Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
Have Technical Questions or Done Modifications to the G37? Find out the answer in here!

Realistic gains with Tune vs no tune.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-26-2010, 10:05 AM
  #1  
Hayabusa02
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Hayabusa02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Leominster, MA
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Realistic gains with Tune vs no tune.

I have a 2010 G37xS sedan with Stillen Gen 3 intakes and cat back exhaust. I want to get a dyno tune with UpRev, but my local shop said that they typically can only get around 5-10HP gain on a stock engine. They also are pushing me a bit towards Cobb ,but I like the dynamic changing of maps with the cruise control button using UpRev.

Can I expect to see more of a gain than that because I have the increased air flow from the intake and exhaust? I want to justify paying for the tune. I assume I will get a better Air/Fuel ratio and therefore the car will run that much better. But not sure it is worth it for only 5HP. What have people seen for gains when baselining the intake/exhuast and then after the tune?

Thoughts?

Last edited by Hayabusa02; 05-26-2010 at 10:30 AM.
Old 05-26-2010, 10:47 AM
  #2  
TreSe7en
Registered Member
iTrader: (2)
 
TreSe7en's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Okc, OK
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd suggest getting HFC or test pipes and then a tune, your suffocating yourself without it.
Old 05-26-2010, 11:24 AM
  #3  
G37Sam
Administrator
 
G37Sam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Doha, Qatar
Posts: 12,184
Received 243 Likes on 193 Posts
Gains from NA mods on our cars in general are very minimal
Old 05-26-2010, 11:26 AM
  #4  
Abdiel
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Abdiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some things to consider:

1. Do you plan to have any more intake/engine/exhaust mods done in the near future?
2. Is your local shop pushing you towards Cobb because they are more comfortable/experienced with it over UpRev?
3. A tune may not make significant improvements to the max hp/tq numbers but may improve hp/tq in the low-mid RPM range which is more beneficial in my opinion.
Old 05-26-2010, 11:39 AM
  #5  
Hayabusa02
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Hayabusa02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Leominster, MA
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1. Near Future, no. Couple of years...I plan on putting a supercharger on the car. It just only has 2500 miles on it, so not going to rush

2. They are pushing me to Cobb because they think it is much easier to use and perform the tune. If it weren't for the "Valet" mode option with UpRev, I wouldn't care. Until I get the Supercharger, I could live without it anyway

3. I agree...I'm just trying to understand how Cobb (for example) says its tune adds over 11% HP/Tq and my tuner is saying 5-10HP total, unless they are including adding the mods themselves.
Old 05-26-2010, 11:41 AM
  #6  
LightsOut
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
LightsOut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: (323)-(909)
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
get the uprev and go to another shop.

but since you plan on going with a SC later in time, might as well get HFC and tune now.. then later you can reflash car again for a lower cost.
Old 05-26-2010, 12:37 PM
  #7  
RISKY GUY
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
RISKY GUY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,078
Received 43 Likes on 31 Posts
They tell you that so you don't bananas & complain.

Mine told me the same thing i was told no more than 5.

I netted 14whp from my tune.

Im a coupe, but gains should be similar.

BTW I have hfc's stillen stage 3 intake & cobb tune.

You deffinatly need either test pipes or hfc's.
Old 05-26-2010, 01:02 PM
  #8  
Hayabusa02
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Hayabusa02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Leominster, MA
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, the reason I haven't jumped on the HFC solution is I wasn't sure on an NA car, they would be a good thing. I know that on induction motors, they benefit from less air restriction on the exhaust, but NA cars need some restriction.
Old 05-26-2010, 02:31 PM
  #9  
GraphiteG37S
Registered User
iTrader: (29)
 
GraphiteG37S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Simi 805 - SoCal
Posts: 7,107
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
I say don't waste money on a tune until you get hfc. You may be taking more air in, but stock cats are choking your power on the way out. Take it from me and risky guy as we are both uprev tuned, I believe Sam is as well.

Uprev doesn't just creat more HP it stabalized a/f ratio and makes the car run much better with all the bolt ons. It also allows for a more stable power curve and created more lowend and midrange power, which is probably used most frequently. In my auto, it gave me a better throttle response and change the pedal at WOT to allow I htink 90% power, and stock I think it's like 75%ish or something, but don't quote me on that. I have to double check my dyno sheets but I think I netted 18WHP, which I was happy with and feel everytime I get on it. No more hesitation or delay, or sluggish off the line due to incorrect a/f ratio.

There's many benefits to a tune, including the switching of maps on the fly. I usually leave my tune map on all the time. And I'm finding under easy driving I'm getting better mpg than with the economy map.
Old 05-26-2010, 02:31 PM
  #10  
LightsOut
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
LightsOut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: (323)-(909)
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
out of the whole exhaust system on the G's is the cats. free them up!

one guy posted he gained 7whp from cats alone
Old 05-26-2010, 02:57 PM
  #11  
GraphiteG37S
Registered User
iTrader: (29)
 
GraphiteG37S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Simi 805 - SoCal
Posts: 7,107
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
^ some have seen gains as much as 10hp from hfc.
Old 05-26-2010, 03:57 PM
  #12  
LightsOut
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
LightsOut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: (323)-(909)
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
which is even better!
Old 05-26-2010, 04:26 PM
  #13  
Q8y_drifter
Registered User
 
Q8y_drifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 970
Received 39 Likes on 9 Posts
yup, i gained 7whp and that was after I already had a CAI and cat back. Gains can be anywhere from 10-25whp depending on mods, fuel, conditions, etc. That gain of course is made throughout the powerband so it's definitely something that you will feel. I will be tuning my car soon using Uprev. My current AFR hovers around 14:1 and dips to about 13.5:1 over 7K rpm. I'll post my results when I get it done
Old 05-26-2010, 05:26 PM
  #14  
GraphiteG37S
Registered User
iTrader: (29)
 
GraphiteG37S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Simi 805 - SoCal
Posts: 7,107
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
I think UPREV was well worth the money. Car overall drives and feels much better.

Most import thing is the tuner can play with A/F ratio to create a nice smooth power curve instead of being all over the place at different RPM.
Old 05-26-2010, 05:59 PM
  #15  
RISKY GUY
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
RISKY GUY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,078
Received 43 Likes on 31 Posts
actually have the cobb.
one of the best features is the valet mode I had to use it the other day.plus the anti theft maps,if you don't want your car started.and I agree 100% about the a/f ratio.
these cars quite the pain in the a$$,to adjust but the car is so much more responsive.


Quick Reply: Realistic gains with Tune vs no tune.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:29 PM.