Canada Serving Canada.

my winters - 18" BSA 264's & blizzak's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-2008, 01:58 PM
  #31  
Loki123
Registered Member
 
Loki123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wanted to see the response of a 2nd Infiniti dealership with my question of what snow tire size would you recommend - and they said basically the same as the first dealership, 225/45R18's for front and 245/45R18's for the rear. I asked him if he could explain why the staggered set-up and he said that this vehicle was designed with a staggered tires to provide certain handling characteristics, which will be changed should I go with 225's all around. He said the car won't perform the same with 225's (dry or snow)...
Old 10-14-2008, 02:00 PM
  #32  
nogoodname
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
nogoodname's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 6,437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
okay, in the summer it may make a difference. but in the winter 225 is good to have all around. Narrow is always better to cut through snow, wide tires would have to much snow under the tire.
Old 10-14-2008, 02:08 PM
  #33  
Loki123
Registered Member
 
Loki123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^^Ya, exactly that makes sense to me - I'm just perplexed as to why both dealerships say Infiniti Canada recommends 225 in the front and wider 245's in the rear? These are Ottawa dealerships - maybe I should call Montreal or T.O. dealers and here what they have to say...
Old 10-14-2008, 02:08 PM
  #34  
PSYH
Post Whore
 
PSYH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
^^^ Again, +1 million!

They'll have to be more specific with what kind of handling characteristics would change having all 225s. The ability to cut through snow better with thinner tires trumps all other "characteristics" in my books.
Old 10-14-2008, 03:34 PM
  #35  
shumby
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
shumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: With your mom
Posts: 2,668
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Come again?
Old 10-14-2008, 04:51 PM
  #36  
PSYH
Post Whore
 
PSYH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Who, me? I was referring to post #31.
Old 10-15-2008, 12:05 AM
  #37  
Ru5tY
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Ru5tY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Loki123
Wanted to see the response of a 2nd Infiniti dealership with my question of what snow tire size would you recommend - and they said basically the same as the first dealership, 225/45R18's for front and 245/45R18's for the rear. I asked him if he could explain why the staggered set-up and he said that this vehicle was designed with a staggered tires to provide certain handling characteristics, which will be changed should I go with 225's all around. He said the car won't perform the same with 225's (dry or snow)...
Thanks for calling around to check.
But as the other posters have mentioned, it still doesn't make sense for winter...lol...

With regards to the fronts only, I'm still not sure why Infiniti recommends 225/45R18. That would result in a 3.7% difference (as calculated in my prev. post) versus the OEM 225/45R19.

So far, Tirerack's recommendation of 225/50R18 all around makes the most sense. I'll get that size when my 225/45R18's are toast.
Old 10-15-2008, 12:20 AM
  #38  
Ru5tY
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Ru5tY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One thing just came to mind - for a stock G37S, do the rear wheels have negative camber??
(looks like YES... https://www.myg37.com/forums/showthr...egative+camber )

Also, is the rear negative camber the same for G37 and G37S?

I remember reading a while ago that stock G35's and 350z's had negative camber, which helped improve handling. But in the case for 350z's, that also led to the notorious tire feathering issue.

So let's say a stock G37S did have some negative camber - if we put a slimmer tire on the back (225 instead of 245), doesn't the decrease in tire width cause result in slightly more negative camber than with 245?
But according to the link above, they put a wider tire and it made the camber even more noticeable. I'm confused.
Does a slimmer tire reduce negative camber, or increase negative camber???

Thoughts?
Old 10-15-2008, 01:06 AM
  #39  
PSYH
Post Whore
 
PSYH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have my guesses, but nothing to back them up. lol

Maybe others are more knowledgeable in this area.
Old 10-15-2008, 01:36 AM
  #40  
Nighthawk26
Registered User
 
Nighthawk26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You guys are making this SO much more complicated than it needs to be.

All of this is virtually irrelevant. In the winter the roads are so cold, any performance improvement you would get from running negative camber (mostly tighter more agile cornering) are completely lost becasue you'd be runnign the car hard enough that the back end woul dbe all over the place.

I track my MR2 on the drag strip and on the track. On the drag strip you can just get more power to the ground with wider tires (I run 265's), and they help a bit on the track going through tight corners. Again, none of which matters when it's cold out and your tires are stickign anyways.

And like everyone else has mentioned, narrower tires will ALWAYS help get you through the snow better.

As for being off 3.7%, who really cares? Differnet tire places are going to suggest whatever they stick more readily, ESPECIALLY online stores.

I really hope no one is loosign sleep over this. I assure you 95% of people wouldn't know the difference when in either setup.
Old 10-15-2008, 09:59 AM
  #41  
HP_John
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
HP_John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow, Simplytires' price for the Blizzak LM-25 alone (not including wheels) is about $120 cheaper than TireRack once you factor shipping, duty, & current exchange rate ($1 US = $1.14 Cdn). That is pretty good for a Cdn retailer.
Old 10-15-2008, 10:04 AM
  #42  
PSYH
Post Whore
 
PSYH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What's their URL? Can't find them on google...
Old 10-15-2008, 10:11 AM
  #43  
Nighthawk26
Registered User
 
Nighthawk26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HP_John
Wow, Simplytires' price for the Blizzak LM-25 alone (not including wheels) is about $120 cheaper than TireRack once you factor shipping, duty, & current exchange rate ($1 US = $1.14 Cdn). That is pretty good for a Cdn retailer.
Wow, I want to know what bank you're dealing with!

I'm thinking maybe you've done that backwards?
Old 10-15-2008, 11:08 AM
  #44  
nogoodname
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
nogoodname's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 6,437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by shumby
Come again?
huh? what are you confused about this time...lol
Old 10-15-2008, 11:44 AM
  #45  
PSYH
Post Whore
 
PSYH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Nighthawk26
Wow, I want to know what bank you're dealing with!

I'm thinking maybe you've done that backwards?
www.xe.com
$1USD = $1.17972CAD


Quick Reply: my winters - 18" BSA 264's & blizzak's



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:23 AM.