 5.3 0-60 car (z).
da45king
View Public Profile
Send a private message to da45king
Find all posts by da45king
Add da45king to Your Buddy List
don't get a cookie for this prediction?
da45king
Registered User Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 285
iTrader: (0)
I'm guessing a pesimistic 5.3 0-60 by road & track for the 6mt(5.5 auto)
and 5.5 0-60 for motor trend for (6mt) 5.7 for auto....mt numbers are usually slower.
Magazine testing is flawed. my supposed 5.8 0-60(with simple intake an exhaust with 100k miles on it) car consistently beats the **** out of a 5.3 0-60 car (z).
da45king
View Public Profile
Send a private message to da45king
Find all posts by da45king
Add da45king to Your Buddy List
don't get a cookie for this prediction?
07-12-2007, 04:08 PM
#235
Registered User
Originally Posted by Hypnoz
I believe the stock E46 M3's dyno around 265-270whp. The weight difference is negated and they are thus nearly equal hp:weight.
I'd have to do some digging to find which mag actually said it, but if you really want I will. They are all biased. Most towards bimmer.
As I indicated, the M3 is better handling than the 335. The G37 (could be) slightly better handling than the 335, which could bring it close to the M3.
Let's just wait and see. No point in magazine racing for days on end... I can see now why most people don't take part in it.
I'd have to do some digging to find which mag actually said it, but if you really want I will. They are all biased. Most towards bimmer.
As I indicated, the M3 is better handling than the 335. The G37 (could be) slightly better handling than the 335, which could bring it close to the M3.
Let's just wait and see. No point in magazine racing for days on end... I can see now why most people don't take part in it.
07-16-2007, 07:37 AM
#237
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That M3 was a beast and now that the V8 is coming out OMG
Actually if you go to the M3 forum, you'll find that the reaction to the E92 M3 by owners of the E46 M3 is more negative than the reaction of G35 owners to the G37. Lots of unhappy M guys. Again the expectations were sky high, and although the result was good, it wasn't spectacular, at least in the minds of many existing M owners.
Actually if you go to the M3 forum, you'll find that the reaction to the E92 M3 by owners of the E46 M3 is more negative than the reaction of G35 owners to the G37. Lots of unhappy M guys. Again the expectations were sky high, and although the result was good, it wasn't spectacular, at least in the minds of many existing M owners.
07-22-2007, 06:58 PM
#238
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
whether its 4.9sec 0-60 or more doesn't make me a difference. anyhow when they come up with these specs.. is the spare tire in? what kind of oil? gas? tires? road conditions etc. these things all have to be factored in. i know for sure with someone weighing around 250 they're not going to get 4.9 maybe 5.0 or 5.1 the G is fast enough stock for the money. just drive safe and enjoy the car. i now i will i mostly care about how the car accelerates after 80-90.. my brothers wrx sti acceleration drops to a crawl after hitting 110.. for me thats when it just starts getting interesting. the g37 sounds greater than the g35 at higher rpm.. hopefully will be faster at top end too....
07-22-2007, 07:41 PM
#239
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: PNW
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by WinglessG
whether its 4.9sec 0-60 or more doesn't make me a difference. anyhow when they come up with these specs.. is the spare tire in? what kind of oil? gas? tires? road conditions etc. these things all have to be factored in. i know for sure with someone weighing around 250 they're not going to get 4.9 maybe 5.0 or 5.1 the G is fast enough stock for the money. just drive safe and enjoy the car. i now i will i mostly care about how the car accelerates after 80-90.. my brothers wrx sti acceleration drops to a crawl after hitting 110.. for me thats when it just starts getting interesting. the g37 sounds greater than the g35 at higher rpm.. hopefully will be faster at top end too....
.......that's what I thought.
