Engine, Drivetrain & Forced-Induction
Have Technical Questions or Done Modifications to the G37? Find out the answer in here!

Stillen/GTM Supercharger Pros, Cons, and Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-31-2010 | 08:11 PM
  #16  
kyle@stillen's Avatar
kyle@stillen
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 211
Likes: 3
Mike- Great post, this is the perfect platform for GTM and STILLEN to answer questions that people might have on the kits.

Josh has done a really nice job of answering the questions on this thread but I just wanted to jump in and answer the question about where boost is being measured.

During our testing we are actually measuring boost from two locations. One before the intercooler, and one behind in the manifold. This is so that we can see if there is any boost drop across the intercooler. The 7.9 psi that we have recorded is being measured in the manifold behind the intercooler.
Old 03-31-2010 | 08:21 PM
  #17  
da mayor's Avatar
da mayor
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,651
Likes: 36
From: Long Island, NY
thanks Mike.... need more info on the M37 supercharged project!
Old 03-31-2010 | 09:18 PM
  #18  
whiddles's Avatar
whiddles
Registered Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 2
From: ft hood texas, Middletown,CT
so kyle was there any loss? what was the psi before the cooler?
Old 03-31-2010 | 09:26 PM
  #19  
kyle@stillen's Avatar
kyle@stillen
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 211
Likes: 3
We did have a slight loss across the intercooler but we re-designed the intercooler so that we no longer have that. Even if there was a little bit of boost loss across the face of the intercooler it really doesn't matter because the boost pressure going into the engine is what really matters.
Old 03-31-2010 | 09:31 PM
  #20  
G37Sam's Avatar
G37Sam
Administrator
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 12,184
Likes: 243
From: Doha, Qatar
Originally Posted by kyle@stillen
We did have a slight loss across the intercooler but we re-designed the intercooler so that we no longer have that. Even if there was a little bit of boost loss across the face of the intercooler it really doesn't matter because the boost pressure going into the engine is what really matters.
Ok it's getting confusing here.. by intercooler you mean the pipes running inside the manifold or the heat exchanger behind the bumper?



If it's the one behind the bumper then I don't see how there would be boost loss accross it anyways when boost isn't passing through it in the first place?

If it's the one inside the manifold, then how can boost drop not be important?
Old 03-31-2010 | 09:32 PM
  #21  
whiddles's Avatar
whiddles
Registered Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 2
From: ft hood texas, Middletown,CT
True i just wanted to know for effiency thinkings. they changed the design of the manifold that lost pressure is my guess. and the loss was probably 0.1 psi.
Old 03-31-2010 | 09:40 PM
  #22  
kyle@stillen's Avatar
kyle@stillen
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 211
Likes: 3
Whiddles is right...The loss was almost nothing. We just made some modifications to improve the intercooler so that there as no drop in boost and the intercooler is actually more important. And like I said...The 7.9 psi that we stated was AFTER the intercooler...So the engine was still seeing nearly 8 psi...It's not like it was 7.9 before the intercooler then dropped...

When looking at an air to water intercooler setup the intercooler is inside the manifold and the heat exchanger is mounted out front by the radiator.
Old 03-31-2010 | 09:48 PM
  #23  
G37Sam's Avatar
G37Sam
Administrator
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 12,184
Likes: 243
From: Doha, Qatar
What powers the water pump in your cooling system Kyle?
Old 03-31-2010 | 09:57 PM
  #24  
kyle@stillen's Avatar
kyle@stillen
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 211
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by G37Sam
What powers the water pump in your cooling system Kyle?
It's an electric water pump.
Old 03-31-2010 | 10:13 PM
  #25  
whiddles's Avatar
whiddles
Registered Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 2
From: ft hood texas, Middletown,CT
if the air gets denser at the intake manifold from above that to me makes me thing the SC would have to work less. but i guess not. Warm air less dense than cool air right? so 8 psi less dense air should equal a greater psi of dense air?
Old 03-31-2010 | 10:16 PM
  #26  
WhosUrBuddiee's Avatar
WhosUrBuddiee
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,915
Likes: 4
What is the size of the frount heat exchanger? Any pictures of it mounted?

Say a member has a Ionic or Auto X grill. Can the heat exchanger be mounted behind the large opening?


Also can the heat exchanger.... say be powder coated black with STILLEN in red across the front?

Example
Name:  G37-17.jpg
Views: 4261
Size:  69.6 KB
Old 03-31-2010 | 10:17 PM
  #27  
whiddles's Avatar
whiddles
Registered Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 2
From: ft hood texas, Middletown,CT
?[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]

I just wanted to point out the miss spelled manifold. (mainfold) just to let you know.

P.S. I know I can't spell worth of crap
Old 03-31-2010 | 10:22 PM
  #28  
Mike's Avatar
Mike
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,549
Likes: 20
Originally Posted by whiddles
if the air gets denser at the intake manifold from above that to me makes me thing the SC would have to work less. but i guess not. Warm air less dense than cool air right? so 8 psi less dense air should equal a greater psi of dense air?
Yes. Ultimately, the mass of the air doesn't change (pV = nRT), but the cooler intake charge allows for either more air to be sucked in (same volume, higher density), more compression (cooler air can compress more before getting to detonation temps), and more advanced timing (again, cooler air, even after compression), all of which ultimately either add to safety and/or power. In this case, it mainly allows for the first two.

An air-to-air and air-to-water essentially do the same thing, which is cool the intake charge, just via different methods.
Old 03-31-2010 | 10:37 PM
  #29  
whiddles's Avatar
whiddles
Registered Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 2
From: ft hood texas, Middletown,CT
Got it. love physics. NOT
Old 03-31-2010 | 10:43 PM
  #30  
Weiboy718's Avatar
Weiboy718
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 4,967
Likes: 4
From: Homo Capital!
man, you guys know so much about FI. hopefully i'll have some luck with this and not run into too many problems.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:43 AM.