Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
Have Technical Questions or Done Modifications to the G37? Find out the answer in here!

Review Motordyne M370 Manifold Review w/ Comparisons!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-15-2010, 11:30 PM
  #1  
Staples
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Staples's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Bel Air, MD
Posts: 1,659
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Motordyne M370 Manifold Review w/ Comparisons!

First off, I want to thank Tony and Motordyne for everything they did to get the manifold out to me in a timely manner. I was fortunate enough to get it shipped from California to Maryland within 3 days.

Now, onto the good stuff! I wanted to personally see this manifold in action and see what the gains were going to be for my current mod list (Fast Intentions exhaust, Fast Intention Res Test Pipes, Stillen G3 Intakes, and Motordyne's Manifold). I had a custom UpRev tune from the get-go from a couple months prior, so I figured the gains were minimal in the beginning, but I still wanted to bite the bullet and see what the capabilities of this plenum were.

Broken down are multiple sheets to give you an idea of what type of gains were seen before we started tuning the vehicle and after (now remember, the car came in with a custom tune already).

This first sheet describes the Horsepower / Torque gains through 4 different runs. Runfile 001, 002 are both baseline pulls when we slapped the car on the dyno to see what it put down in comparison to after the plenum was installed.

Runfile 001 - Baseline
Runfile 002 - Baseline

Runfile 010 - Motordyne M370 w/ 12.8 Air/Fuel ratio
Runfile 011 -Motordyne M370 w/ 13.0 Air/Fuel ratio



The car seems to really like the extra fuel. We gained an extra 2whp just making the minor change of adding fuel closer to redline to get the car as close to top-end as possible. With comparing run 002, and 010 the gains were pretty good. We saw positives gains all throughout the powerband except for 7400 - redline (lost 1 - 2whp, no biggie).

From 4500 - 5500 - there were gains of 12whp, and 12ft-lbs of torque

From 5500 - 6200 4whp and 6ft-lbs

From 6300 - 6900 6whp and 7 ft-lbs

The rest were minimal gains with a minor loss at redline. The car had a pretty good amount of heatsoak since were making consistent runs to change minor things like timing and fuel so the torque would have been even higher if we let the car cool down for 15 minutes (it was getting late).

Here are run graph comparisons that Tony was ever so kind to export:








We didn't really do consistent runs at the end because it was getting late, so I didn't have the time to let the ECU fully adjust to the new fuel curves. I can tell you though that my butt dyno feels the kick, I know for a fact that isn't a placebo effect either.

All in all I'm really happy with the outcome. I'm glad it made more power over-top my other mods and tune. I would definitely buy this all over again!
Old 11-15-2010, 11:33 PM
  #2  
WPPJR30
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
WPPJR30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 3,033
Received 53 Likes on 38 Posts
Nice review.
Old 11-15-2010, 11:34 PM
  #3  
Staples
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Staples's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Bel Air, MD
Posts: 1,659
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Thanks
Old 11-15-2010, 11:41 PM
  #4  
911turbo
Registered Member
iTrader: (3)
 
911turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Biloxi, MS
Posts: 1,751
Received 42 Likes on 28 Posts
any pictures?
Old 11-15-2010, 11:41 PM
  #5  
xyz
Registered Member
iTrader: (1)
 
xyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 988
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wow . . . thanks for the info.

looks like pretty good gains on tq on the mid-range. . . where this engine needs the most . . .
Old 11-16-2010, 12:28 AM
  #6  
Staples
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Staples's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Bel Air, MD
Posts: 1,659
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by 911turbo
any pictures?
Pictures aren't really necessary since it's pretty much a modified stock manifold. The only difference is the Motordyne engine cover, but you could still use the Infiniti cover if you wanted to.
Old 11-16-2010, 12:48 AM
  #7  
wakeboardr116
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
wakeboardr116's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,308
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Those TQ numbers look really nice. You wouldn't happen to have the actual dyno run files (.drf files) to upload would you?
Old 11-16-2010, 12:52 AM
  #8  
Staples
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Staples's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Bel Air, MD
Posts: 1,659
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by wakeboardr116
Those TQ numbers look really nice. You wouldn't happen to have the actual dyno run files (.drf files) to upload would you?
I do, if you're interested in them... PM me your email.
Old 11-16-2010, 01:25 AM
  #9  
advan37
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
advan37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: UAE
Posts: 425
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Nice review man .
Old 11-16-2010, 01:38 AM
  #10  
G37HKS
Registered User
 
G37HKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dubai
Posts: 506
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
gratz staples, though i saw ur post earlier in other forum,

i was torn about this mod gains tq more than hp, but hmm it seems that im right..

i cant wait to see how this manifold will perform with F.I cars
Old 11-16-2010, 01:40 AM
  #11  
Staples
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Staples's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Bel Air, MD
Posts: 1,659
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by JimmiesG
gratz staples, though i saw ur post earlier in other forum,

i was torn about this mod gains tq more than hp, but hmm it seems that im right..

i cant wait to see how this manifold will perform with F.I cars
I think I'm going to pull the trigger and go with the STS rear mounted single turbo setup. I'm working out the logistics with STS as we speak.
Old 11-16-2010, 01:45 AM
  #12  
G37HKS
Registered User
 
G37HKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dubai
Posts: 506
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
i wouldnt recommend that system..

i mean,.. I never heard of such a thing before lool..

in logic way, if this system was good then some factories would release their cars with turbo system like that one (STS)

just go with GTM TT
Old 11-16-2010, 02:23 AM
  #13  
rAiN
Registered Member
iTrader: (5)
 
rAiN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,620
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Staples
I think I'm going to pull the trigger and go with the STS rear mounted single turbo setup. I'm working out the logistics with STS as we speak.

mmmm sound of STS is AMAZING
Old 11-16-2010, 02:31 AM
  #14  
cvt
Registered User
 
cvt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
nice gains...looks like power all through the band. reminds me of the kind of gains tony did for rev-up DE engines.
Old 11-16-2010, 08:54 AM
  #15  
Kidcane
Florida G Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Kidcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tampa
Posts: 8,105
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Interesting. My friend with a 370 did not make out as well with this mod.


Quick Reply: Review Motordyne M370 Manifold Review w/ Comparisons!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:03 PM.