G37 Coupe
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By:

G37 Tech Specs, Features & Options

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2007, 02:05 PM
  #91  
frshgcoupe
Registered User
 
frshgcoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: long island
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sounds like someone needs a change of pants!
Old 04-06-2007, 11:06 PM
  #92  
dennisjai
Registered User
 
dennisjai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
asdsddasdas

Last edited by dennisjai; 04-06-2007 at 11:10 PM.
Old 04-07-2007, 08:18 AM
  #93  
SPEEED
Registered User
 
SPEEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Just outside the Big Apple
Posts: 6,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great post Shane. Thanks.
Old 04-24-2007, 04:12 PM
  #94  
Waz
Registered User
 
Waz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sun/Moon Roof

I thought a moonroof only tilts, but a sunroof can slide open (or tilt).
Old 04-27-2007, 01:30 PM
  #95  
muscarel
Registered User
 
muscarel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In some of the previous literature, they mentioned a more refined 6-speed transmission. I initially was excited as that seems to be the only lasting sticky point with the G (refinement).

The final drive changed to 3.69, which was different than the 07 Z and 07 G coupe. That gave me some confidence that the tranny would finally change - but I just noticed that the 07 sedan has the same final drive ratio. DOes this mean that the "more refined" 6-speed is actually just an improvement over the old coupe, but not necessarily "new" as it is in the sedan already?
Old 04-27-2007, 01:35 PM
  #96  
RBull
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
RBull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dartmouth,Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by muscarel
In some of the previous literature, they mentioned a more refined 6-speed transmission. I initially was excited as that seems to be the only lasting sticky point with the G (refinement).

The final drive changed to 3.69, which was different than the 07 Z and 07 G coupe. That gave me some confidence that the tranny would finally change - but I just noticed that the 07 sedan has the same final drive ratio. DOes this mean that the "more refined" 6-speed is actually just an improvement over the old coupe, but not necessarily "new" as it is in the sedan already?
Good question. The revised rear drive ratio in both suggests there is a chance another part of the drivetrain (trans) will also be the same.
Old 04-30-2007, 12:02 PM
  #97  
GT-Ron
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
GT-Ron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The literature also uses "new" or "refined" in conjuction with "lightweight" to describe the 6MT, which gives me hope of more significant improvement over the current 6MT. Doesn't help much, but it does appear that there were some significant revisions. I never remember the current 6MT being described as "lightweight"... ...although it's not exactly robust either.

I can't wait for good reviews of the production-model 6MT... ...or a test-drive of my own to determine the difference.
Old 04-30-2007, 05:03 PM
  #98  
muscarel
Registered User
 
muscarel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GT-Ron
The literature also uses "new" or "refined" in conjuction with "lightweight" to describe the 6MT, which gives me hope of more significant improvement over the current 6MT. Doesn't help much, but it does appear that there were some significant revisions. I never remember the current 6MT being described as "lightweight"... ...although it's not exactly robust either.

I can't wait for good reviews of the production-model 6MT... ...or a test-drive of my own to determine the difference.
The more I think of it, the more I believe it's the same unit from the '07 sedan. DOesn't seem to make sense to change the transmission in 07 just to change it again for the new coupe. Especially now that I see the gear ratios changed to match that of the sedan. I think alot of items are probably a carryover from the sedan but are considered "new" or "revised" because they are comparing it to the previous coupe. Not necessarily new for the G line.
Old 04-30-2007, 06:16 PM
  #99  
finagle69
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
finagle69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,929
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by muscarel
The more I think of it, the more I believe it's the same unit from the '07 sedan. DOesn't seem to make sense to change the transmission in 07 just to change it again for the new coupe. Especially now that I see the gear ratios changed to match that of the sedan. I think alot of items are probably a carryover from the sedan but are considered "new" or "revised" because they are comparing it to the previous coupe. Not necessarily new for the G line.
This is exaclty how i read it. much the same as "36% stiffer suspension"; stiffer than that of the existing coupe, not the new sedan.

of course your argument of "DOesn't seem to make sense to change the transmission in 07 just to change it again for the new coupe" can be disproved by looking at the engine change
Old 07-01-2007, 06:11 PM
  #100  
mal_TX
Registered User
 
mal_TX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FAST1
I defined low end by being under 5K RPM. If you spend all your time driving at redline, then you're in that .00000001% that I alluded to. Most car owners don't like to have to drive at 7K RPM to experience a car's power, especially when the price of a gallon of gas is approaching $3 again. If you aren't impressed by the 335, then you are in a tiny minority again.
You burn plenty of fuel accelerating hard in a very torquey car at low RPMs.. nearly the same as revving high. So yeah, let's forget about the "gas prices" thing.. I could understand if people don't want to rev high because it is loud or whatever, but it doesn't have THAT much to do with the fuel consumption.

Winding the motor up quickly (at low or high revs) is what uses the fuel. The high revs just use a little more due to increased friction, but not nearly as much as you imply.
Old 07-01-2007, 06:12 PM
  #101  
mal_TX
Registered User
 
mal_TX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by finagle69
This is exaclty how i read it. much the same as "36% stiffer suspension"; stiffer than that of the existing coupe, not the new sedan.

of course your argument of "DOesn't seem to make sense to change the transmission in 07 just to change it again for the new coupe" can be disproved by looking at the engine change
The increase is stiffness refers to the chassis -- the car itself is 36%-40% stiffer depending on which article you are reading. Suspension may or may not be stiffer.

When I had an 07 G sedan as a loaner, the increased chassis stiffness was an OBVIOUS improvement in the car's behavior.
Old 07-12-2007, 05:35 PM
  #102  
tmac911
Registered User
 
tmac911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does any1 know what the interior would look like without NAV?
Old 07-12-2007, 05:39 PM
  #103  
Yimbie
Yin-Yang and Life
 
Yimbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Apple Valley, CA
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tmac911
Does any1 know what the interior would look like without NAV?
Same. The screen is still there. The nav buttons are just changed.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
slowbird
G37 Sedan
15
08-03-2023 07:54 PM
b2autodesigns
Brakes/Suspension
128
03-24-2018 07:44 PM
Team_STILLEN
Future Models
13
09-05-2016 03:13 PM
sLADe781
Brakes, Suspension, Wheels & Tires
32
11-28-2015 03:23 AM
m3clubracer
G37 Sedan
14
08-21-2015 01:45 PM



Quick Reply: G37 Tech Specs, Features & Options



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:08 PM.