EPS discontinued their pcv breather kit, heres a video I found as alternative
#92
Registered Member
Thread Starter
so @bull i came across this today
https://www.z1motorsports.com/z1-pro...t-p-22585.html
i submitted a question asking if they experienced any crankcase problems, buildup of pressure etc.
tldr: theyre 3 inch intakes with the barb fitting after MAF
makes me wonder if these companies followed a trend on the 3 inch intakes with the open vented system.
You cant say AT does it to sell you his catch cans, cause it seems every solo company that makes 3 inch intakes on the vhr's dont have the fitting except Z1. interesting
https://www.z1motorsports.com/z1-pro...t-p-22585.html
i submitted a question asking if they experienced any crankcase problems, buildup of pressure etc.
tldr: theyre 3 inch intakes with the barb fitting after MAF
makes me wonder if these companies followed a trend on the 3 inch intakes with the open vented system.
You cant say AT does it to sell you his catch cans, cause it seems every solo company that makes 3 inch intakes on the vhr's dont have the fitting except Z1. interesting
#93
Registered Member
iTrader: (2)
so @bull i came across this today
https://www.z1motorsports.com/z1-pro...t-p-22585.html
i submitted a question asking if they experienced any crankcase problems, buildup of pressure etc.
tldr: theyre 3 inch intakes with the barb fitting after MAF
makes me wonder if these companies followed a trend on the 3 inch intakes with the open vented system.
You cant say AT does it to sell you his catch cans, cause it seems every solo company that makes 3 inch intakes on the vhr's dont have the fitting except Z1. interesting
https://www.z1motorsports.com/z1-pro...t-p-22585.html
i submitted a question asking if they experienced any crankcase problems, buildup of pressure etc.
tldr: theyre 3 inch intakes with the barb fitting after MAF
makes me wonder if these companies followed a trend on the 3 inch intakes with the open vented system.
You cant say AT does it to sell you his catch cans, cause it seems every solo company that makes 3 inch intakes on the vhr's dont have the fitting except Z1. interesting
I personally prefer to keep the system like stock
#94
Registered Member
Thread Starter
#95
Moderador
so @bull i came across this today
https://www.z1motorsports.com/z1-pro...t-p-22585.html
i submitted a question asking if they experienced any crankcase problems, buildup of pressure etc.
tldr: theyre 3 inch intakes with the barb fitting after MAF
makes me wonder if these companies followed a trend on the 3 inch intakes with the open vented system.
You cant say AT does it to sell you his catch cans, cause it seems every solo company that makes 3 inch intakes on the vhr's dont have the fitting except Z1. interesting
https://www.z1motorsports.com/z1-pro...t-p-22585.html
i submitted a question asking if they experienced any crankcase problems, buildup of pressure etc.
tldr: theyre 3 inch intakes with the barb fitting after MAF
makes me wonder if these companies followed a trend on the 3 inch intakes with the open vented system.
You cant say AT does it to sell you his catch cans, cause it seems every solo company that makes 3 inch intakes on the vhr's dont have the fitting except Z1. interesting
In all honesty Panda's intake look really good.
In my opinion, get yourself the proper barbs for it and play around with the location. If I had the chance to do it I would choose the best location that would let me run a hose without a crazy bend.
Doing this to your intakes will feel like it'll hurt but technically it will make it hold it's value. When you think about it you already have to drop some coin on tuning on them and then you're forced to invest in a catch can?
By taking this step you're saving someone the time and money and this can be your reasoning at keeping the price close if not the same as new.
The other option is to copy Z1's approach and find a couple with a barb
How dare you post this sexyness
#96
Moderador
Buy two of these and take a leap of faith on some couplers. Looking around there doesnt seem like anyone makes them. Z1 has moved into manufacturing of their own products so there will be many unique parts created by them.
#97
Registered Member
Thread Starter
TLDR: have to mess around with the spacing, and were gonna try the coupler approach first, as long as everything can fit, we should be good
#101
Registered Member
Thread Starter
like bull said they should have an option for users to keep or delete. admin said to me that it builds too much pressure lack of performance etc. So when z1 says that its okay it raises an eyebrow
#102
Registered Member
iTrader: (2)
OEM cars run a closed loop system so, its not a large negative. Down side for sure is some chances of oil in the intake track.
the user can still delete it by plugging the port.
#103
Registered Member
Thread Starter
Different tuners will have slightly different experiences. Both Jon at Z1 and Moncef at Admin are great at their job, and you should go with which tuner you feel agrees with your idea.
OEM cars run a closed loop system so, its not a large negative. Down side for sure is some chances of oil in the intake track.
the user can still delete it by plugging the port.
OEM cars run a closed loop system so, its not a large negative. Down side for sure is some chances of oil in the intake track.
the user can still delete it by plugging the port.
The following users liked this post:
projectpanda13 (12-08-2022)
#105
Moderador
The issue here is personal agenda on a commercially produced product that is in the hands of a young crowd lead by the Highest and Most which leads to the "Best"
Nothing grinds my gears more than the sheer ignorance of asking the masses which product should they choose based only on the "BEST" when the client doesn't even care about the best. Just doesn't want to make a wrong move and be bullied online.
The demand for the best is satisfied simply by obtaining some data + looks + backed behind by results that only focuses "Highest/ Most" Folks simply make some average math based on these results and simply try to replicate these results.
There is no proven point venting is any better other than word of mouth + past experience with high revving decent hp making engines. This pressure has to go somewhere but it seems like the consensus is concentrated on introducing oil into the cylinder which lowers power
Nothing grinds my gears more than the sheer ignorance of asking the masses which product should they choose based only on the "BEST" when the client doesn't even care about the best. Just doesn't want to make a wrong move and be bullied online.
The demand for the best is satisfied simply by obtaining some data + looks + backed behind by results that only focuses "Highest/ Most" Folks simply make some average math based on these results and simply try to replicate these results.
There is no proven point venting is any better other than word of mouth + past experience with high revving decent hp making engines. This pressure has to go somewhere but it seems like the consensus is concentrated on introducing oil into the cylinder which lowers power
The following users liked this post:
bread (12-08-2022)