My Dyno numbers for all my mods....
09-04-2008, 03:08 AM
#31
Terrible , if im reading this right the smilies are in regards to my comment about two tuners . Isnt the person that is standing in front of the computer , has the power to make or ruin your day while your tires just got done spinning on a dyno called a tuner . Even if they do not tune your car and just give you dyno numbers usually that person is a tuner
Trust me I want max hp too some mods work great some ok and some just dont work .
Trust me I want max hp too some mods work great some ok and some just dont work .
Last edited by NeverBoneStock; 09-04-2008 at 03:12 AM.
09-04-2008, 03:27 AM
#32
I think the smiles are also due to the fact that the only dyno performed on a different machine/location/shop/tuner was my second. The base dyno with no mods was done on dyno "a" at location "a". Dyno "b" and location "B" were the second dyno run of my Stillen cat-back. All remaining dynos were performed on dyno "a" and location "a" just like the base run. That means the dyno of my full exhaust showed a gain of 25hp over my base run, and both were done on the same dyno, same location, same "tuner". this also goes for the pulley dyno, showing 5hp, and the JWT dyno showing 7hp. This fact also holds true for the total hp gain of 37hp, because the base dyno and the final dyno of 301 were performed on the same dyno, same location, same "tuner." Can we please clear this up once and for all?? There isn't any factors, or variables, or catches here. Granted it wasn't a "perfect" scenario seeing as I didn't have my base dyno and all other dynos performed at the same time/day. But to dispute a 5hp gain because of this is foolish IMO.
09-04-2008, 10:19 AM
#35
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cincy, OH
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The different dyno's are really a non-issue if you are just trying to analyze power from the pulley. As long as the dyno run was done on the same dyno for what is technically the base run for the pulley (dyno with full exhaust after the ecu caught up which = 289 HP) and the actual pull with the pulley (dyno after pulley with 294 HP) than numbers will be usable.
Who knows if they're perfectly accurate just because some variables would undoubtably have changed between dynos (ambient/humidity etc.), but I doubt these things alone could account for 6 hp unless their were drastically different conditions between.
Who knows if they're perfectly accurate just because some variables would undoubtably have changed between dynos (ambient/humidity etc.), but I doubt these things alone could account for 6 hp unless their were drastically different conditions between.
09-04-2008, 10:37 AM
#36
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: UP Of Michigan
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Those are excellent numbers and well documented, in my opinion.
Did you do any 0-60 or 1/4 mile times during the process?
Threads like this might be put somewhere as a "sticky" or something.
A handy reference showing the money spent and the gains that resulted.
Did you do any 0-60 or 1/4 mile times during the process?
Threads like this might be put somewhere as a "sticky" or something.
A handy reference showing the money spent and the gains that resulted.
09-04-2008, 12:40 PM
#40
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Southern Cali
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Doesn't really mean much unless you dyno it again on the same machine. Yes, we already know you stated your peak numbers over the stock baseline on the same dyno. But I'd also like to know what the powerband looks like compared to stock.
Either way, great numbers.
.
Either way, great numbers.
.
09-04-2008, 12:56 PM
#41
Sam Rothstein
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Riverside/San Diego, CA
Posts: 10,435
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Doesn't really mean much unless you dyno it again on the same machine. Yes, we already know you stated your peak numbers over the stock baseline on the same dyno. But I'd also like to know what the powerband looks like compared to stock.
Either way, great numbers.
.
Either way, great numbers.
.
BTW, nice gains AZ...
Time for a reflash!
09-04-2008, 01:04 PM
#42
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Southern Cali
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If i'm not mistaken, he did... From what i understand, he did a total of 4 runs... Of those 4 runs, run numbers 1,3, and 4 were performed on the same dyno, while #2 (and only #2) was performed on a different one... So therefore his baseline and his final run (run #4) were both performed on the same dyno...
BTW, nice gains AZ... Time for a reflash!
BTW, nice gains AZ...
Time for a reflash!
That would help out alot. It's not always about peak numbers, but also about how much average HP/TQ was gained throughout the powerband.
.
09-04-2008, 01:51 PM
#44
Registered User
Thanks for postin up that info AZg37. You are going to drive out of the Technosquare parking lot with a huuuge smile on your face after all those mods....
09-04-2008, 02:18 PM
#45
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
oop's
AZ, must of had a senior moment but got it right in the title. I can't believe all the skepticism and arm chair coaching about the pulley. It's pure phyicis, anyone who wants to enlghten themselves go to this site. http://www.physicsnews1.com/question_15.html AZ I'm still wondering about the "CF" interior?
Last edited by chucky; 09-04-2008 at 02:29 PM.