Stillen Crank Pulley
#167
Registered User
Well, I went to Engine Logics to have my UR pulley installed, as they could not break the crank bolt loose. I will try another shop soon, then dyno the results. Sorry guys, I am dissappointed also, as I really wanted to see the results.
#170
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cincy, OH
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
haha ^^^ word, I don't know how you can call your shop engine logic and not manage a crank pulley. Did they give you a reason? was it an accessibility issue or they just couldn't get it loose.
#171
Banned
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hot Az
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Many times the factory bolt gets siezed on there. There are a few "tricks" to crank it off, Im surprised they couldnt do it. This usually happends on older vehicles where the bolts been siezed on there for awhile.
#172
Registered User
i totally understand about how hard it is to take off OEM bolts....... my HFC took forever to install cause of those OEM bolts..... but this is different so... yea....
#173
#175
Nuts are nuts and bolts are bolts.
On the other hand, if you look at how nuts are matched with bolts at the factory, this might make more sense. If the nuts are installed while they're hot or if the heat of installation is considered...
#176
If we assume that the diameter of the lighter pulley is the same as stock, I would think that the force required to turn the light pulley would be less than that required to turn the stock pulley, hence a gain in power.
Bet you can't really see that on a dyno chart.
On the other hand, if the lightened pulley diameter is different such that it's not turning the other pulleys at the same rate...
I seem to remember having to do that kind of problem in physics class. Of course, back in my day, we used physics version one. Maybe it's different now.
Any input from the mechanical engineering students out there?
Bet you can't really see that on a dyno chart.
On the other hand, if the lightened pulley diameter is different such that it's not turning the other pulleys at the same rate...
I seem to remember having to do that kind of problem in physics class. Of course, back in my day, we used physics version one. Maybe it's different now.
Any input from the mechanical engineering students out there?
Last edited by KahnQuistador; 09-02-2008 at 11:12 PM. Reason: Question
#179
I'll go with that. Show me the money.
I don't post much anymore because my car is done until the tires wear out. Then I'll do the suspension and maybe the wheels. I AM thinking about a cam kit when they're available from Stillen. Decent gains with the right cams and a (flame, flame) Hondata type ECU system. Flash is good, programmable is where it's at. No forced induction with this car, though; wouldn't be prudent. Might need a better fuel pump and bigger injectors, though.
Until then, I'll probably just chime in to pi$$ off certain people when they get stupid and try to violate the laws of physics.
Where's the dyno?
I don't post much anymore because my car is done until the tires wear out. Then I'll do the suspension and maybe the wheels. I AM thinking about a cam kit when they're available from Stillen. Decent gains with the right cams and a (flame, flame) Hondata type ECU system. Flash is good, programmable is where it's at. No forced induction with this car, though; wouldn't be prudent. Might need a better fuel pump and bigger injectors, though.
Until then, I'll probably just chime in to pi$$ off certain people when they get stupid and try to violate the laws of physics.
Where's the dyno?