Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
Have Technical Questions or Done Modifications to the G37? Find out the answer in here!

GTM Performance Engineering Stage 1 Turn key Supercharger kit In house Instal II

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-20-2010, 12:43 AM
  #16  
Staples
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Staples's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Bel Air, MD
Posts: 1,659
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Ivoidwarranties
I think it's way more complicated than a forum post could cover. Way too many variables to discuss. Books have been written about this. I do know that saying you need "backpressure" to create boost is incorrect.
I'm saying to keep boost you have to have back-pressure on a supercharger system. On a turbo, the less restriction the better. Plus the proof is in the pudding, look at Shumby's build. Long-tube headers and 2.5" exhaust he couldn't get anymore then 4psi. Why? because the lack of back-pressure. Put the stock exhaust back on, boom made more power at a full 6psi.
Old 06-20-2010, 07:13 AM
  #17  
mikelr
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
mikelr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North East
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
It really has nothing at all to do with the exhaust system..... the restrictions of the stock headers, cats and muffler are just a means to an end here. The real problem is intake/exhaust valve overlap. Our engines are designed and tuned to be high output per liter normally aspirated machines. In this situation there is a point in the engines cycle as its transitioning from exhaust stroke to intake stroke where the exhaust valve is closing and the intake valve is opening (both valves open slightly at the same time), this situation causes an increase in volumetric efficiency due to the exiting gases actually pulling the intake charge into the cylinder (think siphoning effect). This gets the intake charge moving earlier in the cycle and in some situations creates a "ram air" effect at certain rpm ranges depending on intake lengths and resonate frequencies.
Now if your super charged, the boost that is being built up behind the closed intake valve in the intake manifold literally blows through the opening intake and out the closing exhaust valve wasting the pressure that was built and lowering the amount of boost potential from the blower.
So it’s not really an exhaust problem, it’s a valve timing problem.

Class dismissed......
Old 06-20-2010, 07:44 AM
  #18  
PennywiseG35S
Registered User
 
PennywiseG35S's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mikelr
It really has nothing at all to do with the exhaust system..... the restrictions of the stock headers, cats and muffler are just a means to an end here. The real problem is intake/exhaust valve overlap. Our engines are designed and tuned to be high output per liter normally aspirated machines. In this situation there is a point in the engines cycle as its transitioning from exhaust stroke to intake stroke where the exhaust valve is closing and the intake valve is opening (both valves open slightly at the same time), this situation causes an increase in volumetric efficiency due to the exiting gases actually pulling the intake charge into the cylinder (think siphoning effect). This gets the intake charge moving earlier in the cycle and in some situations creates a "ram air" effect at certain rpm ranges depending on intake lengths and resonate frequencies.
Now if your super charged, the boost that is being built up behind the closed intake valve in the intake manifold literally blows through the opening intake and out the closing exhaust valve wasting the pressure that was built and lowering the amount of boost potential from the blower.
So it’s not really an exhaust problem, it’s a valve timing problem.

Class dismissed......
Great description, you on right on the money. Vehicles with older valvetrain technology have alot less valve overlap and actually benefit from less exhaust restrictions with a supercharger (viper, mustang, etc...) Not to mention if they had a problem, they could just throw in some new cams.
Old 06-20-2010, 08:41 AM
  #19  
Ivoidwarranties
Premier Member

iTrader: (7)
 
Ivoidwarranties's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Omaha
Posts: 2,078
Received 28 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Staples
I'm saying to keep boost you have to have back-pressure on a supercharger system. On a turbo, the less restriction the better. Plus the proof is in the pudding, look at Shumby's build. Long-tube headers and 2.5" exhaust he couldn't get anymore then 4psi. Why? because the lack of back-pressure. Put the stock exhaust back on, boom made more power at a full 6psi.
Mikelr has some of the info you need in the post below yours. I know what you are saying and I'm not trying to be mean or a jerk, but what you are saying is wrong. What they said the problem was with Shumby's car was wrong. We've discussed this a little more on the other sites.
Old 06-20-2010, 09:27 AM
  #20  
G37Sam
Administrator
 
G37Sam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Doha, Qatar
Posts: 12,184
Received 243 Likes on 193 Posts
Originally Posted by mikelr
It really has nothing at all to do with the exhaust system..... the restrictions of the stock headers, cats and muffler are just a means to an end here. The real problem is intake/exhaust valve overlap. Our engines are designed and tuned to be high output per liter normally aspirated machines. In this situation there is a point in the engines cycle as its transitioning from exhaust stroke to intake stroke where the exhaust valve is closing and the intake valve is opening (both valves open slightly at the same time), this situation causes an increase in volumetric efficiency due to the exiting gases actually pulling the intake charge into the cylinder (think siphoning effect). This gets the intake charge moving earlier in the cycle and in some situations creates a "ram air" effect at certain rpm ranges depending on intake lengths and resonate frequencies.
Now if your super charged, the boost that is being built up behind the closed intake valve in the intake manifold literally blows through the opening intake and out the closing exhaust valve wasting the pressure that was built and lowering the amount of boost potential from the blower.
So it’s not really an exhaust problem, it’s a valve timing problem.

Class dismissed......
I've been looking for an explanation for this, thanks for the write up

That could be why increasing the restriction in the exhaust system would force the boosted air in the chamber during valve overlap, or at least slow it down from escaping?
Old 06-20-2010, 09:29 AM
  #21  
mikelr
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
mikelr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North East
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by G37Sam
I've been looking for an explanation for this, thanks for the write up

That could be why increasing the restriction in the exhaust system would force the boosted air in the chamber during valve overlap, or at least slow it down from escaping?


Thats exactly what is happening grasshopper.....
Old 06-20-2010, 09:41 AM
  #22  
Q8y_drifter
Registered User
 
Q8y_drifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 970
Received 39 Likes on 9 Posts
lol

I'm still confused as to why GTM went with two filters and instead of just one large filter and filter-to-SC pipe. It would certainly bring the cost down a little :/
Old 06-20-2010, 09:47 AM
  #23  
Ivoidwarranties
Premier Member

iTrader: (7)
 
Ivoidwarranties's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Omaha
Posts: 2,078
Received 28 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by G37Sam
I've been looking for an explanation for this, thanks for the write up

That could be why increasing the restriction in the exhaust system would force the boosted air in the chamber during valve overlap, or at least slow it down from escaping?
It doesn't force the boosted (fresh) air in, it just restricts the exhaust (bad air) from going out. This makes your boost number go up but that doesn't guaranty power will go up. I'll try and link a picture of a top fuel engine below. Notice how there is no chance of "restriction" in there exhaust and they are running 45 pounds of boost.

Also, overlap is one of the ways to make big power up high in a n/a engine. At high rpm's the exhaust scavenging effect helps pull the incoming air in. This is at the sacrifice of low rpm manners though, rough idle, low vacuum... Usually you will see a performance cam for a boosted application act very tame on the street vs a performance cam dedicated for n/a.

Old 06-20-2010, 09:53 AM
  #24  
mikelr
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
mikelr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North East
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Ivoidwarranties
Also, overlap is one of the ways to make big power up high in a n/a engine. At high rpm's the exhaust scavenging effect helps pull the incoming air in. This is at the sacrifice of low rpm manners though, rough idle, low vacuum... Usually you will see a performance cam for a boosted application act very tame on the street vs a performance cam dedicated for n/a.
Thats where our VVEL system comes in...best of both worlds. This boost issue can be addressed with a little VVEL tuning. But I'm not sure at this point that GTM has the ability to do so with the software that they are using, or it may be just a time issue and they havent gotten around to tuning the VVEL system to optimise a free flowing exhaust system.
Old 06-20-2010, 12:10 PM
  #25  
Buddy Revell
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Buddy Revell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by OMG37
subscribed. Good luck Buddy...
Originally Posted by akuma_83
Subscribed ! Hope your car puts down some solid numbers ! GL !
Thanks, guys.

Originally Posted by mikelr
It really has nothing at all to do with the exhaust system..... the restrictions of the stock headers, cats and muffler are just a means to an end here. The real problem is intake/exhaust valve overlap. Our engines are designed and tuned to be high output per liter normally aspirated machines. In this situation there is a point in the engines cycle as its transitioning from exhaust stroke to intake stroke where the exhaust valve is closing and the intake valve is opening (both valves open slightly at the same time), this situation causes an increase in volumetric efficiency due to the exiting gases actually pulling the intake charge into the cylinder (think siphoning effect). This gets the intake charge moving earlier in the cycle and in some situations creates a "ram air" effect at certain rpm ranges depending on intake lengths and resonate frequencies.
Now if your super charged, the boost that is being built up behind the closed intake valve in the intake manifold literally blows through the opening intake and out the closing exhaust valve wasting the pressure that was built and lowering the amount of boost potential from the blower.
So it’s not really an exhaust problem, it’s a valve timing problem.

Class dismissed......
Good info. Thanks!

Last edited by Buddy Revell; 06-20-2010 at 12:15 PM.
Old 06-20-2010, 03:01 PM
  #26  
Staples
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Staples's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Bel Air, MD
Posts: 1,659
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by mikelr
Thats where our VVEL system comes in...best of both worlds. This boost issue can be addressed with a little VVEL tuning. But I'm not sure at this point that GTM has the ability to do so with the software that they are using, or it may be just a time issue and they havent gotten around to tuning the VVEL system to optimise a free flowing exhaust system.
Thanks for the explanation earlier. They do not have the ability of tuning the VVEL cam timing yet so that equation is out. Only air / fuel ratios and ignition timing. Seems like people are stuck between a rock and a hard place at this point.
Old 06-20-2010, 03:03 PM
  #27  
Staples
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Staples's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Bel Air, MD
Posts: 1,659
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Ivoidwarranties
Mikelr has some of the info you need in the post below yours. I know what you are saying and I'm not trying to be mean or a jerk, but what you are saying is wrong. What they said the problem was with Shumby's car was wrong. We've discussed this a little more on the other sites.
You're not being a jerk. I just wanted to catch up on the forum and see what the issue was. I'm curious to see if the competitor is going to have the same issue (I would assume so).
Old 06-20-2010, 04:08 PM
  #28  
mikelr
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
mikelr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North East
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Staples
You're not being a jerk. I just wanted to catch up on the forum and see what the issue was. I'm curious to see if the competitor is going to have the same issue (I would assume so).

I think with the head room the Vortec blower has over the Rotex they can literally push past this issue with brute force..
Old 06-20-2010, 05:26 PM
  #29  
Ivoidwarranties
Premier Member

iTrader: (7)
 
Ivoidwarranties's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Omaha
Posts: 2,078
Received 28 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by mikelr
Thats where our VVEL system comes in...best of both worlds. This boost issue can be addressed with a little VVEL tuning. But I'm not sure at this point that GTM has the ability to do so with the software that they are using, or it may be just a time issue and they havent gotten around to tuning the VVEL system to optimise a free flowing exhaust system.
Yes and no. The VVEL can only change the intake valve lift which just slightly effects overlap. If it could change the LSA then we would be talking something special. The new Viper's V-10 is able to adjust the LSA with their new CamInCam. They are able to move the exhaust lobes throughout the RPM range. Higher LSA down low and a lower LSA up high.
Old 06-20-2010, 06:03 PM
  #30  
mikelr
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
mikelr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North East
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Ivoidwarranties
Yes and no. The VVEL can only change the intake valve lift which just slightly effects overlap. If it could change the LSA then we would be talking something special. The new Viper's V-10 is able to adjust the LSA with their new CamInCam. They are able to move the exhaust lobes throughout the RPM range. Higher LSA down low and a lower LSA up high.
Agreed, but the amount of lift control is so dynamic that you could effectively delay the opening of the intake long enough to correct (or really mask) the issue.
I hope GTM works something out, I'm waiting on my SC kit and I'm running Stillen headers and Berk cats....


Quick Reply: GTM Performance Engineering Stage 1 Turn key Supercharger kit In house Instal II



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:31 PM.