Review Tuned with Cobb Accessport!
12-22-2009 | 01:55 PM
#48
Yeah, but chamelion's dyno is very giving when it comes to horsepower numbers. I've seen people make 300whp with just high flow cats. Every dyno is going to read differently, and it's hard to compare numbers because of weather, humidty, and a number of other things that play a role. As I've said before, it's about the numbers made from the tune, not from the overall number.
exactly my baseline hp#s were 311rwhp before the tune
when complete 325rwhp.I never left so numbers were dead on.
thats 14 whp (not to mention i had an exhaust leak at the time)
as far his dyno giving higher numbers than it should is total B/S.
your dyno netted you 17whp, almost the exact same numbers,so his dyno cant be off if was I would have better numbers.
How long do you he would be in business if a tunner has his numbers inflated.No offense but in his defense, now your talking smack.
his numbers on his dyno are right on the money,so comparing apples to apples.and mine was done on a 90 degree day.so if anything we will see my new numbers once i get the exhaust fixed.
12-22-2009 | 02:12 PM
#49
exactly my baseline hp#s were 311rwhp before the tune
when complete 325rwhp.I never left so numbers were dead on.
thats 14 whp (not to mention i had an exhaust leak at the time)
as far his dyno giving higher numbers than it should is total B/S.
your dyno netted you 17whp, almost the exact same numbers,so his dyno cant be off if was I would have better numbers.
How long do you he would be in business if a tunner has his numbers inflated.No offense but in his defense, now your talking smack.
his numbers on his dyno are right on the money,so comparing apples to apples.and mine was done on a 90 degree day.so if anything we will see my new numbers once i get the exhaust fixed.
when complete 325rwhp.I never left so numbers were dead on.
thats 14 whp (not to mention i had an exhaust leak at the time)
as far his dyno giving higher numbers than it should is total B/S.
your dyno netted you 17whp, almost the exact same numbers,so his dyno cant be off if was I would have better numbers.
How long do you he would be in business if a tunner has his numbers inflated.No offense but in his defense, now your talking smack.
his numbers on his dyno are right on the money,so comparing apples to apples.and mine was done on a 90 degree day.so if anything we will see my new numbers once i get the exhaust fixed.
Temperature has absolutely NO BEARING on your whp reading, if your numbers are properly corrected.
While we're at it, lets also add that Chameleon's dyno is at a relatively low altitude.
12-22-2009 | 08:57 PM
#54
of course it does.especially I have stage 3 intake.lower intake temp more hp.amd a hot car that just was in traffic for 2 hrs in stop and go vs a cold run when its like 20 out.of course it makes a diff.
12-24-2009 | 01:26 AM
#55
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 5
From: Bel Air, MD
w00t I just took the car back to the tuner today because I had a couple lean spots at wide open throttle that were getting in the 13.0 - 13.1 range. A couple weeks back I made 331whp at 268ft-lbs, well today since we dropped it down to 12.8 across the board... I put down 335whp at 268ft-lbs My baseline was 330 - 268. So I gained between 4-5 extra whp today which means I made a total of 21whp on the tune. The temperatures were the same between both days I had the car tuned and you can tell because the dyno was only 1whp off from the other week with the same exact torque (pretty coincidental).
From 331whp - 335whp, yay!
From 331whp - 335whp, yay!
just messing..
12-24-2009 | 05:27 PM
#59
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 5
From: Bel Air, MD
It is, but instead of just confusing everyone I just gave out a percentage, unless you want a specific answer. Me saying 10% more is a lot easier to comprehend then me saying 24.2 total on a stock timing of 22.0 lol.
