Audio, Video & Electronics Post questions, reviews, and other general info about the G's Nav, sound system, satellite radio or aftermarket stereos

Letter from Valentine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-03-2008, 01:13 AM
  #16  
Snareman
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Snareman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brentvino169
The problem with the Escort 9500i and its TrueLock feature, advertised to help cut down on falses, is that it's flawed. The Escort 9500i breaks K band down into only 8 segments. If you TrueLock a false alert, it will no longer alert to any K band in that particular segment of K band in that location. If a cop happens to be shooting K band in that location and it happens to fall into that segment of K band, you will not get an alert and you could possibly receive a ticket.

Many stores have multiple door openers operating in all segments of K band so you could be locking out alerts for much of the entire K band if you TrueLock out all of the "falses" in that area. Every segment of K band you lock out will block 12.5% of all K band alerts in that area whether it is real police radar or a false alert.

The Valentine One and the Escort 9500i have two entirely different ways of dealing with police radar frequencies.

You have the Valentine One that will notify the driver of all police radar frequencies in use and let the driver decide what to filter out in their brain so they can react accordingly.

Then you have the Escort 9500i user who would rather have a nice quiet drive at the risk of receiving no alert and a speeding ticket because they let a computer judge what is a threat or not because they TrueLocked a false in an area where a cop decided to later run radar. Escort doesn't let you know on their website or in their Escort 9500i manual but if you TrueLock just one door opener, it will block 12.5% of the K band frequency in an area up to a 1/2 mile wide. A 1/2 mile area is equivalent to 7 1/3 football fields including endzones.

Do you want to risk receiving a ticket because your Escort 9500i was silent for over seven football fields because you didn't want any falses?
Well, I see your point and if its accurate it makes sense. However, as a long time V1 user and die hard supporter, in the past several months I've all but stopped paying attention to it. The number of falses with the installation of these highway camera things has become outrageous. So I'm not sure whats worse - having a detector that cries wolf until the time that the wolf is actually there you don't believe it or having a detector that ocasionally misses the wolf, but which you can for the most part trust that when you get an alert, that its likely to be real and you should pay attention to it. I'm not sure what the right answer there is. I guess with the Escort its a calculated risk you may accept that there is going to be a cop in that location using that same frequency. I even had some state troopers using X band last week. I didn't know they still made X band radars.
Old 12-03-2008, 03:00 AM
  #17  
Snareman
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Snareman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some interesting reading on the 9500...

http://www.radardetector.net/forums/...fo-tricks.html

http://www.radardetector.net/forums/...o-today-2.html

Its either take the risk of mising a ticket because I don't trust the falsing of my V1 or because my 9500 might have blocked the area out.
Old 12-03-2008, 08:40 PM
  #18  
w0ady
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
w0ady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: jacksonville, fl
Posts: 4,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^all of this is why i still love my 8500. less false alarms than the v1 without the complications of gps.
Old 12-04-2008, 01:17 AM
  #19  
Snareman
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Snareman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by w0ady
^all of this is why i still love my 8500. less false alarms than the v1 without the complications of gps.
Well, I would have stuck with the V1 if I wanted the more sensitive detector. And, I would have still had the arrows <== /\ ==>
Old 12-04-2008, 02:06 AM
  #20  
mal_TX
Registered User
 
mal_TX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lol w0ady

you can turn off the trulock feature and the 9500xi if you prefer to be paranoid and still benefit from speed sensitive sensitivity, auto dimming, sound sensitive volume control, speed indication on an alert, redlight cams, speed cams, and lots of different display options including real-time speed indicator.

just cuz trulock may not be 100% perfect doesn't mean an 8500 or a V1 is in the same league as a 9500xi. Fact is both of those guys are obsolete and anyone buying a high-end radar TODAY should either wait for a V2 or get a 9500.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GXXXVII
General Tech Questions
11
12-11-2021 08:58 AM
UNV-IT46
D.I.Y. Installations/Modifications
138
05-27-2019 02:54 PM
Depravity
Private Classifieds
28
10-16-2015 01:37 PM
blazeplacid
Audio, Video & Electronics
12
09-17-2015 10:50 AM



Quick Reply: Letter from Valentine



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 AM.