G37S VVEL Twin Turbo, 4.5L Stroker... DYNO INSIDE AS WELL
02-18-2008, 01:23 PM
#17
Registered User
for hp doesn't always mean good times...you need traction. go on a supra forum and see how many people pushing 700whp are getting down below 10s...hp is only a part of the story, you need a good set up to get all that power to the ground without spinning your tires for 5 seconds...lol
02-18-2008, 02:30 PM
#21
Registered User
02-18-2008, 02:39 PM
#22
does 600-1000 hp mean 335, M3 killa?!
And yall wanted me to sell my G lol. Solo also was one that told me that! I'm surprised solo didn't even know the G could do all of this...
I'm also surprised that a lot of u don't feel a G37 TT will come into development giving the fact a after market TT can give those results. The G37 sounds like a Freak to me
And yall wanted me to sell my G lol. Solo also was one that told me that! I'm surprised solo didn't even know the G could do all of this...
I'm also surprised that a lot of u don't feel a G37 TT will come into development giving the fact a after market TT can give those results. The G37 sounds like a Freak to me
I dont think anyone is arguing it CAN be done. You can make just about anything like that work IF you have the money and time to invest. There has been a G35 on Driver for about 2 years now that they have been trying to make a Q45 engine fit in but STILL no track tests or numbers.
So yes Krazy J, you should keep your G37 and spend another $30K to make it 1000HP. So less "Ima do this" and "what do you think about this" ridiculous talk and more action. MAKE IT HAPPEN!!! DO IT! DO IT!!
02-27-2008, 05:01 PM
#24
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
...Also not to forget the dual side air-dams that line up exactly as if this car is going to have an intercooler and twin-turbos someday.
It's got a nice strong transmission, you can tell from the drive-shaft.
The HR engine revs higher so it's got fewer moving parts and is already inherently strengthened to do so.
The compression ratio is relatively high already. For an NA engine this true compression is achieved only at higher rpms. However this can be used to an advantage if turbos are tuned to provide strong induction at lower revs, and taper off more gracefully towards high rpms.
There's lots of room to play with!
It's got a nice strong transmission, you can tell from the drive-shaft.
The HR engine revs higher so it's got fewer moving parts and is already inherently strengthened to do so.
The compression ratio is relatively high already. For an NA engine this true compression is achieved only at higher rpms. However this can be used to an advantage if turbos are tuned to provide strong induction at lower revs, and taper off more gracefully towards high rpms.
There's lots of room to play with!
02-27-2008, 11:56 PM
#26
...Also not to forget the dual side air-dams that line up exactly as if this car is going to have an intercooler and twin-turbos someday.
It's got a nice strong transmission, you can tell from the drive-shaft.
The HR engine revs higher so it's got fewer moving parts and is already inherently strengthened to do so.
The compression ratio is relatively high already. For an NA engine this true compression is achieved only at higher rpms. However this can be used to an advantage if turbos are tuned to provide strong induction at lower revs, and taper off more gracefully towards high rpms.
There's lots of room to play with!
It's got a nice strong transmission, you can tell from the drive-shaft.
The HR engine revs higher so it's got fewer moving parts and is already inherently strengthened to do so.
The compression ratio is relatively high already. For an NA engine this true compression is achieved only at higher rpms. However this can be used to an advantage if turbos are tuned to provide strong induction at lower revs, and taper off more gracefully towards high rpms.
There's lots of room to play with!
Transmission strong because of the driveshaft? are you serious. The way the DS looks has nothing to do with the internals of the gearbox. I have not heard of any major issues yet with the box.
high compression is never good for a high boosted car. And the numbers people are talking about would not be possible on the stock motor with stock comp...
02-28-2008, 02:24 AM
#27
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dude the front bumper and faux air vents meaning nothing for an intercooler or piping. nissan didnt design the bumper with an intercooler in mind. if that was the case the non sport bumper wouldnt be around because its horrible for intercoolers just like the old G35 bumper sucked. you had to drill holes into it for maximum airflo.
Transmission strong because of the driveshaft? are you serious. The way the DS looks has nothing to do with the internals of the gearbox. I have not heard of any major issues yet with the box.
high compression is never good for a high boosted car. And the numbers people are talking about would not be possible on the stock motor with stock comp...
Transmission strong because of the driveshaft? are you serious. The way the DS looks has nothing to do with the internals of the gearbox. I have not heard of any major issues yet with the box.
high compression is never good for a high boosted car. And the numbers people are talking about would not be possible on the stock motor with stock comp...
And you can totally tell how much force can be transmitted through a system by looking at it's weakest link...It's a reasonable judgement.
Sure many like you prefer low compression-ratios to begin with because it's easier to boost a car with low compression. A boosted engine will still have a higher 'effective' compression ratio than NA because that's what it's all about!!
11:1 will not hurt especially when you have event lift to play with...you have more control over the mass of mixture entering the chambers...We cannot claim how much max HP this engine can get, but I feel that it can easily handle a more than stock power....after all it's a Nissan Skyline, come on!
02-28-2008, 02:47 AM
#28
Who knows what Nissan was thinking about with whatever facia or location of fake air dams...but there is room for an intercooler without posing any obvious piping issues to the turbos!
And you can totally tell how much force can be transmitted through a system by looking at it's weakest link...It's a reasonable judgement.
Sure many like you prefer low compression-ratios to begin with because it's easier to boost a car with low compression. A boosted engine will still have a higher 'effective' compression ratio than NA because that's what it's all about!!
11:1 will not hurt especially when you have event lift to play with...you have more control over the mass of mixture entering the chambers...We cannot claim how much max HP this engine can get, but I feel that it can easily handle a more than stock power....after all it's a Nissan Skyline, come on!
And you can totally tell how much force can be transmitted through a system by looking at it's weakest link...It's a reasonable judgement.
Sure many like you prefer low compression-ratios to begin with because it's easier to boost a car with low compression. A boosted engine will still have a higher 'effective' compression ratio than NA because that's what it's all about!!
11:1 will not hurt especially when you have event lift to play with...you have more control over the mass of mixture entering the chambers...We cannot claim how much max HP this engine can get, but I feel that it can easily handle a more than stock power....after all it's a Nissan Skyline, come on!
so by looking at the DS you can tell the trans is bulletproof huh. Ok again back to the S2000 the DS is extremely strong on the car, yet the trans and diff were some of the weakest parts on the car. So your idea of looking at the ds failed there.
Again ya you can boost a car with a 11:1 comp but your not going to make the kind of power that has been talked about in this thread. And saying after all its a skyline is just kinda goofy. This is not the mighty gtr skyline...
02-28-2008, 03:08 AM
#30
Registered Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dude everyone understands that most ideas expressed here are speculations...so quit trying to prove that my 'opinions' are wrong...because I am not saying that I'm stating 'facts'...just valid 'opinions' worth thinking about. Unless the engineers at Nissan were bozos, I believe that they matched the MT with a DS that's within spec of whatever they were intending for this platform.
Secondly, we all know that the VQ37HR is not 'designed' for a turbos...that's why we're talking about possibilities of modding.
Thirdly, the Nissan GTR is not a Skyline anymore.
Secondly, we all know that the VQ37HR is not 'designed' for a turbos...that's why we're talking about possibilities of modding.
Thirdly, the Nissan GTR is not a Skyline anymore.