My Dyno numbers for all my mods....
#46
AZ, must of had a senior moment but got it right in the title. I can't believe all the skepticism and arm chair coaching about the pulley. It's pure phyicis, anyone who wants to enlghten themselves go to this site. http://www.physicsnews!.com/question_15.html AZ I'm still wondering about the "CF" interior?
#47
Carbon fiber
AZ, heres one I've had contact with. http://www.WoodDashExperts.com They have a good selection of CF interiors specificly for the G37 but they just go over the present pieces I'm still debating on that. I sent for their samples and like what I see. Bboy don't get on me, this is the last post about CB on this thread.
#52
#53
^^ Please read all the posts, This was my first statement on the entire thread, "First off, let me apologize for not having all the scans of my dyno sheets. I started to scan all the ones I've collected, 5 total, but my scanner went out on me, so I only have 2 of the 5 graphs to show you. I do have all the #'s, and will update with graphs later when I can afford a new scanner." The other graphs will be up when I can buy a new scanner. LIKE I SAID TO BEGIN WITH
#54
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
very nice solid gains. These are nice numbers for this highly sophisticated motor. I will say this is close to the N.A limit of this car, considering camshafts will not be availible for this car.. FI will not be as attractive for this car because no standalone will be compatible with VVEL, let alone those that have 4WAS.
I would like to point out that these dyno runs should be averaged though to fully reflect the actual mods... when we tested for our y-pipe, there was a +- of 5-6 whp across 5-6 runs. Same time, same conditions, i remember the highest peak was like 285 while the lowest was like 278. The averaged of the gains where like 2 whp in the upper ranges only and thats why we gave up on the project.
I would like to point out that these dyno runs should be averaged though to fully reflect the actual mods... when we tested for our y-pipe, there was a +- of 5-6 whp across 5-6 runs. Same time, same conditions, i remember the highest peak was like 285 while the lowest was like 278. The averaged of the gains where like 2 whp in the upper ranges only and thats why we gave up on the project.
#55
Premier Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 3,346
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
The shop I go to will be closed due to them going to Nationals for Napa I believe so no dyno and install for me until the end of September. I have the pulley here next to me and my FI exhaust is on the way. No install for a couple weeks so this is going to suck.
#57
My bad, bro. After Sharif's post, I thought you had posted the relevant dynos and that he and I somehow missed it.
^^ Please read all the posts, This was my first statement on the entire thread, "First off, let me apologize for not having all the scans of my dyno sheets. I started to scan all the ones I've collected, 5 total, but my scanner went out on me, so I only have 2 of the 5 graphs to show you. I do have all the #'s, and will update with graphs later when I can afford a new scanner." The other graphs will be up when I can buy a new scanner. LIKE I SAID TO BEGIN WITH
Last edited by Buddy Revell; 09-04-2008 at 09:53 PM.
#60
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^^ Please read all the posts, This was my first statement on the entire thread, "First off, let me apologize for not having all the scans of my dyno sheets. I started to scan all the ones I've collected, 5 total, but my scanner went out on me, so I only have 2 of the 5 graphs to show you. I do have all the #'s, and will update with graphs later when I can afford a new scanner." The other graphs will be up when I can buy a new scanner. LIKE I SAID TO BEGIN WITH
Enjoy the power....this is very nice.