The EX - Crossover General discussion for the EX Crossover

Road Test Comparison: EX35 vs X3 vs RDX vs RX350 vs FX35

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 06:40 PM
  #1  
gcoupe's Avatar
gcoupe
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: NC
Road Test Comparison: EX35 vs X3 vs RDX vs RX350 vs FX35

A member over at vwvortex, who works for Nissan, test drove a pre-production EX and gives his impressions.

http://forums.vwvortex.com/zerothread?id=3399662



Reply
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 07:00 PM
  #2  
hullio's Avatar
hullio
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: GTA, Ontario, Canada Eh ;)
Good find! Thanks
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 07:07 PM
  #3  
N50's Avatar
N50
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
From: 301, 269
Sweet...nice find. The interior alone makes this car. Well, maybe not but I think it is twice as interesting as the exterior.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 11:40 PM
  #4  
Balzac72's Avatar
Balzac72
G SQUAD
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
If that's the final version, I guess I won't be buying one after all. Those wheel wells look 4 sizes too large or maybe it's the wheels are 4 sizes too small.

The rear seat is unacceptable, considering the exterior dimensions. Maybe they should have trimmed some snout off of the nose or considered a bit more "cab forward" design to be able to get the front and rear seats between the wheel wells with at least leg room for average sized adults in the rear.

I was expecting this to be an edgier version of the FX, a car that's MORE athletic and able to put the power down to the ground more effectively. Now I'm thinking its a tall wagon with technology.

I am disappointed. I hope this 'preproduction' version gets revised.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2007 | 12:05 PM
  #5  
Gashed's Avatar
Gashed
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Balzac72
If that's the final version, I guess I won't be buying one after all. Those wheel wells look 4 sizes too large or maybe it's the wheels are 4 sizes too small.

The rear seat is unacceptable, considering the exterior dimensions. Maybe they should have trimmed some snout off of the nose or considered a bit more "cab forward" design to be able to get the front and rear seats between the wheel wells with at least leg room for average sized adults in the rear.

I was expecting this to be an edgier version of the FX, a car that's MORE athletic and able to put the power down to the ground more effectively. Now I'm thinking its a tall wagon with technology.

I am disappointed. I hope this 'preproduction' version gets revised.


Rear seat comfort and overall capacity has me worried as well. I think the vehicle is beautiful, but the reason I'd get a cross over is to enjoy driving and have the family wagon capability as well. I guess the proof is in the pudding, can't wait to see one in person and make my own conclusions.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2007 | 12:23 PM
  #6  
RBull's Avatar
RBull
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: Dartmouth,Nova Scotia, Canada
Originally Posted by Balzac72
If that's the final version, I guess I won't be buying one after all. Those wheel wells look 4 sizes too large or maybe it's the wheels are 4 sizes too small.

The rear seat is unacceptable, considering the exterior dimensions. Maybe they should have trimmed some snout off of the nose or considered a bit more "cab forward" design to be able to get the front and rear seats between the wheel wells with at least leg room for average sized adults in the rear.

I was expecting this to be an edgier version of the FX, a car that's MORE athletic and able to put the power down to the ground more effectively. Now I'm thinking its a tall wagon with technology.

I am disappointed. I hope this 'preproduction' version gets revised.
At this stage of the vehicle it's nearly guaranteed the vehicle won't have the major design revision you're speaking of.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2007 | 06:32 PM
  #7  
cyco's Avatar
cyco
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: VA
Error
You must be logged in to view this forum.

» Go Back

Reply
Old Aug 20, 2007 | 09:26 PM
  #8  
Garnet Canuck's Avatar
Garnet Canuck
Traveling Administrator
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,744
Likes: 3
From: Rothesay, New Brunswick, Canada
That was a very objective review, I really enjoyed reading his comments on all of them.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 07:40 AM
  #9  
RBull's Avatar
RBull
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: Dartmouth,Nova Scotia, Canada
Originally Posted by Garnet Canuck
That was a very objective review, I really enjoyed reading his comments on all of them.
Yea, it seemed pretty fair. Like some others have said I would be concerned with a vehicle this size that doesn't have adequate rear seat room.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 12:17 PM
  #10  
gcoupe's Avatar
gcoupe
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: NC
Certain forums on vwvortex are for mods only. You don’t have to register or log in to look at pictures or read most forums. It seems like the road test comparison thread was moved to the black hole forum after some of the members got carried away with their replies. Once a thread is moved to the “black hole” only mods have the right to view it.

According to the rules moderators can edit a post, delete a post, lock a thread (no more replies allowed), or "black hole" a post. The Black Hole is where threads go to die, so not only are no more replies allowed, but users cannot access the post at all. (Moderators can still access the post though).

Sometimes they clean the thread up and bring it back, let’s hope they will with this one. I thought it was a pretty good review and had some interesting pictures. Does anyone know any of the mods over there?

Not sure why the pictures are unavailable or were removed from flickr. Maybe Nissan had something to do with that.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 12:27 PM
  #11  
da mayor's Avatar
da mayor
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,651
Likes: 36
From: Long Island, NY
well preproduction models can still go back and update some changes.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 01:21 PM
  #12  
RBull's Avatar
RBull
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: Dartmouth,Nova Scotia, Canada
^ like increasing the wheelbase for more rear seat room?
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 02:52 PM
  #13  
bruddahmanmatt's Avatar
bruddahmanmatt
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Kaimuki, HI
Originally Posted by RBull
^ like increasing the wheelbase for more rear seat room?
HAHAHA. Exactly.

Things like shifter feel, pedal feel and various NVH issues are often addressed between the pre-pro and production phases, but to imply that the wheelbase might be lengthened or rear seat legroom somehow increased...riiiight. The basic specs for the dimensions of the vehicle are already locked in and those will not be changed.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 02:59 PM
  #14  
N50's Avatar
N50
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
From: 301, 269
Originally Posted by RBull
^ like increasing the wheelbase for more rear seat room?
So basically turning the new EX into a more refined, better interior having...FX? LOL
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 03:57 PM
  #15  
RBull's Avatar
RBull
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: Dartmouth,Nova Scotia, Canada
Originally Posted by bruddahmanmatt
HAHAHA. Exactly.

Things like shifter feel, pedal feel and various NVH issues are often addressed between the pre-pro and production phases, but to imply that the wheelbase might be lengthened or rear seat legroom somehow increased...riiiight. The basic specs for the dimensions of the vehicle are already locked in and those will not be changed.
My thoughts exactly, which is along the lines of my earlier post.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:30 PM.